LAC vs SGML vs ABAT Stock Comparison

Lithium Americas, Sigma Lithium and American Battery Technology Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LAC Lithium Americas Corp.
$2.16 -21.5% 1M -64.1% 1Y
Market cap
$781.58M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Lithium Basic Materials
1 win
SGML Sigma Lithium Corp
$8.45 -11.8% 1M +50.4% 1Y
Market cap
$941.36M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$142.49M
Div. yield
–
Lithium Basic Materials
5 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Sigma Lithium leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Sigma Lithium 5, American Battery Technology 2, Lithium Americas 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLACSGMLABATLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $781.58M $941.36M $210.90M SGML
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -26.9x -34.1x -2.6x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 27.3x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +7.3% +406.8% ABAT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -19.3% -337.5% SGML
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 0.0% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 7.6x 0.6x ABAT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -64.1% +50.4% -72.4% SGML
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -0.2%/yr -40.0%/yr SGML
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 66.6% 111.9% 94.7% LAC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 42/100 29/100 SGML

Percentile Scorecard

LACSGMLABAT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLACSGMLABAT
Valuation 93 #12 of 162 40 #98 of 162 12 #142 of 162
Growth – 77 #34 of 147 35 #96 of 147
Profitability – 46 #66 of 122 10 #110 of 122
Financial Health 45 #91 of 164 6 #154 of 164 78 #37 of 164
Shareholder Returns – – 9 #98 of 107
Overall – 42 29
  • LAC ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • SGML ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • ABAT ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLACSGMLABATSPY
1 month -21.5%-11.8%-34.1% -0.2%
3 months -22.3%-11.0%-31.7% +3.9%
6 months -56.1%-59.0%-55.0% +8.2%
Year to date -50.5%-35.9%-55.4% +12.9%
1 year -64.1%+50.4%-72.4% +12.3%
3 years -68.5%-69.5%-64.9% +87.4%
3 years, per year -32.0%-32.7%-29.4% +23.3%
5 years —-1.1%-92.2% +67.9%
5 years, per year —-0.2%-40.0% +10.9%
10 years ——-73.9% +261.1%
10 years, per year ——-12.6% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureLACSGMLABATSPY
Volatility, 1Y 66.6%111.9%94.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 64.5%98.8%91.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.572.173.56 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.960.45-0.76 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -82.8%-89.9%-97.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -66.5%-64.3%-72.4% -1.2%
52-week high $6.44$23.65$5.39 $779.14
52-week low $2.01$4.68$1.28 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLACSGMLABAT
P/E now vs peer median -26.9xmedian 13.3x -34.1xmedian 13.3x -2.6xmedian 13.3x
P/S now vs peer median —median 3.2x 6.6xmedian 3.2x 9.7xmedian 3.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 7.3x 41.4xmedian 7.3x -2.4xmedian 7.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 14.7x 38.7xmedian 14.7x -5.6xmedian 14.7x
P/B now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 2.2x 11.4xmedian 2.2x 1.7xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.31 -0.83median 0.31 0.60median 0.31

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLACSGMLABAT
Revenue – $142.49M $21.74M
Gross profit – $70.02M -$3.09M
Operating income – $10.66M -$74.71M
Net income -$73.07M -$27.56M -$73.38M
Free cash flow – $24.30M -$37.81M
R&D -$1.00K – $17.87M
EPS (diluted) $-0.07 $-0.25 $-0.58
Cash & equivalents $822.78M $16.66M $49.52M
Total debt $988.02M $226.73M $8.00M
Shares (diluted) 401.74M 111.31M 127.58M
Enterprise value -$971.15M $908.52M $43.28M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLACSGMLABAT
P/E -26.9x -34.1x -2.6x
P/FCF – 38.7x -5.6x
P/Operating cash flow – 24.9x -8.7x
P/S – 6.6x 9.7x
P/B 0.4x 11.4x 1.7x
P/Tangible book 0.4x 11.4x 1.7x
EV/EBITDA – 41.4x -2.4x
EV/EBIT – 108.0x -2.3x
EV/Revenue – 8.1x 7.8x
EV/FCF – 47.4x -4.5x
EV/Operating cash flow – 30.5x -7.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -0.83 0.60

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLACSGMLABAT
Revenue growth (1Y) – 7.3% 406.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 130.5% 70.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 40.5% -77.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – -49.3%
Net income growth (1Y) -33.9% 42.1% -56.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 39.5% -49.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 63.7% 42.6% 1.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 41.0% -4.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 148.2% 16.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 41.2% -21.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 14,876% -20.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 30.3% 8.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLACSGMLABAT
Gross margin – 49.1% -14.2%
EBITDA margin – 19.5% -320.6%
Operating margin – 7.5% -343.6%
Pretax margin – -6.9% -339.1%
Net margin – -19.3% -337.5%
FCF margin – 17.1% -173.9%
Operating cash flow margin – 26.5% -111.4%
Return on equity – -17.5% -61.7%
Return on assets – -3.4% -58.5%
Return on invested capital – 0.0% –
Return on capital employed – 7.9% -62.4%
Asset turnover – 0.4x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – -1.4x 0.3x
Stock comp / revenue – 7.8% 213.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLACSGMLABAT
Debt / assets 27.9% 47.4% 6.0%
Debt / equity 0.5x 2.8x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – 7.6x 0.6x
Debt / FCF – 9.3x -0.2x
Liabilities / assets 44.9% 82.8% 4.9%
Equity / assets 55.1% 17.2% 95.1%
Interest coverage – – -76.2x
Current ratio 5.5x 0.3x 9.5x
Quick ratio 3.5x 0.2x 8.9x
Cash ratio 3.5x 0.1x 7.7x
Altman Z-score – 0.57 14.89

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLACSGMLABAT
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – -36.3%
Shareholder yield – – -36.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLACSGMLABAT
Forward P/E – 27.3xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.08FY2026 $0.31FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +419.4% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $0.00FY2026 $174.11MFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY – +58.3%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after – +144.1% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLACSGMLABAT
Held by institutions 30.8% 33.1% 36.6%
Institutions holding 274 119 176
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.6% +9.7% +5.9%
Institutions buying 149 65 102
Institutions selling 57 40 33
Buyers to sellers 2.61 1.63 3.09

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LACSGMLABAT
LAC 1.00 0.52 0.68
SGML 0.52 1.00 0.35
ABAT 0.68 0.35 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LAC, SGML and ABAT?

Sigma Lithium (SGML) is the largest by market capitalisation: Lithium Americas (LAC) $781.58M, Sigma Lithium (SGML) $941.36M, American Battery Technology (ABAT) $210.90M.

Which company is growing faster?

American Battery Technology (ABAT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Sigma Lithium (SGML) +7.3%, American Battery Technology (ABAT) +406.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Sigma Lithium (SGML) has the highest net margin (Sigma Lithium (SGML) -19.3%, American Battery Technology (ABAT) -337.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Sigma Lithium (SGML) returned the most: Lithium Americas (LAC) -64.1%, Sigma Lithium (SGML) +50.4%, American Battery Technology (ABAT) -72.4%. Over five years, Sigma Lithium (SGML) compounded fastest (Sigma Lithium (SGML) -0.2%/yr, American Battery Technology (ABAT) -40.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Lithium Americas (LAC) has been the steadiest (Lithium Americas (LAC) 66.6%, Sigma Lithium (SGML) 111.9%, American Battery Technology (ABAT) 94.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LAC, SGML and ABAT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Sigma Lithium (SGML) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.