KKR vs FNV vs BAM Stock Comparison

Kkr, Franco Nevada and Brookfield Asset Management Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
KKR KKR & Co. Inc.
$93.04 -0.2% 1M -22.9% 1Y
Market cap
$85.66B
P/E
28.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$21.31B
Div. yield
0.01%
Alternative Asset Managers Financial Services
3 wins
FNV FRANCO NEVADA Corp
$238.73 -2.9% 1M +27.7% 1Y
Market cap
$44.59B
P/E
30.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.32B
Div. yield
0.01%
Alternative Asset Managers Financial Services
5 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Franco Nevada leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Franco Nevada 5, Brookfield Asset Management 4, Kkr 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionKKRFNVBAMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $85.66B $44.59B $77.48B KKR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 28.6x 30.6x 27.6x BAM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 10.9x 30.5x 27.2x KKR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +31.1% +73.6% +31.9% FNV
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 14.0% 62.8% 48.9% FNV
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.0% — 26.8% BAM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.5x — 0.5x BAM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.01% 0.00% KKR
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -22.9% +27.7% -14.1% FNV
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +3.2%/yr +10.8%/yr — FNV
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 38.1% 38.9% 30.2% BAM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 59/100 80/100 73/100 FNV

Percentile Scorecard

KKRFNVBAM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisKKRFNVBAM
Valuation 81 #36 of 181 56 #80 of 181 59 #75 of 181
Growth 79 #24 of 111 91 #11 of 111 86 #17 of 111
Profitability 54 #60 of 129 98 #3 of 129 93 #10 of 129
Financial Health 33 #111 of 164 98 #5 of 164 63 #61 of 164
Shareholder Returns 49 #39 of 76 59 #32 of 76 67 #26 of 76
Overall 59 80 73
  • KKR ranked among 209 companies in Asset and Wealth Management
  • FNV ranked among 209 companies in Asset and Wealth Management
  • BAM ranked among 209 companies in Asset and Wealth Management

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodKKRFNVBAMSPY
1 month -0.2%-2.9%+6.4% +0.9%
3 months -6.3%+11.4%+0.0% +5.9%
6 months -6.3%+4.5%+2.9% +8.5%
Year to date -27.0%+15.2%-9.6% +13.3%
1 year -22.9%+27.7%-14.1% +12.4%
3 years +72.0%+73.7%+63.7% +88.1%
3 years, per year +19.8%+20.2%+17.9% +23.5%
5 years +16.8%+67.1%— +68.2%
5 years, per year +3.2%+10.8%— +11.0%
10 years +541.2%+271.9%— +263.4%
10 years, per year +20.4%+14.0%— +13.8%

Risk

MeasureKKRFNVBAMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 38.1%38.9%30.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 40.7%42.2%31.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.461.261.32 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.600.71-0.47 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -49.8%-38.2%-32.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -34.8%-15.0%-15.2% -0.9%
52-week high $142.77$280.82$55.85 $779.14
52-week low $83.88$184.71$42.87 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleKKRFNVBAM
P/E now vs peer median 27.9xmedian 32.9x 31.6xmedian 32.9x 27.0xmedian 32.9x
P/S now vs peer median 3.9xmedian 4.9x 19.9xmedian 4.9x 13.2xmedian 4.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 12.6xmedian 11.8x 20.9xmedian 11.8x 19.9xmedian 11.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 35.7xmedian 13.3x 26.0xmedian 13.3x 32.7xmedian 13.3x
P/B now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 1.9x 5.6xmedian 1.9x 8.2xmedian 1.9x
PEG now vs peer median 0.94median 0.93 1.06median 0.93 —median 0.93

