KTCC vs TTMI vs JBL Stock Comparison

Key Tronic, Ttm Technologies and Jabil Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
KTCC Key Tronic Corp
$2.12 -2.3% 1M -34.8% 1Y
Market cap
$23.35M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$386.67M
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
1 win
TTMI Ttm Technologies Inc
$85.50 -33.8% 1M +45.5% 1Y
Market cap
$9.06B
P/E
38.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.38B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
5 wins
JBL Jabil Inc
$275.90 -12.9% 1M +29.9% 1Y
Market cap
$30.03B
P/E
28.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$35.95B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Jabil leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Jabil 5, Ttm Technologies 5, Key Tronic 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionKTCCTTMIJBLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $23.35M $9.06B $30.03B JBL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -0.5x 38.3x 28.8x JBL
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 16.2x 16.0x JBL
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -17.4% +27.6% +20.6% TTMI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -12.4% 7.0% 2.9% TTMI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -6.5% 10.6% 25.9% JBL
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -46.7x 1.0x 0.7x KTCC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -34.8% +45.5% +29.9% TTMI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -20.0%/yr +44.5%/yr +35.5%/yr TTMI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 60.5% 90.5% 47.7% JBL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 26/100 59/100 57/100 TTMI

Percentile Scorecard

KTCCTTMIJBL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisKTCCTTMIJBL
Valuation 61 #44 of 111 51 #55 of 111 71 #33 of 111
Growth 2 #106 of 108 88 #14 of 108 64 #40 of 108
Profitability 25 #78 of 104 62 #40 of 104 68 #34 of 104
Financial Health 16 #97 of 115 37 #73 of 115 18 #94 of 115
Shareholder Returns – – 66 #28 of 81
Overall 26 59 57
  • KTCC ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • TTMI ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • JBL ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodKTCCTTMIJBLSPY
1 month -2.3%-33.8%-12.9% -0.8%
3 months -47.4%-30.9%-11.4% +3.5%
6 months -28.1%-40.7%-19.0% +7.0%
Year to date -24.0%+23.9%+21.0% +12.2%
1 year -34.8%+45.5%+29.9% +13.0%
3 years -45.5%+642.2%+125.1% +86.3%
3 years, per year -18.3%+95.2%+31.1% +23.1%
5 years -67.2%+528.7%+356.0% +68.6%
5 years, per year -20.0%+44.5%+35.5% +11.0%
10 years -73.6%+652.6%+1,172.6% +258.0%
10 years, per year -12.5%+22.4%+29.0% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureKTCCTTMIJBLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 60.5%90.5%47.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 70.9%97.7%52.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.823.812.19 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.570.500.63 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -71.8%-66.6%-36.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -50.2%-61.4%-28.5% -1.8%
52-week high $4.26$221.47$385.63 $779.14
52-week low $2.06$58.45$192.49 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleKTCCTTMIJBL
P/E now vs peer median -0.5xmedian 32.0x 37.7xmedian 32.0x 28.0xmedian 32.0x
P/S now vs peer median 0.1xmedian 2.8x 2.7xmedian 2.8x 0.8xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -52.6xmedian 19.4x 19.4xmedian 19.4x 12.8xmedian 19.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median -11.9xmedian 29.0x -594.9xmedian 29.0x 21.0xmedian 29.0x
P/B now vs peer median 0.3xmedian 2.9x 4.7xmedian 2.9x 17.8xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median 0.00median 1.13 0.80median 1.13 1.61median 1.13

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsKTCCTTMIJBL
Revenue $386.67M $3.38B $35.95B
Gross profit $23.94M $715.64M $3.32B
Operating income -$14.72M $334.16M $1.70B
Net income -$47.80M $236.78M $1.04B
Free cash flow -$1.93M -$15.14M $1.37B
R&D $8.01M $29.71M $30.00M
EPS (diluted) $-4.41 $2.20 $9.75
Cash & equivalents $584.00K $507.91M $1.74B
Total debt $182.02M $3.72B $3.38B
Shares (diluted) 10.84M 107.58M 106.90M
Enterprise value $20.42M $7.15B $23.53B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricKTCCTTMIJBL
P/E -0.5x 37.7x 28.0x
P/FCF -11.9x -594.9x 21.0x
P/Operating cash flow 5.2x 27.9x 14.4x
P/S 0.1x 2.7x 0.8x
P/B 0.3x 4.7x 17.8x
P/Tangible book 0.3x 5.0x 28.4x
EV/EBITDA -52.6x 19.4x 12.8x
EV/EBIT -13.9x 28.3x 17.9x
EV/Revenue 0.5x 2.8x 0.8x
EV/FCF -106.1x -625.7x 22.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 46.2x 29.3x 15.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.00 0.80 1.61

