KVYO vs RAMP vs ZETA Stock Comparison

Klaviyo, LiveRamp Holdings and Zeta Global Holdings Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
KVYO Klaviyo, Inc.
$20.82 +25.4% 1M -22.5% 1Y
Market cap
$5.94B
P/E
750.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.47B
Div. yield
–
Marketing Software Technology
RAMP LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.
$38.50 +2.6% 1M +40.9% 1Y
Market cap
$2.34B
P/E
15.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$832.10M
Div. yield
–
Marketing Software Technology
5 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

LiveRamp Holdings leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (LiveRamp Holdings 5, Zeta Global Holdings 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionKVYORAMPZETALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.94B $2.34B $6.68B ZETA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 750.0x 15.0x -3,333x RAMP
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 26.0x 12.5x 28.9x RAMP
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +27.0% +8.9% +35.9% ZETA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.5% 18.7% -0.1% RAMP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 0.5% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — -1.0x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -22.5% +40.9% +47.8% ZETA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -6.4%/yr +26.2%/yr ZETA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 78.4% 37.0% 62.6% RAMP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 74/100 83/100 61/100 RAMP

Percentile Scorecard

KVYORAMPZETA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisKVYORAMPZETA
Valuation 40 #60 of 100 88 #13 of 100 38 #62 of 100
Growth 94 #7 of 99 86 #15 of 99 99 #2 of 99
Profitability 60 #39 of 96 74 #26 of 96 51 #48 of 96
Financial Health 93 #9 of 112 92 #10 of 112 85 #18 of 112
Shareholder Returns 82 #13 of 67 77 #16 of 67 32 #46 of 67
Overall 74 83 61
  • KVYO ranked among 113 companies in Business Applications
  • RAMP ranked among 113 companies in Business Applications
  • ZETA ranked among 113 companies in Business Applications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodKVYORAMPZETASPY
1 month +25.4%+2.6%-10.6% -5.9%
3 months +24.4%+1.6%+15.3% -4.6%
6 months +32.0%+27.4%+70.5% +0.2%
Year to date -35.9%+31.1%+44.8% +7.5%
1 year -22.5%+40.9%+47.8% +8.2%
3 years -33.7%+39.2%+262.5% +68.3%
3 years, per year -12.8%+11.7%+53.7% +19.0%
5 years —-28.1%+220.3% +56.5%
5 years, per year —-6.4%+26.2% +9.4%
10 years —+62.0%— +251.5%
10 years, per year —+4.9%— +13.4%

Risk

MeasureKVYORAMPZETASPY
Volatility, 1Y 78.4%37.0%62.6% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 90.2%29.8%60.2% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.440.352.13 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.291.100.76 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -73.9%-72.7%-70.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -37.4%0.0%-13.6% -5.9%
52-week high $33.26$38.50$34.12 $779.14
52-week low $12.86$22.42$14.55 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleKVYORAMPZETA
P/E now vs peer median 750.0xmedian 24.7x 15.0xmedian 24.7x -3,333xmedian 24.7x
P/S now vs peer median 4.1xmedian 2.8x 2.8xmedian 2.8x 4.3xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 99.4xmedian 16.5x 17.9xmedian 16.5x 60.9xmedian 16.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 24.2xmedian 15.3x 11.8xmedian 15.3x 29.8xmedian 15.3x
P/B now vs peer median 6.9xmedian 2.7x 2.4xmedian 2.7x 7.2xmedian 2.7x
PEG now vs peer median 28.32median 0.77 0.27median 0.77 -40.57median 0.77

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsKVYORAMPZETA
Revenue $1.47B $832.10M $1.57B
Gross profit $1.08B $589.26M $934.32M
Operating income -$19.55M $96.41M $24.68M
Net income $7.92M $155.72M -$2.17M
Free cash flow $245.30M $198.85M $224.41M
R&D $346.22M $145.67M $146.97M
EPS (diluted) $0.03 $2.52 $-0.01
Cash & equivalents $705.44M $363.52M $309.95M
Total debt – – $197.48M
Shares (diluted) 286.47M 61.85M 256.58M
Enterprise value $2.35B $802.20M $5.38B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricKVYORAMPZETA
P/E 750.0x 15.0x -3,333x
P/FCF 24.2x 11.8x 29.8x
P/Operating cash flow 21.7x 11.7x 27.7x
P/S 4.1x 2.8x 4.3x
P/B 6.9x 2.4x 7.2x
P/Tangible book 6.9x 2.4x 9.0x
EV/EBITDA 99.4x 17.9x 60.9x
EV/EBIT -267.7x 20.4x 266.2x
EV/Revenue 3.6x 2.4x 4.2x
EV/FCF 21.3x 9.9x 29.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 19.1x 9.8x 27.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 28.32 0.27 -40.57

