KTB vs FIGS vs WRBY Stock Comparison

Kontoor Brands, Figs and Warby Parker Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
KTB Kontoor Brands, Inc.
$75.69 +15.8% 1M -10.9% 1Y
Market cap
$4.16B
P/E
16.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.95B
Div. yield
–
Apparel Consumer Discretionary
5 wins
FIGS FIGS, Inc.
$20.83 +55.1% 1M +153.1% 1Y
Market cap
$3.39B
P/E
54.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$710.08M
Div. yield
–
Apparel Consumer Discretionary
4 wins
WRBY Warby Parker Inc.
$25.28 -5.4% 1M +18.9% 1Y
Market cap
$3.13B
P/E
403.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$911.61M
Div. yield
–
Apparel Consumer Discretionary

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Kontoor Brands leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Kontoor Brands 5, Figs 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionKTBFIGSWRBYLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.16B $3.39B $3.13B KTB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 16.7x 54.8x 403.9x KTB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 13.9x 57.9x 57.5x KTB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +18.6% +24.7% +11.0% FIGS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 8.5% 8.7% 0.8% FIGS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 14.5% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -10.9% +153.1% +18.9% FIGS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +7.5%/yr -8.7%/yr -14.5%/yr KTB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 47.9% 70.4% 75.8% KTB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 52/100 67/100 46/100 FIGS

Percentile Scorecard

KTBFIGSWRBY

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisKTBFIGSWRBY
Valuation 22 #36 of 46 13 #40 of 46 7 #43 of 46
Growth 57 #19 of 43 100 #1 of 43 83 #8 of 43
Profitability 88 #6 of 42 81 #9 of 42 34 #28 of 42
Financial Health 31 #37 of 53 96 #3 of 53 83 #10 of 53
Shareholder Returns 61 #14 of 34 46 #19 of 34 21 #27 of 34
Overall 52 67 46
  • KTB ranked among 53 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • FIGS ranked among 53 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • WRBY ranked among 53 companies in Apparel and Luxury

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodKTBFIGSWRBYSPY
1 month +15.8%+55.1%-5.4% -0.8%
3 months -11.8%+109.8%+1.7% +3.5%
6 months +8.9%+33.4%+8.7% +7.0%
Year to date +23.9%+83.4%+16.0% +12.2%
1 year -10.9%+153.1%+18.9% +13.0%
3 years +62.2%+265.4%+96.3% +86.3%
3 years, per year +17.5%+54.1%+25.2% +23.1%
5 years +43.5%-36.4%-54.3% +68.6%
5 years, per year +7.5%-8.7%-14.5% +11.0%

Risk

MeasureKTBFIGSWRBYSPY
Volatility, 1Y 47.9%70.4%75.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 46.0%65.9%67.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.790.752.14 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.232.170.25 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -48.3%-91.5%-83.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -14.2%0.0%-16.7% -1.8%
52-week high $88.17$20.83$30.34 $779.14
52-week low $57.48$7.38$16.49 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleKTBFIGSWRBY
P/E now vs peer median 16.7xmedian 16.6x 56.0xmedian 16.6x 404.7xmedian 16.6x
P/S now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 0.7x 4.6xmedian 0.7x 3.4xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 9.7x 37.8xmedian 9.7x 47.9xmedian 9.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 12.2x 33.7xmedian 12.2x 143.3xmedian 12.2x
P/B now vs peer median 6.7xmedian 2.2x 7.4xmedian 2.2x 8.0xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 2.22median 0.64 0.92median 0.64 14.41median 0.64

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsKTBFIGSWRBY
Revenue $2.95B $710.08M $911.61M
Gross profit $1.38B $489.29M $498.49M
Operating income $332.45M $68.19M $1.55M
Net income $249.37M $61.92M $7.74M
Free cash flow – $97.22M $21.75M
EPS (diluted) $4.49 $0.32 $0.06
Cash & equivalents $58.46M $108.54M $292.67M
Total debt $1.14B – –
Shares (diluted) 55.50M 195.14M 125.75M
Enterprise value $3.85B $2.28B $1.98B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricKTBFIGSWRBY
P/E 16.7x 56.0x 404.7x
P/FCF – 33.7x 143.3x
P/Operating cash flow – 30.4x 32.7x
P/S 1.4x 4.6x 3.4x
P/B 6.7x 7.4x 8.0x
P/Tangible book 24.2x 7.4x 8.0x
EV/EBITDA – 37.8x 47.9x
EV/EBIT 15.7x 43.8x 1,820x
EV/Revenue 1.8x 4.2x 3.1x
EV/FCF – 30.7x 129.9x
EV/Operating cash flow – 27.6x 29.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.22 0.92 14.41

