KMB vs PG vs RAJAF Stock Comparison

Kimberly Clark, Procter & Gamble and TFA Therapeutics Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
KMB Kimberly Clark Corp
$108.40 +9.7% 1M -10.2% 1Y
Market cap
$36.05B
P/E
18.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$16.58B
Div. yield
4.70%
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples
4 wins
PG PROCTER & GAMBLE Co
$158.37 +6.3% 1M +4.6% 1Y
Market cap
$367.07B
P/E
23.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$87.92B
Div. yield
2.73%
Household Products Consumer Staples
7 wins
RAJAF TFA Therapeutics, Inc.
$9.18 0.0% 1M 0.0% 1Y
Market cap
$1.02B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples
1 win

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Procter & Gamble leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Procter & Gamble 7, Kimberly Clark 4, TFA Therapeutics 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionKMBPGRAJAFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $36.05B $367.07B $1.02B PG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 18.4x 23.0x -6,589x KMB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 14.2x 23.5x — KMB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +0.7% +3.5% — PG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 11.8% 18.2% — PG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 19.4% 17.2% — KMB
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.7x 1.0x — PG
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 4.70% 2.73% — KMB
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -10.2% +4.6% 0.0% PG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -3.5%/yr +2.1%/yr — PG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 29.4% 20.9% 0.0% RAJAF
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 54/100 56/100 — PG

Percentile Scorecard

KMBPGRAJAF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisKMBPGRAJAF
Valuation 57 #23 of 52 41 #31 of 52 28 #38 of 52
Growth 45 #28 of 50 53 #24 of 50 –
Profitability 82 #9 of 45 91 #5 of 45 –
Financial Health 38 #35 of 56 60 #23 of 56 9 #51 of 56
Shareholder Returns 50 #16 of 31 37 #20 of 31 –
Overall 54 56 –
  • KMB ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products
  • PG ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products
  • RAJAF ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodKMBPGRAJAFSPY
1 month +9.7%+6.3%0.0% +0.9%
3 months -4.2%+8.4%0.0% +5.9%
6 months +12.8%+8.1%0.0% +8.5%
Year to date +7.4%+10.5%0.0% +13.3%
1 year -10.2%+4.6%0.0% +12.4%
3 years -7.2%+7.6%— +88.1%
3 years, per year -2.5%+2.5%— +23.5%
5 years -16.3%+10.8%— +68.2%
5 years, per year -3.5%+2.1%— +11.0%
10 years -5.4%+82.4%— +263.4%
10 years, per year -0.6%+6.2%— +13.8%

Risk

MeasureKMBPGRAJAFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 29.4%20.9%0.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 32.7%20.3%— 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.02-0.080.00 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.350.22— 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -37.3%-24.6%-18.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -10.2%-5.3%0.0% -0.9%
52-week high $120.66$167.20$9.18 $779.14
52-week low $93.05$138.04$9.18 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleKMBPGRAJAF
P/E now vs peer median 18.4xmedian 18.4x 23.0xmedian 18.4x -6,589xmedian 18.4x
P/S now vs peer median 2.2xmedian 1.6x 4.2xmedian 1.6x 819.1xmedian 1.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 12.8xmedian 12.8x 17.0xmedian 12.8x —median 12.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 19.8xmedian 18.7x 23.9xmedian 18.7x -28,458xmedian 18.7x
P/B now vs peer median 19.2xmedian 2.1x 6.6xmedian 2.1x -1,908xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median 2.80median 0.97 8.66median 0.97 —median 0.97

