KMT vs SNA vs EMR Stock Comparison

Kennametal, Snap-on and Emerson Electric Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
KMT Kennametal Inc
$29.75 -6.4% 1M +31.2% 1Y
Market cap
$2.29B
P/E
6.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.36B
Div. yield
0.03%
Power Tools Industrials
8 wins
SNA Snap-on Inc
$355.69 -3.7% 1M +3.8% 1Y
Market cap
$18.55B
P/E
18.3x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Power Tools Industrials
3 wins
EMR Emerson Electric Co
$167.78 +5.3% 1M +24.7% 1Y
Market cap
$95.26B
P/E
37.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$18.64B
Div. yield
0.01%
Pumps and Valves Industrials
1 win

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Kennametal leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Kennametal 8, Snap-on 3, Emerson Electric 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionKMTSNAEMRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.29B $18.55B $95.26B EMR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 6.7x 18.3x 37.0x KMT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 5.7x 19.4x 24.9x KMT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +19.8% — +4.8% KMT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 14.5% — 13.8% KMT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 16.5% — 10.9% KMT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.0x — 1.8x KMT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.03% 0.00% 0.01% KMT
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +31.2% +3.8% +24.7% KMT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -5.6%/yr +11.9%/yr +11.6%/yr SNA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 44.3% 19.1% 31.8% SNA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 65/100 66/100 45/100 SNA

Percentile Scorecard

KMTSNAEMR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisKMTSNAEMR
Valuation 72 #57 of 203 55 #93 of 203 33 #136 of 203
Growth 77 #44 of 188 33 #127 of 188 39 #115 of 188
Profitability 68 #59 of 184 67 #61 of 184 87 #25 of 184
Financial Health 52 #104 of 217 87 #30 of 217 30 #153 of 217
Shareholder Returns 55 #69 of 153 88 #20 of 153 37 #97 of 153
Overall 65 66 45
  • KMT ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • SNA ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • EMR ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodKMTSNAEMRSPY
1 month -6.4%-3.7%+5.3% +0.9%
3 months -11.4%-14.3%+15.1% +5.9%
6 months -22.8%-6.0%+22.9% +8.5%
Year to date +4.7%+3.2%+26.4% +13.3%
1 year +31.2%+3.8%+24.7% +12.4%
3 years +32.2%+41.0%+90.6% +88.1%
3 years, per year +9.8%+12.1%+24.0% +23.5%
5 years -25.2%+75.0%+73.0% +68.2%
5 years, per year -5.6%+11.9%+11.6% +11.0%
10 years +7.8%+132.2%+235.0% +263.4%
10 years, per year +0.8%+8.8%+12.9% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureKMTSNAEMRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 44.3%19.1%31.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 42.0%19.4%33.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.310.581.54 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.700.200.78 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -57.4%-21.3%-29.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -31.2%-15.2%0.0% -0.9%
52-week high $43.27$419.26$167.78 $779.14
52-week low $21.95$328.69$123.30 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleKMTSNAEMR
P/E now vs peer median 6.6xmedian 25.4x 18.2xmedian 25.4x 36.4xmedian 25.4x
P/S now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 1.9x 3.6xmedian 1.9x 5.0xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 4.7xmedian 14.3x —median 14.3x 17.0xmedian 14.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median -28.0xmedian 21.8x 17.2xmedian 21.8x 27.0xmedian 21.8x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 2.2x 3.0xmedian 2.2x 4.6xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.15median 1.41 12.76median 1.41 -0.88median 1.41

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsKMTSNAEMR
Revenue $2.36B – $18.64B
Gross profit $969.96M – $9.91B
Operating income $472.53M $1.31B $4.68B
Net income $350.41M $1.04B $2.58B
Free cash flow -$80.91M – $3.46B
EPS (diluted) $4.42 $19.25 $4.59
Cash & equivalents $95.79M $1.67B $2.18B
Total debt $717.45M – $13.11B
Shares (diluted) 77.42M 52.52M 561.10M
Enterprise value $1.86B $18.55B $88.00B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricKMTSNAEMR
P/E 6.6x 18.2x 36.4x
P/FCF -28.0x 17.2x 27.0x
P/Operating cash flow -565.7x 15.9x 23.9x
P/S 1.0x 3.6x 5.0x
P/B 1.4x 3.0x 4.6x
P/Tangible book 1.5x 3.1x 8.0x
EV/EBITDA 4.7x – 17.0x
EV/EBIT 6.1x – 22.4x
EV/Revenue 1.2x – 5.6x
EV/FCF -35.7x – 30.2x
EV/Operating cash flow -720.9x 15.9x 26.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.15 12.76 -0.88