Growth

14 metrics
MetricKTBFIGSWRBY
Revenue growth (1Y) 18.6% 24.7% 11.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 4.0% 10.1% 12.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 22.2% 27.8% 11.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 7.9% 9.6% 12.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) 6.3% 583.6% 108.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 1.5% 41.0% 26.4%
Net income growth (1Y) -0.8% 762.2% 183.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 6.7% 64.4% 28.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 0.1% 664.0% 181.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 7.5% 61.1% 28.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 116.9% -18.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 82.7% 22.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 143.8% -58.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 98.2% 249.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricKTBFIGSWRBY
Gross margin 46.8% 68.9% 54.7%
EBITDA margin – 11.1% 6.5%
Operating margin 11.3% 9.6% 0.2%
Pretax margin 9.8% 10.8% 1.1%
Net margin 8.5% 8.7% 0.8%
FCF margin – 13.7% 2.4%
Operating cash flow margin – 15.2% 10.5%
Return on equity 41.3% 14.2% 2.0%
Return on assets 9.3% 10.8% 1.0%
Return on invested capital 14.5% – –
Return on capital employed 16.6% 14.2% 0.3%
Asset turnover 1.1x 1.2x 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.7x 12.3x
Stock comp / revenue – 3.4% 3.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricKTBFIGSWRBY
Debt / assets 42.9% – –
Debt / equity 1.8x – –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 76.8% 24.1% 49.2%
Equity / assets 23.2% 75.9% 50.8%
Interest coverage 4.9x – –
Current ratio 1.8x 5.0x 2.3x
Quick ratio 0.5x 3.7x 1.8x
Cash ratio 0.1x 3.2x 1.8x
Altman Z-score 3.11 16.70 5.20

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricKTBFIGSWRBY
Dividend yield 2.8% – –
Net buyback yield – 0.9% -0.1%
Shareholder yield 2.8% 0.9% -0.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusKTBFIGSWRBY
Forward P/E 13.9xFY2026 57.9xFY2026 57.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $5.45FY2026 $0.36FY2026 $0.44FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -2.5%FY2026 +89.5%FY2026 +22.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +12.1% 0.0% +36.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.85BFY2026 $728.69MFY2026 $920.99MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -9.5%FY2026 +15.5%FY2026 +5.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -5.1% +18.3% +30.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersKTBFIGSWRBY
Held by institutions 100.0% 99.1% 100.0%
Institutions holding 429 242 301
Change in shares held, QoQ +6.9% +3.1% +15.2%
Institutions buying 214 139 195
Institutions selling 137 69 77
Buyers to sellers 1.56 2.01 2.53

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

KTBFIGSWRBY
KTB 1.00 0.16 0.23
FIGS 0.16 1.00 0.14
WRBY 0.23 0.14 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, KTB, FIGS and WRBY?

Kontoor Brands (KTB) is the largest by market capitalisation: Kontoor Brands (KTB) $4.16B, Figs (FIGS) $3.39B, Warby Parker (WRBY) $3.13B.

Which stock is cheaper, KTB, FIGS and WRBY?

Kontoor Brands (KTB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Kontoor Brands (KTB) 16.7x, Figs (FIGS) 54.8x, Warby Parker (WRBY) 403.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Kontoor Brands (KTB) is cheapest (Kontoor Brands (KTB) 13.9x, Figs (FIGS) 57.9x, Warby Parker (WRBY) 57.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Figs (FIGS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Kontoor Brands (KTB) +18.6%, Figs (FIGS) +24.7%, Warby Parker (WRBY) +11.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Figs (FIGS) has the highest net margin (Kontoor Brands (KTB) 8.5%, Figs (FIGS) 8.7%, Warby Parker (WRBY) 0.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Figs (FIGS) returned the most: Kontoor Brands (KTB) -10.9%, Figs (FIGS) +153.1%, Warby Parker (WRBY) +18.9%. Over five years, Kontoor Brands (KTB) compounded fastest (Kontoor Brands (KTB) +7.5%/yr, Figs (FIGS) -8.7%/yr, Warby Parker (WRBY) -14.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Kontoor Brands (KTB) has been the steadiest (Kontoor Brands (KTB) 47.9%, Figs (FIGS) 70.4%, Warby Parker (WRBY) 75.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, KTB, FIGS and WRBY?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Kontoor Brands (KTB) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.