KLAC vs EMR vs CAMT Stock Comparison

Kla, Emerson Electric and Camtek Prices as of Nov 3, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ACLS) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
KLAC Kla Corp
$156.20 -24.5% 1M +28.1% 1Y
Market cap
$192.65B
P/E
36.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$14.51B
Div. yield
0.01%
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
9 wins
EMR Emerson Electric Co
$166.38 +3.0% 1M +18.8% 1Y
Market cap
$95.00B
P/E
36.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$18.64B
Div. yield
0.01%
Pumps and Valves Industrials
3 wins
CAMT Camtek Ltd
$112.37 -32.0% 1M -9.0% 1Y
Market cap
$4.62B
P/E
122.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$509.02M
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Equipment Technology

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Kla leads on 9 of the 12 questions below (Kla 9, Emerson Electric 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionKLACEMRCAMTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $192.65B $95.00B $4.62B KLAC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 36.6x 36.8x 122.6x KLAC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 27.5x 24.6x 32.5x EMR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +15.8% +4.8% +7.9% KLAC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 36.2% 13.8% 7.4% KLAC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 43.4% 10.9% — KLAC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.6x 1.8x — KLAC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.01% 0.00% EMR
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +28.1% +18.8% -9.0% KLAC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +30.8%/yr +11.4%/yr +21.7%/yr KLAC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 62.0% 31.9% 72.0% EMR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 59/100 45/100 43/100 KLAC

Percentile Scorecard

KLACEMRCAMT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisKLACEMRCAMT
Valuation 43 #54 of 94 35 #134 of 204 39 #58 of 94
Growth 53 #44 of 92 40 #116 of 191 30 #65 of 92
Profitability 97 #4 of 90 86 #28 of 189 49 #46 of 90
Financial Health 20 #81 of 101 31 #154 of 221 53 #48 of 101
Shareholder Returns 83 #14 of 79 34 #105 of 158 –
Overall 59 45 43
  • KLAC ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • EMR ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • CAMT ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodKLACEMRCAMTSPY
1 month -24.5%+3.0%-32.0% -2.0%
3 months -20.1%+4.7%-25.9% -2.2%
6 months -9.9%+20.2%-43.0% +4.2%
Year to date +28.6%+25.4%+5.7% +10.6%
1 year +28.1%+18.8%-9.0% +10.4%
3 years +212.6%+80.9%+99.0% +73.6%
3 years, per year +46.3%+21.9%+25.8% +20.2%
5 years +281.8%+71.2%+167.2% +61.6%
5 years, per year +30.8%+11.4%+21.7% +10.1%
10 years +1,991.6%+233.8%+3,856.7% +261.3%
10 years, per year +35.5%+12.8%+44.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureKLACEMRCAMTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 62.0%31.9%72.0% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 66.4%33.7%76.0% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.821.552.92 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.450.59-0.12 0.81
Max drawdown, 5Y -51.7%-29.9%-63.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -48.2%-2.6%-45.8% -3.2%
52-week high $301.71$170.76$207.46 $779.14
52-week low $109.71$123.30$94.40 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleKLACEMRCAMT
P/E now vs peer median 38.8xmedian 41.4x 36.1xmedian 25.4x 136.3xmedian 41.4x
P/S now vs peer median 14.0xmedian 6.6x 5.0xmedian 1.9x 10.1xmedian 6.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 31.6xmedian 26.6x 16.8xmedian 14.5x —median 26.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 50.4xmedian 39.1x 26.8xmedian 23.6x —median 39.1x
P/B now vs peer median 31.2xmedian 4.2x 4.6xmedian 2.2x 7.3xmedian 4.2x
PEG now vs peer median 1.84median 1.84 -0.87median 1.21 -6.14median 1.84

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsKLACEMRCAMT
Revenue $14.51B $18.64B $509.02M
Gross profit $8.92B $9.91B $254.77M
Operating income $6.19B $4.68B $118.02M
Net income $5.26B $2.58B $56.14M
Free cash flow $4.04B $3.46B –
R&D $1.57B – $57.52M
EPS (diluted) $4.01 $4.59 $0.76
Cash & equivalents $1.53B $2.18B $215.23M
Total debt $5.72B $13.11B –
Shares (diluted) 1.31B 561.10M 49.37M
Enterprise value $185.23B $87.74B $3.51B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricKLACEMRCAMT
P/E 38.8x 36.1x 136.3x
P/FCF 50.4x 26.8x –
P/Operating cash flow 45.1x 23.7x –
P/S 14.0x 5.0x 10.1x
P/B 31.2x 4.6x 7.3x
P/Tangible book 32.2x 7.9x 7.4x
EV/EBITDA 31.6x 16.8x –
EV/EBIT 33.6x 22.2x 41.1x
EV/Revenue 14.3x 5.6x 9.5x
EV/FCF 51.4x 30.0x –
EV/Operating cash flow 46.0x 26.5x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.84 -0.87 -6.14