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsKKRFNVBAM
Revenue $21.31B $2.32B $5.74B
Gross profit – $1.79B –
Operating income – $1.82B –
Net income $5.64B $1.48B $3.07B
Free cash flow $2.34B $1.77B $2.31B
EPS (diluted) $3.16 $7.54 $1.74
Cash & equivalents $21.08B $1.01B $1.50B
Total debt $53.48B – $3.47B
Shares (diluted) 945.58M 193.00M 1.61B
Enterprise value $5.80B $41.96B $72.29B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricKKRFNVBAM
P/E 27.9x 31.6x 27.0x
P/FCF 35.7x 26.0x 32.7x
P/Operating cash flow 33.6x 25.9x 32.4x
P/S 3.9x 19.9x 13.2x
P/B 1.1x 5.6x 8.2x
P/Tangible book 1.2x 5.6x 8.4x
EV/EBITDA 12.6x 20.9x 19.9x
EV/EBIT 12.3x 24.8x 20.1x
EV/Revenue 5.4x 19.4x 13.5x
EV/FCF 49.5x 25.4x 33.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 46.6x 25.3x 33.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.94 1.06 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricKKRFNVBAM
Revenue growth (1Y) 31.1% 73.6% 31.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 24.2% 23.5% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 88.6% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 32.0% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 89.7% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 34.4% –
Net income growth (1Y) 16.1% 88.3% 32.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 48.3% 30.6% –
EPS growth (1Y) 50.9% 87.7% 16.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 29.7% 29.9% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -47.6% 53.7% 73.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 33.3% 20.0% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -48.8% 83.9% 72.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 32.8% 19.8% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricKKRFNVBAM
Gross margin – 77.3% –
EBITDA margin 43.3% 93.0% 68.1%
Operating margin – 78.5% –
Pretax margin 31.1% 85.0% 64.7%
Net margin 14.0% 62.8% 48.9%
FCF margin 11.0% 76.4% 40.3%
Operating cash flow margin 11.7% 76.7% 40.7%
Return on equity 7.1% 18.1% 34.5%
Return on assets 1.3% 16.7% 16.1%
Return on invested capital 6.0% – 26.8%
Return on capital employed – 20.9% –
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.3x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.4x 1.2x 0.8x
Stock comp / revenue 3.6% 0.2% 2.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricKKRFNVBAM
Debt / assets 12.9% – 17.3%
Debt / equity 0.7x – 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.5x – 0.5x
Debt / FCF 22.9x – 1.5x
Liabilities / assets 81.3% 7.6% 54.2%
Equity / assets 18.7% 92.4% 45.8%
Interest coverage 3.4x 1,070x 27.0x
Current ratio – 9.4x –
Quick ratio – 8.5x –
Cash ratio – 6.9x –
Altman Z-score – 41.94 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricKKRFNVBAM
Dividend yield 0.8% 0.7% 4.1%
Net buyback yield 0.3% 0.0% 1.2%
Shareholder yield 1.1% 0.7% 5.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) 11.9% 18.0% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 28.6% 15.1% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 6.1% 12.4% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 7.3% 11.0% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusKKRFNVBAM
Forward P/E 10.9xFY2026 30.5xFY2026 27.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $8.52FY2026 $7.83FY2026 $1.74FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +74.9%FY2026 +40.3%FY2026 +6.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -18.9% +8.8% +30.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $11.55BFY2026 $2.66BFY2026 $6.57BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +50.8%FY2026 +46.4%FY2026 +20.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1.9% +1.3% +5.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersKKRFNVBAM
Held by institutions 60.4% 71.6% 93.3%
Institutions holding 1,266 661 619
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.8% +0.4% +0.6%
Institutions buying 634 335 292
Institutions selling 457 207 204
Buyers to sellers 1.39 1.62 1.43

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

KKRFNVBAM
KKR 1.00 0.13 0.77
FNV 0.13 1.00 0.25
BAM 0.77 0.25 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, KKR, FNV and BAM?

Kkr (KKR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Kkr (KKR) $85.66B, Franco Nevada (FNV) $44.59B, Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) $77.48B.

Which stock is cheaper, KKR, FNV and BAM?

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Kkr (KKR) 28.6x, Franco Nevada (FNV) 30.6x, Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) 27.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Kkr (KKR) is cheapest (Kkr (KKR) 10.9x, Franco Nevada (FNV) 30.5x, Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) 27.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Franco Nevada (FNV) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Kkr (KKR) +31.1%, Franco Nevada (FNV) +73.6%, Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) +31.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Franco Nevada (FNV) has the highest net margin (Kkr (KKR) 14.0%, Franco Nevada (FNV) 62.8%, Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) 48.9%). On return on invested capital, Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) leads (Kkr (KKR) 6.0%, Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) 26.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Franco Nevada (FNV) returned the most: Kkr (KKR) -22.9%, Franco Nevada (FNV) +27.7%, Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) -14.1%. Over five years, Franco Nevada (FNV) compounded fastest (Kkr (KKR) +3.2%/yr, Franco Nevada (FNV) +10.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Kkr (KKR) has the highest dividend yield: Kkr (KKR) 0.01%, Franco Nevada (FNV) 0.01%, Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) 0.00%. Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) has been the steadiest (Kkr (KKR) 38.1%, Franco Nevada (FNV) 38.9%, Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) 30.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, KKR, FNV and BAM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Franco Nevada (FNV) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.