Growth

14 metrics
MetricKMTSNAEMR
Revenue growth (1Y) 19.8% – 4.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 4.3% – 7.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 62.2% – 5.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 14.5% – 11.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 230.2% -0.7% 9.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 34.9% 0.4% 13.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 255.0% -0.3% -3.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 41.6% 0.6% -42.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 269.9% 0.4% -2.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 44.8% 1.4% -41.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -101.9% 4.4% 4.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -26.3% 2.7% 10.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -167.8% – 4.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -35.6% – 9.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricKMTSNAEMR
Gross margin 41.2% – 53.2%
EBITDA margin 26.1% – 33.1%
Operating margin 20.1% – 25.1%
Pretax margin 19.6% – 17.6%
Net margin 14.5% – 13.8%
FCF margin -3.4% – 18.6%
Operating cash flow margin -0.2% – 21.0%
Return on equity 23.3% 17.0% 12.7%
Return on assets 11.9% 12.0% 6.1%
Return on invested capital 16.5% – 10.9%
Return on capital employed 20.8% – 14.9%
Asset turnover 0.8x – 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.0x 1.1x 1.5x
Stock comp / revenue 1.5% – 1.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricKMTSNAEMR
Debt / assets 22.7% – 31.1%
Debt / equity 0.4x – 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.0x – 1.8x
Debt / FCF -8.9x – 3.8x
Liabilities / assets 49.1% 29.3% 51.7%
Equity / assets 50.9% 70.7% 48.3%
Interest coverage 16.5x – –
Current ratio 2.6x 3.5x 0.9x
Quick ratio 0.7x – 0.5x
Cash ratio 0.1x – 0.2x
Altman Z-score 3.18 – 4.73

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricKMTSNAEMR
Dividend yield 2.7% 2.7% 1.3%
Net buyback yield 0.8% – 1.0%
Shareholder yield 3.5% 2.7% 2.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) 17.4% – 47.8%
Payout ratio (FCF) -75.2% – 35.6%
Dividend growth (1Y) -1.6% – 3.1%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -1.9% – 0.7%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusKMTSNAEMR
Forward P/E 5.7xFY2027 19.4xFY2026 24.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $5.25FY2027 $18.35FY2026 $6.75FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +14.9%FY2027 -4.4%FY2026 +12.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -57.9% +17.5% +15.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.22BFY2027 $4.58BFY2026 $18.13BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +36.5%FY2027 -3.4%FY2026 +0.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +13.7% +14.2% +15.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersKMTSNAEMR
Held by institutions 100.0% 96.3% 82.1%
Institutions holding 337 1,069 2,291
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.5% +2.8% +0.9%
Institutions buying 198 497 1,081
Institutions selling 95 370 798
Buyers to sellers 2.08 1.34 1.35

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

KMTSNAEMR
KMT 1.00 0.46 0.45
SNA 0.46 1.00 0.56
EMR 0.45 0.56 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, KMT, SNA and EMR?

Emerson Electric (EMR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Kennametal (KMT) $2.29B, Snap-on (SNA) $18.55B, Emerson Electric (EMR) $95.26B.

Which stock is cheaper, KMT, SNA and EMR?

Kennametal (KMT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Kennametal (KMT) 6.7x, Snap-on (SNA) 18.3x, Emerson Electric (EMR) 37.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Kennametal (KMT) is cheapest (Kennametal (KMT) 5.7x, Snap-on (SNA) 19.4x, Emerson Electric (EMR) 24.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Kennametal (KMT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Kennametal (KMT) +19.8%, Emerson Electric (EMR) +4.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Kennametal (KMT) has the highest net margin (Kennametal (KMT) 14.5%, Emerson Electric (EMR) 13.8%). On return on invested capital, Kennametal (KMT) leads (Kennametal (KMT) 16.5%, Emerson Electric (EMR) 10.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Kennametal (KMT) returned the most: Kennametal (KMT) +31.2%, Snap-on (SNA) +3.8%, Emerson Electric (EMR) +24.7%. Over five years, Snap-on (SNA) compounded fastest (Kennametal (KMT) -5.6%/yr, Snap-on (SNA) +11.9%/yr, Emerson Electric (EMR) +11.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Kennametal (KMT) has the highest dividend yield: Kennametal (KMT) 0.03%, Snap-on (SNA) 0.00%, Emerson Electric (EMR) 0.01%. Snap-on (SNA) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Snap-on (SNA) has been the steadiest (Kennametal (KMT) 44.3%, Snap-on (SNA) 19.1%, Emerson Electric (EMR) 31.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, KMT, SNA and EMR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Kennametal (KMT) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.