KLAC vs NVMI vs TER Stock Comparison

Kla, Nova and Teradyne Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
KLAC Kla Corp
$149.21 -20.6% 1M +26.1% 1Y
Market cap
$200.43B
P/E
41.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$13.58B
Div. yield
0.01%
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
5 wins
NVMI Nova Ltd.
$316.33 -14.1% 1M -8.3% 1Y
Market cap
$9.86B
P/E
36.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$937.50M
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
2 wins
TER Teradyne, Inc
$309.00 -22.4% 1M +114.2% 1Y
Market cap
$50.73B
P/E
44.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.46B
Div. yield
–
Test and Measurement Technology
3 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Kla leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Kla 5, Teradyne 3, Nova 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionKLACNVMITERLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $200.43B $9.86B $50.73B KLAC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 41.5x 36.5x 44.1x NVMI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 26.3x 28.0x 32.0x KLAC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +11.7% +16.2% +57.9% TER
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 35.6% 28.8% 25.8% KLAC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 40.7% — 35.3% KLAC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.7x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +26.1% -8.3% +114.2% TER
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +34.4%/yr +25.4%/yr +20.2%/yr KLAC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 61.5% 59.5% 78.7% NVMI
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 59/100 55/100 65/100 TER

Percentile Scorecard

KLACNVMITER

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisKLACNVMITER
Valuation 38 #59 of 95 59 #40 of 95 22 #87 of 111
Growth 54 #43 of 93 69 #30 of 93 89 #13 of 108
Profitability 97 #4 of 91 76 #23 of 91 93 #8 of 104
Financial Health 22 #79 of 101 16 #85 of 101 71 #34 of 115
Shareholder Returns 85 #12 of 75 – 51 #40 of 81
Overall 59 55 65
  • KLAC ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors
  • NVMI ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors
  • TER ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodKLACNVMITERSPY
1 month -20.6%-14.1%-22.4% -0.8%
3 months -26.6%-26.2%-7.7% +3.5%
6 months -21.5%-40.3%-23.1% +7.0%
Year to date +22.8%-3.7%+59.6% +12.2%
1 year +26.1%-8.3%+114.2% +13.0%
3 years +225.8%+248.2%+268.6% +86.3%
3 years, per year +48.3%+51.6%+54.5% +23.1%
5 years +338.1%+209.9%+151.1% +68.6%
5 years, per year +34.4%+25.4%+20.2% +11.0%
10 years +1,881.8%+2,480.2%+1,303.3% +258.0%
10 years, per year +34.8%+38.4%+30.2% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureKLACNVMITERSPY
Volatility, 1Y 61.5%59.5%78.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 65.4%67.7%85.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.792.893.37 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.43-0.141.45 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -51.7%-52.8%-59.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -50.5%-47.8%-36.1% -1.8%
52-week high $301.71$605.65$483.84 $779.14
52-week low $109.71$275.78$144.38 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleKLACNVMITER
P/E now vs peer median 40.5xmedian 42.1x 35.2xmedian 42.1x 42.0xmedian 32.0x
P/S now vs peer median 14.4xmedian 7.1x 10.7xmedian 7.1x 10.8xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 32.9xmedian 27.5x 32.5xmedian 27.5x 32.0xmedian 19.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 51.8xmedian 37.2x 41.1xmedian 37.2x 62.8xmedian 29.0x
P/B now vs peer median 30.7xmedian 4.2x 6.9xmedian 4.2x 13.9xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median 2.73median 2.23 1.43median 2.23 1.45median 1.13

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsKLACNVMITER
Revenue $13.58B $937.50M $4.46B
Gross profit $8.32B $535.50M $2.64B
Operating income $5.66B $271.61M $1.35B
Net income $4.83B $270.51M $1.15B
Free cash flow $3.77B $244.83M $769.75M
R&D $1.53B $151.05M $559.87M
EPS (diluted) $3.66 $8.24 $7.29
Cash & equivalents $1.65B $124.85M $349.54M
Total debt $5.89B – –
Shares (diluted) 1.32B 32.80M 157.69M
Enterprise value $192.59B $7.02B $49.51B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricKLACNVMITER
P/E 40.5x 35.2x 42.0x
P/FCF 51.8x 41.1x 62.8x
P/Operating cash flow 47.1x 44.4x 45.4x
P/S 14.4x 10.7x 10.8x
P/B 30.7x 6.9x 13.9x
P/Tangible book 32.0x 7.1x 14.3x
EV/EBITDA 32.9x 32.5x 32.0x
EV/EBIT 35.2x 34.7x 35.5x
EV/Revenue 14.7x 10.1x 10.7x
EV/FCF 52.9x 38.5x 62.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 48.1x 41.6x 45.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.73 1.43 1.45