Growth

14 metrics
MetricKVYORAMPZETA
Revenue growth (1Y) 27.0% 8.9% 35.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 31.7% 11.0% 33.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 24.3% 8.7% 32.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 31.7% 10.8% 30.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) 80.6% 439.4% 192.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 59.7% 44.0% 28.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 112.0% 979.7% 94.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 26.6% 54.3% 78.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 112.6% 1,065% 95.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 26.5% 56.0% 82.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 48.1% 36.0% 55.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 39.2% 29.0% 42.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 39.7% 35.9% 64.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 35.1% 30.0% 52.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricKVYORAMPZETA
Gross margin 73.5% 70.8% 59.5%
EBITDA margin 3.6% 13.2% 6.9%
Operating margin -1.3% 11.6% 1.6%
Pretax margin 0.9% 13.3% -0.6%
Net margin 0.5% 18.7% -0.1%
FCF margin 16.7% 23.9% 14.3%
Operating cash flow margin 18.7% 24.1% 15.3%
Return on equity 0.9% 16.0% -0.2%
Return on assets 0.6% 12.1% -0.1%
Return on invested capital – – 0.5%
Return on capital employed -1.9% 9.2% 2.1%
Asset turnover 1.1x 0.6x 1.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 34.6x 1.3x -111.1x
Stock comp / revenue 11.8% 9.4% 12.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricKVYORAMPZETA
Debt / assets – – 13.5%
Debt / equity – – 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – – -1.0x
Debt / FCF – – 0.9x
Liabilities / assets 33.1% 23.6% 36.9%
Equity / assets 66.9% 76.4% 63.1%
Interest coverage – – 16.1x
Current ratio 2.8x 2.7x 2.4x
Quick ratio 2.5x 2.5x 2.3x
Cash ratio 2.2x 1.6x 1.1x
Altman Z-score 8.98 7.55 7.84

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricKVYORAMPZETA
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 8.0% 7.6% 1.6%
Shareholder yield 8.0% 7.6% 1.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusKVYORAMPZETA
Forward P/E 26.0xFY2026 12.5xFY2026 28.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.80FY2026 $3.07FY2026 $1.02FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +19.4%FY2026 +35.2%FY2026 +39.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +36.3% +11.1% +23.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.58BFY2026 $843.08MFY2026 $1.93BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +28.3%FY2026 +3.7%FY2026 +48.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +11.0% +8.2% +3.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersKVYORAMPZETA
Held by institutions 100.0% 100.0% 82.6%
Institutions holding 276 309 414
Change in shares held, QoQ -7.7% +0.5% +3.9%
Institutions buying 168 166 245
Institutions selling 75 106 117
Buyers to sellers 2.24 1.57 2.09

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

KVYORAMPZETA
KVYO 1.00 0.34 0.52
RAMP 0.34 1.00 0.46
ZETA 0.52 0.46 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, KVYO, RAMP and ZETA?

Zeta Global Holdings (ZETA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Klaviyo (KVYO) $5.94B, LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) $2.34B, Zeta Global Holdings (ZETA) $6.68B.

Which stock is cheaper, KVYO, RAMP and ZETA?

LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Klaviyo (KVYO) 750.0x, LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) 15.0x, Zeta Global Holdings (ZETA) -3,333x). On next year's consensus earnings, LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) is cheapest (Klaviyo (KVYO) 26.0x, LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) 12.5x, Zeta Global Holdings (ZETA) 28.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Zeta Global Holdings (ZETA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Klaviyo (KVYO) +27.0%, LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) +8.9%, Zeta Global Holdings (ZETA) +35.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) has the highest net margin (Klaviyo (KVYO) 0.5%, LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) 18.7%, Zeta Global Holdings (ZETA) -0.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Zeta Global Holdings (ZETA) returned the most: Klaviyo (KVYO) -22.5%, LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) +40.9%, Zeta Global Holdings (ZETA) +47.8%. Over five years, Zeta Global Holdings (ZETA) compounded fastest (LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) -6.4%/yr, Zeta Global Holdings (ZETA) +26.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) has been the steadiest (Klaviyo (KVYO) 78.4%, LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) 37.0%, Zeta Global Holdings (ZETA) 62.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, KVYO, RAMP and ZETA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.