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsKMBPGRAJAF
Revenue $16.58B $87.92B –
Gross profit $6.10B $43.77B –
Operating income $2.51B $19.83B –
Net income $1.99B $16.12B –
Free cash flow $1.82B $15.34B –
EPS (diluted) $5.87 $6.66 –
Cash & equivalents $956.00M $15.37B $3.20K
Total debt $6.52B $38.93B $12.27M
Shares (diluted) 333.30M 2.41B 111.12M
Enterprise value $33.37B $318.87B $1.02B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricKMBPGRAJAF
P/E 18.4x 23.0x -6,589x
P/FCF 19.8x 23.9x -28,458x
P/Operating cash flow 10.8x 18.4x –
P/S 2.2x 4.2x 819.1x
P/B 19.2x 6.6x -1,908x
P/Tangible book 20.0x 10.8x -1,908x
EV/EBITDA 12.8x 17.0x –
EV/EBIT 16.6x 19.7x –
EV/Revenue 2.5x 4.4x –
EV/FCF 22.9x 25.5x –
EV/Operating cash flow 12.5x 19.6x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.80 8.66 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricKMBPGRAJAF
Revenue growth (1Y) 0.7% 3.5% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -6.7% 1.8% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 2.0% 1.1% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -2.8% 2.3% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -5.8% -3.3% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 3.5% 1.5% –
Net income growth (1Y) -18.9% -4.4% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 6.5% 1.7% –
EPS growth (1Y) -19.5% -3.2% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 6.6% 2.7% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 16.1% 5.2% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 1.5% 4.0% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -13.4% 2.7% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -8.7% 1.7% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricKMBPGRAJAF
Gross margin 36.8% 49.8% –
EBITDA margin 19.5% 26.2% –
Operating margin 15.2% 22.6% –
Pretax margin 13.5% 23.2% –
Net margin 11.8% 18.2% –
FCF margin 11.0% 17.4% –
Operating cash flow margin 20.1% 22.7% –
Return on equity 105.0% 29.4% –
Return on assets 11.1% 12.4% –
Return on invested capital 19.4% 17.2% –
Return on capital employed 23.1% 23.4% –
Asset turnover 0.9x 0.7x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.7x 1.2x –
Stock comp / revenue 0.8% 0.6% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricKMBPGRAJAF
Debt / assets 35.1% 29.2% 96.1%
Debt / equity 3.5x 0.7x -8.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.7x 1.0x –
Debt / FCF 3.6x 2.5x –
Liabilities / assets 89.9% 58.4% 111.5%
Equity / assets 10.1% 41.6% -11.5%
Interest coverage 10.7x 22.0x –
Current ratio 0.9x 0.7x 0.2x
Quick ratio 0.4x 0.5x 0.0x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.3x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 3.33 5.32 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricKMBPGRAJAF
Dividend yield 4.7% 2.7% –
Net buyback yield 0.0% 0.9% –
Shareholder yield 4.8% 3.6% –
Payout ratio (earnings) 84.4% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 92.3% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 2.2% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusKMBPGRAJAF
Forward P/E 14.2xFY2026 23.5xFY2027 –
EPS, next fiscal year $7.64FY2026 $6.75FY2027 –
EPS growth, next FY +1.5%FY2026 -2.0%FY2027 –
EPS growth, the year after -8.0% +16.7% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $16.99BFY2026 $86.09BFY2027 –
Revenue growth, next FY +3.3%FY2026 -1.1%FY2027 –
Revenue growth, the year after +5.2% +0.1% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersKMBPGRAJAF
Held by institutions 96.8% 69.8% –
Institutions holding 1,711 4,029 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +9.1% +2.1% –
Institutions buying 828 1,875 –
Institutions selling 620 1,698 –
Buyers to sellers 1.34 1.10 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

KMBPGRAJAF
KMB 1.00 0.56 –
PG 0.56 1.00 –
RAJAF – – –

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, KMB, PG and RAJAF?

Procter & Gamble (PG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Kimberly Clark (KMB) $36.05B, Procter & Gamble (PG) $367.07B, TFA Therapeutics (RAJAF) $1.02B.

Which stock is cheaper, KMB, PG and RAJAF?

Kimberly Clark (KMB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Kimberly Clark (KMB) 18.4x, Procter & Gamble (PG) 23.0x, TFA Therapeutics (RAJAF) -6,589x). On next year's consensus earnings, Kimberly Clark (KMB) is cheapest (Kimberly Clark (KMB) 14.2x, Procter & Gamble (PG) 23.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Procter & Gamble (PG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Kimberly Clark (KMB) +0.7%, Procter & Gamble (PG) +3.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Procter & Gamble (PG) has the highest net margin (Kimberly Clark (KMB) 11.8%, Procter & Gamble (PG) 18.2%). On return on invested capital, Kimberly Clark (KMB) leads (Kimberly Clark (KMB) 19.4%, Procter & Gamble (PG) 17.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Procter & Gamble (PG) returned the most: Kimberly Clark (KMB) -10.2%, Procter & Gamble (PG) +4.6%, TFA Therapeutics (RAJAF) 0.0%. Over five years, Procter & Gamble (PG) compounded fastest (Kimberly Clark (KMB) -3.5%/yr, Procter & Gamble (PG) +2.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Kimberly Clark (KMB) has the highest dividend yield: Kimberly Clark (KMB) 4.70%, Procter & Gamble (PG) 2.73%. TFA Therapeutics (RAJAF) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, TFA Therapeutics (RAJAF) has been the steadiest (Kimberly Clark (KMB) 29.4%, Procter & Gamble (PG) 20.9%, TFA Therapeutics (RAJAF) 0.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, KMB, PG and RAJAF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Procter & Gamble (PG) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.