KRFG vs ACCO vs TBCH Stock Comparison

King Resources, Acco Brands and Turtle Beach Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
KRFG King Resources, Inc.
$0.24 0.0% 1M +200.0% 1Y
Market cap
$2.61M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Toys Consumer Discretionary
1 win
ACCO ACCO BRANDS Corp
$4.36 +3.1% 1M +11.5% 1Y
Market cap
$498.67M
P/E
7.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.57B
Div. yield
–
Toys Consumer Discretionary
5 wins
TBCH Turtle Beach Corp
$16.49 +28.9% 1M -1.3% 1Y
Market cap
$295.69M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$297.77M
Div. yield
–
Consumer Electronics Consumer Discretionary
1 win

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Acco Brands leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Acco Brands 5, King Resources 1, Turtle Beach 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionKRFGACCOTBCHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.61M $498.67M $295.69M ACCO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 7.5x -92.7x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 4.7x 29.4x ACCO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +1.5% -17.5% ACCO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — — -1.1% –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 5.6% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 2.8x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +200.0% +11.5% -1.3% KRFG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -71.1%/yr -12.0%/yr -10.5%/yr TBCH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 180.6% 39.1% 51.3% ACCO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 62/100 60/100 ACCO

Percentile Scorecard

KRFGACCOTBCH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisKRFGACCOTBCH
Valuation 3 #33 of 34 97 #2 of 34 48 #22 of 41
Growth 13 #28 of 32 39 #20 of 32 48 #22 of 41
Profitability – 58 #14 of 32 60 #16 of 38
Financial Health – 28 #24 of 33 51 #21 of 42
Shareholder Returns – 88 #3 of 18 96 #2 of 27
Overall – 62 60
  • KRFG ranked among 34 companies in Leisure Products
  • ACCO ranked among 34 companies in Leisure Products
  • TBCH ranked among 44 companies in Household Durables

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodKRFGACCOTBCHSPY
1 month 0.0%+3.1%+28.9% +0.7%
3 months +4.3%+2.8%+34.5% +3.7%
6 months -65.7%+35.8%+43.1% +7.1%
Year to date -69.6%+16.9%+17.5% +12.8%
1 year +200.0%+11.5%-1.3% +11.9%
3 years -93.1%-13.8%+102.8% +85.2%
3 years, per year -59.1%-4.8%+26.6% +22.8%
5 years -99.8%-47.3%-42.7% +67.6%
5 years, per year -71.1%-12.0%-10.5% +10.9%
10 years -76.0%-60.7%+196.6% +262.0%
10 years, per year -13.3%-8.9%+11.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureKRFGACCOTBCHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 180.6%39.1%51.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 235.1%36.0%48.4% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -1.110.801.77 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.110.29-0.03 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -100.0%-69.8%-78.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -75.0%-6.8%-2.4% -1.2%
52-week high $0.96$4.68$16.90 $779.14
52-week low $0.08$2.84$10.14 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleKRFGACCOTBCH
P/E now vs peer median —median 18.6x 6.2xmedian 18.6x -99.1xmedian 15.8x
P/S now vs peer median —median 1.1x 0.3xmedian 1.1x 1.0xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 10.1x —median 10.1x 16.2xmedian 9.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median -16.6xmedian 11.2x 7.5xmedian 11.2x 9.2xmedian 12.1x
P/B now vs peer median —median 1.5x 0.6xmedian 1.5x 3.7xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.04 1.04median 1.04 -1.57median 0.63