Growth

14 metrics
MetricKLACNVMITER
Revenue growth (1Y) 11.7% 16.2% 57.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 9.0% 19.5% 16.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 12.4% 16.2% 58.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 9.9% 20.0% 16.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) 12.9% 16.3% 160.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 12.3% 24.6% 28.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 18.9% 15.2% 145.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 12.6% 25.8% 27.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 20.5% 12.8% 149.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 14.9% 24.6% 29.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 1.5% -1.4% 34.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 4.1% 20.7% 19.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 0.5% -3.4% 38.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 4.2% 18.2% 18.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricKLACNVMITER
Gross margin 61.3% 57.1% 59.2%
EBITDA margin 44.6% 31.0% 33.5%
Operating margin 41.7% 29.0% 30.2%
Pretax margin 41.3% 34.1% 30.2%
Net margin 35.6% 28.8% 25.8%
FCF margin 27.7% 26.1% 17.2%
Operating cash flow margin 30.5% 24.1% 23.9%
Return on equity 79.3% 19.0% 35.2%
Return on assets 27.7% 11.0% 24.9%
Return on invested capital 40.7% – 35.3%
Return on capital employed 43.2% 17.9% 37.8%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.4x 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x 0.8x 0.9x
Stock comp / revenue 2.3% 2.8% 1.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricKLACNVMITER
Debt / assets 32.8% – –
Debt / equity 0.9x – –
Net debt / EBITDA 0.7x – –
Debt / FCF 1.6x – –
Liabilities / assets 64.6% 41.1% 29.5%
Equity / assets 35.4% 58.9% 70.5%
Interest coverage 19.9x – 118.8x
Current ratio 2.9x 1.6x 2.1x
Quick ratio 1.1x 0.9x 1.3x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.7x 0.3x
Altman Z-score 12.71 – 22.48

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricKLACNVMITER
Dividend yield 0.6% – 0.2%
Net buyback yield 1.1% – 1.0%
Shareholder yield 1.7% – 1.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) 21.9% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 28.1% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 17.2% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 13.1% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusKLACNVMITER
Forward P/E 26.3xFY2027 28.0xFY2026 32.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $5.67FY2027 $11.30FY2026 $9.65FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +50.8%FY2027 +31.1%FY2026 +143.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +16.6% +17.2% +25.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $19.18BFY2027 $1.15BFY2026 $5.01BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +41.2%FY2027 +30.3%FY2026 +57.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +8.6% +23.9% +18.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersKLACNVMITER
Held by institutions 91.0% 69.0% 97.3%
Institutions holding 2,478 343 1,419
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.2% -4.1% +5.2%
Institutions buying 1,285 175 828
Institutions selling 982 129 456
Buyers to sellers 1.31 1.36 1.82

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

KLACNVMITER
KLAC 1.00 0.84 0.71
NVMI 0.84 1.00 0.73
TER 0.71 0.73 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, KLAC, NVMI and TER?

Kla (KLAC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Kla (KLAC) $200.43B, Nova (NVMI) $9.86B, Teradyne (TER) $50.73B.

Which stock is cheaper, KLAC, NVMI and TER?

Nova (NVMI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Kla (KLAC) 41.5x, Nova (NVMI) 36.5x, Teradyne (TER) 44.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Kla (KLAC) is cheapest (Kla (KLAC) 26.3x, Nova (NVMI) 28.0x, Teradyne (TER) 32.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Teradyne (TER) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Kla (KLAC) +11.7%, Nova (NVMI) +16.2%, Teradyne (TER) +57.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Kla (KLAC) has the highest net margin (Kla (KLAC) 35.6%, Nova (NVMI) 28.8%, Teradyne (TER) 25.8%). On return on invested capital, Kla (KLAC) leads (Kla (KLAC) 40.7%, Teradyne (TER) 35.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Teradyne (TER) returned the most: Kla (KLAC) +26.1%, Nova (NVMI) -8.3%, Teradyne (TER) +114.2%. Over five years, Kla (KLAC) compounded fastest (Kla (KLAC) +34.4%/yr, Nova (NVMI) +25.4%/yr, Teradyne (TER) +20.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Kla (KLAC) 0.01%, Nova (NVMI) 0.00%, Teradyne (TER) 0.00%. Nova (NVMI) and Teradyne (TER) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Nova (NVMI) has been the steadiest (Kla (KLAC) 61.5%, Nova (NVMI) 59.5%, Teradyne (TER) 78.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, KLAC, NVMI and TER?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Kla (KLAC) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.