KYIV vs CHT vs TU Stock Comparison

Kyivstar, Chunghwa Telecom and Telus Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
KYIV Kyivstar Group Ltd.
$13.13 +0.6% 1M -1.5% 1Y
Market cap
$3.03B
P/E
17.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$662.00M
Div. yield
–
Wireless Carriers Communication Services
6 wins
CHT Chunghwa Telecom Co Ltd
$48.19 +4.5% 1M +11.2% 1Y
Market cap
$37.38B
P/E
27.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.90B
Div. yield
3.34%
Wireless Carriers Communication Services
5 wins
TU Telus Corp
$8.70 +2.6% 1M -42.2% 1Y
Market cap
$13.47B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$17.13B
Div. yield
16.67%
Wireless Carriers Communication Services
1 win

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Kyivstar leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Kyivstar 6, Chunghwa Telecom 5, Telus 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionKYIVCHTTULeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.03B $37.38B $13.47B CHT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 17.4x 27.9x -5.3x KYIV
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 9.6x 28.0x 17.1x KYIV
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -36.2% +8.3% +0.6% CHT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 24.6% 17.0% -14.8% KYIV
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 14.1% 10.7% 3.8% KYIV
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.5x — 4.3x KYIV
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 3.34% 16.67% TU
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -1.5% +11.2% -42.2% CHT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +4.0%/yr -17.5%/yr CHT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 49.5% 13.9% 26.3% CHT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 60/100 50/100 44/100 KYIV

Percentile Scorecard

KYIVCHTTU

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisKYIVCHTTU
Valuation 29 #18 of 25 25 #19 of 25 63 #10 of 25
Growth 19 #18 of 22 48 #12 of 22 14 #19 of 22
Profitability 100 #1 of 22 52 #11 of 22 29 #16 of 22
Financial Health 92 #3 of 26 96 #2 of 26 24 #20 of 26
Shareholder Returns – 30 #15 of 21 90 #3 of 21
Overall 60 50 44
  • KYIV ranked among 27 companies in Telecommunications
  • CHT ranked among 27 companies in Telecommunications
  • TU ranked among 27 companies in Telecommunications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodKYIVCHTTUSPY
1 month +0.6%+4.5%+2.6% -0.8%
3 months -3.8%+11.8%-16.3% +3.5%
6 months +13.9%+10.5%-28.3% +7.0%
Year to date +1.2%+15.5%-33.9% +12.2%
1 year -1.5%+11.2%-42.2% +13.0%
3 years —+35.7%-45.1% +86.3%
3 years, per year —+10.7%-18.2% +23.1%
5 years —+21.7%-61.8% +68.6%
5 years, per year —+4.0%-17.5% +11.0%
10 years —+38.1%-45.8% +258.0%
10 years, per year —+3.3%-5.9% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureKYIVCHTTUSPY
Volatility, 1Y 49.5%13.9%26.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 49.6%14.8%30.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.710.10-0.05 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.030.81-1.60 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -38.5%-26.5%-71.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -18.8%-1.1%-41.9% -1.8%
52-week high $16.17$48.73$14.98 $779.14
52-week low $9.33$40.74$7.72 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleKYIVCHTTU
P/E now vs peer median 17.4xmedian 12.3x 27.9xmedian 12.3x -5.3xmedian 12.3x
P/S now vs peer median 4.6xmedian 1.1x 4.7xmedian 1.1x 0.8xmedian 1.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 7.9xmedian 5.9x —median 5.9x 7.0xmedian 5.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 0.5xmedian 3.9x 59.8xmedian 3.9x 2.7xmedian 3.9x
P/B now vs peer median 2.2xmedian 1.1x 3.3xmedian 1.1x 1.4xmedian 1.1x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.25 2.08median 0.25 0.09median 0.25

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsKYIVCHTTU
Revenue $662.00M $7.90B $17.13B
Gross profit $7.07B $2.88B –
Operating income $238.00M $1.61B $833.56M
Net income $163.00M $1.34B -$2.52B
Free cash flow $6.23B $625.04M $4.97B
R&D – $144.76M –
EPS (diluted) $0.75 $1.72 $-1.65
Cash & equivalents $364.00M $1.32B $976.14M
Total debt $1.44B $620.49M $54.29B
Shares (diluted) 216.12M 777.60M 1.54B
Enterprise value $888.24M $29.88B $6.63B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricKYIVCHTTU
P/E 17.4x 27.9x -5.3x
P/FCF 0.5x 59.8x 2.7x
P/Operating cash flow 0.5x – 3.1x
P/S 4.6x 4.7x 0.8x
P/B 2.2x 3.3x 1.4x
P/Tangible book 3.2x 3.3x -3.3x
EV/EBITDA 7.9x – 7.0x
EV/EBIT 12.0x 21.8x 41.6x
EV/Revenue 4.3x 4.4x 2.0x
EV/FCF 0.5x 56.0x 7.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 0.5x – 8.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 2.08 0.09