Growth

14 metrics
MetricKTCCTTMIJBL
Revenue growth (1Y) -17.4% 27.6% 20.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -13.9% 12.3% 1.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -34.3% 33.6% 25.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -20.4% 18.5% 5.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) -2,719% 94.3% 44.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -42.6% 47.1% 3.5%
Net income growth (1Y) -474.7% 154.1% 58.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -124.2% 48.5% 8.4%
EPS growth (1Y) -470.7% 147.7% 64.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -124.8% 47.2% 17.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -76.6% 35.5% 22.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 33.7% – 4.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -113.0% -185.8% 17.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 55.0% – 25.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricKTCCTTMIJBL
Gross margin 6.2% 21.2% 9.2%
EBITDA margin -1.0% 14.5% 6.6%
Operating margin -3.8% 9.9% 4.7%
Pretax margin -6.4% 7.8% 3.9%
Net margin -12.4% 7.0% 2.9%
FCF margin -0.5% -0.4% 3.8%
Operating cash flow margin 1.1% 9.6% 5.6%
Return on equity -55.5% 12.6% 70.7%
Return on assets -15.4% 5.6% 4.1%
Return on invested capital -6.5% 10.6% 25.9%
Return on capital employed -7.2% 11.4% 43.1%
Asset turnover 1.2x 0.8x 1.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.1x 1.4x 1.9x
Stock comp / revenue 0.2% 1.8% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricKTCCTTMIJBL
Debt / assets 60.7% 22.0% 12.3%
Debt / equity 2.6x 0.5x 2.1x
Net debt / EBITDA -46.7x 1.0x 0.7x
Debt / FCF -94.5x -64.3x 2.5x
Liabilities / assets 76.9% 56.2% 94.1%
Equity / assets 23.1% 43.8% 5.9%
Interest coverage -1.5x 7.6x –
Current ratio 2.1x 1.8x 1.0x
Quick ratio 1.0x 1.4x 0.4x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.4x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 1.75 3.82 2.56

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricKTCCTTMIJBL
Dividend yield – – 0.1%
Net buyback yield – – 3.6%
Shareholder yield – – 3.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusKTCCTTMIJBL
Forward P/E – 16.2xFY2026 16.0xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year – $5.29FY2026 $17.25FY2027
EPS growth, next FY – +115.0%FY2026 +31.8%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after – +53.3% +36.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $4.26BFY2026 $46.50BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY – +46.4%FY2026 +29.3%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after – +60.2% +17.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersKTCCTTMIJBL
Held by institutions 41.0% 92.4% 96.9%
Institutions holding 26 638 1,120
Change in shares held, QoQ -4.2% +0.6% +3.2%
Institutions buying 10 396 618
Institutions selling 8 202 373
Buyers to sellers 1.25 1.96 1.66

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

KTCCTTMIJBL
KTCC 1.00 0.08 0.10
TTMI 0.08 1.00 0.68
JBL 0.10 0.68 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, KTCC, TTMI and JBL?

Jabil (JBL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Key Tronic (KTCC) $23.35M, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) $9.06B, Jabil (JBL) $30.03B.

Which stock is cheaper, KTCC, TTMI and JBL?

Jabil (JBL) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Key Tronic (KTCC) -0.5x, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 38.3x, Jabil (JBL) 28.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Jabil (JBL) is cheapest (Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 16.2x, Jabil (JBL) 16.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Ttm Technologies (TTMI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Key Tronic (KTCC) -17.4%, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) +27.6%, Jabil (JBL) +20.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ttm Technologies (TTMI) has the highest net margin (Key Tronic (KTCC) -12.4%, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 7.0%, Jabil (JBL) 2.9%). On return on invested capital, Jabil (JBL) leads (Key Tronic (KTCC) -6.5%, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 10.6%, Jabil (JBL) 25.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ttm Technologies (TTMI) returned the most: Key Tronic (KTCC) -34.8%, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) +45.5%, Jabil (JBL) +29.9%. Over five years, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) compounded fastest (Key Tronic (KTCC) -20.0%/yr, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) +44.5%/yr, Jabil (JBL) +35.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Jabil (JBL) has been the steadiest (Key Tronic (KTCC) 60.5%, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 90.5%, Jabil (JBL) 47.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, KTCC, TTMI and JBL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Jabil (JBL) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.