KRNT vs SVMB vs TRI Stock Comparison

Kornit Digital, Jingbo Technology and Thomson Reuters Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
KRNT Kornit Digital Ltd.
$17.87 +14.8% 1M +25.8% 1Y
Market cap
$823.00M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$215.85M
Div. yield
–
Industrial Machinery Industrials
1 win
SVMB Jingbo Technology, Inc.
$2.66 +166.0% 1M +26.7% 1Y
Market cap
$1.48B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.24M
Div. yield
–
Business Process Automation Technology
2 wins
TRI Thomson Reuters Corp /Can/
$122.08 +23.3% 1M -24.9% 1Y
Market cap
$52.26B
P/E
32.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.83B
Div. yield
-0.01%
Compliance Software Technology
6 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Thomson Reuters leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Thomson Reuters 6, Jingbo Technology 2, Kornit Digital 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionKRNTSVMBTRILeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $823.00M $1.48B $52.26B TRI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -40.5x -245.4x 32.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 89.4x — 27.3x TRI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +4.0% -45.7% +7.0% TRI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -9.4% -486.2% 20.7% TRI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -4.6x 1.2x SVMB
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — -0.01% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +25.8% +26.7% -24.9% SVMB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -35.5%/yr — -0.1%/yr TRI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 43.8% 129.0% 51.7% KRNT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 44/100 10/100 56/100 TRI

Percentile Scorecard

KRNTSVMBTRI

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisKRNTSVMBTRI
Valuation 48 #107 of 203 17 #85 of 102 49 #53 of 102
Growth 41 #111 of 187 5 #93 of 98 28 #71 of 98
Profitability 23 #143 of 185 2 #93 of 95 99 #2 of 95
Financial Health 99 #3 of 219 16 #92 of 109 66 #38 of 109
Shareholder Returns 11 #137 of 153 – 38 #40 of 64
Overall 44 10 56
  • KRNT ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • SVMB ranked among 115 companies in Business Applications
  • TRI ranked among 115 companies in Business Applications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodKRNTSVMBTRISPY
1 month +14.8%+166.0%+23.3% -0.8%
3 months +16.1%+166.0%+24.9% +3.5%
6 months +13.8%+56.5%+37.1% +7.0%
Year to date +24.3%+23.7%-7.4% +12.2%
1 year +25.8%+26.7%-24.9% +13.0%
3 years +30.4%-99.1%+3.6% +86.3%
3 years, per year +9.3%-79.3%+1.2% +23.1%
5 years -88.8%—-0.5% +68.6%
5 years, per year -35.5%—-0.1% +11.0%
10 years +72.7%—+196.4% +258.0%
10 years, per year +5.6%—+11.5% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureKRNTSVMBTRISPY
Volatility, 1Y 43.8%129.0%51.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 40.5%380.7%52.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.520.500.18 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.590.21-0.48 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -93.0%-99.9%-64.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -2.4%0.0%-24.8% -1.8%
52-week high $18.31$2.66$162.38 $779.14
52-week low $12.31$0.66$76.55 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleKRNTSVMBTRI
P/E now vs peer median -39.8xmedian 26.0x -245.4xmedian 28.8x 33.8xmedian 28.8x
P/S now vs peer median 3.8xmedian 1.9x 1,193xmedian 2.8x 6.9xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -16.6xmedian 14.0x -250.2xmedian 17.7x 27.0xmedian 17.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 31.0xmedian 21.4x -511.1xmedian 15.8x 17.0xmedian 15.8x
P/B now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 2.2x -44.7xmedian 3.2x 4.9xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median -1.09median 1.26 5.79median 0.85 3.26median 0.85

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsKRNTSVMBTRI
Revenue $215.85M $1.24M $7.83B
Gross profit $97.83M -$132.45K –
Operating income -$40.02M -$6.50M $2.33B
Net income -$20.32M -$6.64M $1.68B
Free cash flow $26.70M -$2.89M $3.19B
R&D $20.41M $245.84K –
EPS (diluted) $-0.45 $-0.01 $3.61
Cash & equivalents $33.81M $47.85K $577.00M
Total debt – $27.85M $3.26B
Shares (diluted) 45.24M 555.32M 449.53M
Enterprise value -$719.84M $1.48B $49.05B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricKRNTSVMBTRI
P/E -39.8x -245.4x 33.8x
P/FCF 31.0x -511.1x 17.0x
P/Operating cash flow 27.8x -551.0x 18.8x
P/S 3.8x 1,193x 6.9x
P/B 1.2x -44.7x 4.9x
P/Tangible book 1.3x -44.7x 6.7x
EV/EBITDA -16.6x -250.2x 27.0x
EV/EBIT -11.3x -231.6x 24.4x
EV/Revenue 2.1x 1,216x 7.3x
EV/FCF 17.0x -520.7x 17.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 15.2x -561.4x 19.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.09 5.79 3.26