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsKRFGACCOTBCH
Revenue – $1.57B $297.77M
Gross profit – $520.80M $110.81M
Operating income – $90.20M $9.20M
Net income -$2.84M $66.30M -$3.19M
Free cash flow -$157.31K – $32.25M
R&D – – $17.81M
EPS (diluted) – $0.69 $-0.17
Cash & equivalents – $174.70M $19.57M
Total debt – – $80.69M
Shares (diluted) 10.88M 95.60M 19.18M
Enterprise value $2.61M $498.67M $234.59M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricKRFGACCOTBCH
P/E – 6.2x -99.1x
P/FCF -16.6x 7.5x 9.2x
P/Operating cash flow -16.6x 3.1x 8.7x
P/S – 0.3x 1.0x
P/B – 0.6x 3.7x
P/Tangible book – 14.3x 5.9x
EV/EBITDA – – 16.2x
EV/EBIT – – 38.7x
EV/Revenue – 0.3x 1.2x
EV/FCF -16.6x – 11.1x
EV/Operating cash flow -16.6x 3.1x 10.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 1.04 -1.57

Growth

14 metrics
MetricKRFGACCOTBCH
Revenue growth (1Y) – 1.5% -17.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -6.6% 5.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 1.8% -14.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -4.2% 27.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) – -4.3% -70.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 14.6% 30.2%
Net income growth (1Y) -257.5% 63.3% -116.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -30.6% 5.5% 61.9%
EPS growth (1Y) – 59.4% -117.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 5.9% 63.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -72.4% 43.4% 19.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 30.2% -6.2% 13.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -72.4% – 29.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 30.2% – 17.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricKRFGACCOTBCH
Gross margin – – 37.2%
EBITDA margin – – 7.4%
Operating margin – – 3.1%
Pretax margin – – -0.5%
Net margin – – -1.1%
FCF margin – – 10.8%
Operating cash flow margin – 8.3% 11.4%
Return on equity – – -3.3%
Return on assets – – -1.5%
Return on invested capital – – 5.6%
Return on capital employed – – 5.7%
Asset turnover – 0.7x 1.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.1x 2.0x -10.7x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.8% 2.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricKRFGACCOTBCH
Debt / assets – – 37.5%
Debt / equity – – 1.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 2.8x
Debt / FCF – – 2.5x
Liabilities / assets – 69.4% 62.5%
Equity / assets – 30.6% 37.5%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio – 1.9x 2.4x
Quick ratio – – 1.1x
Cash ratio – – 0.4x
Altman Z-score – – 2.43

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricKRFGACCOTBCH
Dividend yield – 6.5% –
Net buyback yield – – 12.8%
Shareholder yield – 6.5% 12.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusKRFGACCOTBCH
Forward P/E – 4.7xFY2026 29.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $0.92FY2026 $0.56FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +9.5%FY2026 -27.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +6.5% +82.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $1.49BFY2026 $360.68MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – -2.1%FY2026 +12.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +3.2% +10.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersKRFGACCOTBCH
Held by institutions – 80.2% 68.8%
Institutions holding – 197 112
Change in shares held, QoQ – +0.1% +3.8%
Institutions buying – 114 58
Institutions selling – 48 37
Buyers to sellers – 2.38 1.57

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

KRFGACCOTBCH
KRFG 1.00 0.02 0.01
ACCO 0.02 1.00 0.22
TBCH 0.01 0.22 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, KRFG, ACCO and TBCH?

Acco Brands (ACCO) is the largest by market capitalisation: King Resources (KRFG) $2.61M, Acco Brands (ACCO) $498.67M, Turtle Beach (TBCH) $295.69M.

Which company is growing faster?

Acco Brands (ACCO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Acco Brands (ACCO) +1.5%, Turtle Beach (TBCH) -17.5%.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year King Resources (KRFG) returned the most: King Resources (KRFG) +200.0%, Acco Brands (ACCO) +11.5%, Turtle Beach (TBCH) -1.3%. Over five years, Turtle Beach (TBCH) compounded fastest (King Resources (KRFG) -71.1%/yr, Acco Brands (ACCO) -12.0%/yr, Turtle Beach (TBCH) -10.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Acco Brands (ACCO) has been the steadiest (King Resources (KRFG) 180.6%, Acco Brands (ACCO) 39.1%, Turtle Beach (TBCH) 51.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, KRFG, ACCO and TBCH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Acco Brands (ACCO) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.