Growth

14 metrics
MetricKLACEMRCAMT
Revenue growth (1Y) 15.8% 4.8% 7.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 12.6% 7.6% 17.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 16.1% 5.7% 7.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 13.8% 11.0% 19.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) 18.2% 9.2% -6.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 17.8% 13.6% 18.9%
Net income growth (1Y) 24.1% -3.0% -65.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 19.2% -42.0% -16.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 25.3% -2.2% -71.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 21.0% -41.6% -22.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 6.2% 4.4% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 8.4% 10.1% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 4.1% 4.4% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 7.9% 9.4% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricKLACEMRCAMT
Gross margin 61.5% 53.2% 50.1%
EBITDA margin 45.4% 33.1% –
Operating margin 42.6% 25.1% 23.2%
Pretax margin 42.2% 17.6% 9.2%
Net margin 36.2% 13.8% 7.4%
FCF margin 27.8% 18.6% –
Operating cash flow margin 31.1% 21.0% –
Return on equity 81.7% 12.7% 8.1%
Return on assets 28.9% 6.1% 4.3%
Return on invested capital 43.4% 10.9% –
Return on capital employed 45.4% 14.9% 9.9%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.4x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x 1.5x –
Stock comp / revenue 2.2% 1.3% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricKLACEMRCAMT
Debt / assets 31.1% 31.1% –
Debt / equity 0.9x 0.6x –
Net debt / EBITDA 0.6x 1.8x –
Debt / FCF 1.4x 3.8x –
Liabilities / assets 64.6% 51.7% 47.0%
Equity / assets 35.4% 48.3% 53.0%
Interest coverage 22.0x – –
Current ratio 2.8x 0.9x 7.4x
Quick ratio 1.0x 0.5x 3.6x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.2x 2.4x
Altman Z-score 13.00 4.71 6.76

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricKLACEMRCAMT
Dividend yield 0.3% 1.3% –
Net buyback yield 1.3% 1.0% –
Shareholder yield 1.6% 2.3% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) 21.1% 47.8% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 27.5% 35.6% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 15.7% 3.1% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 15.2% 0.7% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusKLACEMRCAMT
Forward P/E 27.5xFY2027 24.6xFY2026 32.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $5.67FY2027 $6.75FY2026 $3.46FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +50.8%FY2027 +12.5%FY2026 +6.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +16.6% +15.3% +53.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $19.18BFY2027 $18.13BFY2026 $568.64MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +41.2%FY2027 +0.6%FY2026 +14.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +8.6% +15.3% +42.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersKLACEMRCAMT
Held by institutions 91.0% 82.1% 41.7%
Institutions holding 2,483 2,294 235
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.2% +0.9% -12.5%
Institutions buying 1,288 1,083 126
Institutions selling 984 799 68
Buyers to sellers 1.31 1.36 1.85

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

KLACEMRCAMT
KLAC 1.00 0.51 0.74
EMR 0.51 1.00 0.45
CAMT 0.74 0.45 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, KLAC, EMR and CAMT?

Kla (KLAC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Kla (KLAC) $192.65B, Emerson Electric (EMR) $95.00B, Camtek (CAMT) $4.62B.

Which stock is cheaper, KLAC, EMR and CAMT?

Kla (KLAC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Kla (KLAC) 36.6x, Emerson Electric (EMR) 36.8x, Camtek (CAMT) 122.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Emerson Electric (EMR) is cheapest (Kla (KLAC) 27.5x, Emerson Electric (EMR) 24.6x, Camtek (CAMT) 32.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Kla (KLAC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Kla (KLAC) +15.8%, Emerson Electric (EMR) +4.8%, Camtek (CAMT) +7.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Kla (KLAC) has the highest net margin (Kla (KLAC) 36.2%, Emerson Electric (EMR) 13.8%, Camtek (CAMT) 7.4%). On return on invested capital, Kla (KLAC) leads (Kla (KLAC) 43.4%, Emerson Electric (EMR) 10.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Kla (KLAC) returned the most: Kla (KLAC) +28.1%, Emerson Electric (EMR) +18.8%, Camtek (CAMT) -9.0%. Over five years, Kla (KLAC) compounded fastest (Kla (KLAC) +30.8%/yr, Emerson Electric (EMR) +11.4%/yr, Camtek (CAMT) +21.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Emerson Electric (EMR) has the highest dividend yield: Kla (KLAC) 0.01%, Emerson Electric (EMR) 0.01%, Camtek (CAMT) 0.00%. Camtek (CAMT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Emerson Electric (EMR) has been the steadiest (Kla (KLAC) 62.0%, Emerson Electric (EMR) 31.9%, Camtek (CAMT) 72.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, KLAC, EMR and CAMT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Kla (KLAC) leads on 9. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.