Growth

14 metrics
MetricKRNTSVMBTRI
Revenue growth (1Y) 4.0% -45.7% 7.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -2.7% -21.4% 5.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -1.6% -143.9% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 9.5% 42.3% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -28.0% -71.1% 9.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 21.6% -11.3% -0.5%
Net income growth (1Y) -80.4% -283.0% 4.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 38.6% -9.7% -6.8%
EPS growth (1Y) -89.3% -431.3% 8.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 36.6% -42.4% 10.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -40.1% -32.4% 14.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 33.9% -178.1% 10.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -41.6% -60.8% 13.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 34.6% -29.6% 9.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricKRNTSVMBTRI
Gross margin 45.3% -10.7% –
EBITDA margin -12.7% -486.0% 26.9%
Operating margin -18.5% -525.0% 29.7%
Pretax margin -9.0% -535.8% 46.5%
Net margin -9.4% -486.2% 20.7%
FCF margin 12.4% -233.5% 40.7%
Operating cash flow margin 13.8% -216.6% 36.9%
Return on equity -3.0% – –
Return on assets -2.7% -87.5% –
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed -5.9% – –
Asset turnover 0.3x 0.2x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -1.5x 0.4x 1.7x
Stock comp / revenue 9.6% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricKRNTSVMBTRI
Debt / assets – 373.6% 18.0%
Debt / equity – -0.8x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA – -4.6x 1.2x
Debt / FCF – -9.6x 1.0x
Liabilities / assets 11.4% 543.0% 38.5%
Equity / assets 88.6% -443.0% 61.5%
Interest coverage – -98.6x 116.5x
Current ratio 8.8x 0.2x 0.5x
Quick ratio 6.6x 1.9x -2.5x
Cash ratio 5.7x 0.0x 0.2x
Altman Z-score – 9.42 6.10

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricKRNTSVMBTRI
Dividend yield – – 3.3%
Net buyback yield -4.7% – -2.1%
Shareholder yield -4.7% – 1.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 30.9%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 16.3%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – -10.6%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – -8.5%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusKRNTSVMBTRI
Forward P/E 89.4xFY2026 – 27.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.20FY2026 – $4.47FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -35.5%FY2026 – +12.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +50.0% – +8.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $229.31MFY2026 – $7.73BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +10.1%FY2026 – +3.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +0.8% – +15.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersKRNTSVMBTRI
Held by institutions 90.9% – 90.1%
Institutions holding 118 – 421
Change in shares held, QoQ -3.9% – +0.6%
Institutions buying 65 – 408
Institutions selling 35 – 9
Buyers to sellers 1.86 – 45.33

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

KRNTSVMBTRI
KRNT 1.00 0.09 -0.03
SVMB 0.09 1.00 0.12
TRI -0.03 0.12 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, KRNT, SVMB and TRI?

Thomson Reuters (TRI) is the largest by market capitalisation: Kornit Digital (KRNT) $823.00M, Jingbo Technology (SVMB) $1.48B, Thomson Reuters (TRI) $52.26B.

Which company is growing faster?

Thomson Reuters (TRI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Kornit Digital (KRNT) +4.0%, Jingbo Technology (SVMB) -45.7%, Thomson Reuters (TRI) +7.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Thomson Reuters (TRI) has the highest net margin (Kornit Digital (KRNT) -9.4%, Jingbo Technology (SVMB) -486.2%, Thomson Reuters (TRI) 20.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Jingbo Technology (SVMB) returned the most: Kornit Digital (KRNT) +25.8%, Jingbo Technology (SVMB) +26.7%, Thomson Reuters (TRI) -24.9%. Over five years, Thomson Reuters (TRI) compounded fastest (Kornit Digital (KRNT) -35.5%/yr, Thomson Reuters (TRI) -0.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Kornit Digital (KRNT) has been the steadiest (Kornit Digital (KRNT) 43.8%, Jingbo Technology (SVMB) 129.0%, Thomson Reuters (TRI) 51.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, KRNT, SVMB and TRI?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Thomson Reuters (TRI) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.