Growth

14 metrics
MetricKYIVCHTTU
Revenue growth (1Y) -36.2% 8.3% 0.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 3.2% -2.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -33.0% 7.9% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 2.8% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -41.2% 6.9% -65.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 1.1% -30.6%
Net income growth (1Y) -45.8% 8.2% -4,024%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -0.8% -62.5%
EPS growth (1Y) -48.1% 52.6% -548.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 13.5% -61.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 12.7% – 4.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -1.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 20.5% -11.2% 15.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 2.4% 2.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricKYIVCHTTU
Gross margin 1,068% 36.5% –
EBITDA margin 55.0% – 28.7%
Operating margin 36.0% 20.3% 4.9%
Pretax margin 30.8% 21.0% 8.1%
Net margin 24.6% 17.0% -14.8%
FCF margin 941.5% 7.9% 29.0%
Operating cash flow margin 931.7% – 25.2%
Return on equity 12.0% 11.3% -10.0%
Return on assets 7.3% 1.9% -1.1%
Return on invested capital 14.1% 10.7% 3.8%
Return on capital employed 13.6% 2.4% 2.0%
Asset turnover 0.3x 0.1x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 37.8x – -1.7x
Stock comp / revenue – – 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricKYIVCHTTU
Debt / assets 15.7% 1.1% 55.4%
Debt / equity 0.3x 0.0x 2.2x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.5x – 4.3x
Debt / FCF 0.1x 0.3x 4.5x
Liabilities / assets 38.8% 34.0% 75.2%
Equity / assets 61.2% 66.0% 24.8%
Interest coverage 3.1x 144.6x 0.7x
Current ratio 1.3x 1.2x 0.7x
Quick ratio 1.2x 1.0x 0.5x
Cash ratio 1.1x 0.7x 0.1x
Altman Z-score – 6.02 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricKYIVCHTTU
Dividend yield – 3.3% 16.7%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – 3.3% 16.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – -46.0%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 23.3%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 8.0%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 11.2%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusKYIVCHTTU
Forward P/E 9.6xFY2026 28.0xFY2026 17.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.37FY2026 $1.72FY2026 $0.51FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +140.4%FY2026 +8.9%FY2026 -23.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +22.6% +3.5% +7.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.29BFY2026 $7.64BFY2026 $15.12BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +11.0%FY2026 +2.2%FY2026 +1.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +8.9% +12.1% -9.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersKYIVCHTTU
Held by institutions 12.7% 2.6% 44.5%
Institutions holding 74 218 291
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.3% +1.3% -4.8%
Institutions buying 46 136 154
Institutions selling 18 47 85
Buyers to sellers 2.56 2.89 1.81

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

KYIVCHTTU
KYIV 1.00 -0.05 -0.11
CHT -0.05 1.00 0.21
TU -0.11 0.21 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, KYIV, CHT and TU?

Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Kyivstar (KYIV) $3.03B, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) $37.38B, Telus (TU) $13.47B.

Which stock is cheaper, KYIV, CHT and TU?

Kyivstar (KYIV) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Kyivstar (KYIV) 17.4x, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 27.9x, Telus (TU) -5.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Kyivstar (KYIV) is cheapest (Kyivstar (KYIV) 9.6x, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 28.0x, Telus (TU) 17.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Kyivstar (KYIV) -36.2%, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) +8.3%, Telus (TU) +0.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Kyivstar (KYIV) has the highest net margin (Kyivstar (KYIV) 24.6%, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 17.0%, Telus (TU) -14.8%). On return on invested capital, Kyivstar (KYIV) leads (Kyivstar (KYIV) 14.1%, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 10.7%, Telus (TU) 3.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) returned the most: Kyivstar (KYIV) -1.5%, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) +11.2%, Telus (TU) -42.2%. Over five years, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) compounded fastest (Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) +4.0%/yr, Telus (TU) -17.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Telus (TU) has the highest dividend yield: Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 3.34%, Telus (TU) 16.67%. Kyivstar (KYIV) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) has been the steadiest (Kyivstar (KYIV) 49.5%, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 13.9%, Telus (TU) 26.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, KYIV, CHT and TU?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Kyivstar (KYIV) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.