KIM vs MAC vs SKT Stock Comparison

Kimco Realty, Macerich and Tanger Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (SPG) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
KIM Kimco Realty Corp
$25.08 +12.8% 1M +21.4% 1Y
Market cap
$16.67B
P/E
23.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.20B
Div. yield
4.23%
Retail REITs Real Estate
6 wins
MAC Macerich Co
$24.83 +7.7% 1M +44.8% 1Y
Market cap
$7.05B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.01B
Div. yield
2.74%
Retail REITs Real Estate
2 wins
SKT Tanger Inc.
$37.74 +7.6% 1M +15.9% 1Y
Market cap
$4.34B
P/E
17.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$612.31M
Div. yield
3.24%
Retail REITs Real Estate
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Kimco Realty leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Kimco Realty 6, Tanger 4, Macerich 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionKIMMACSKTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $16.67B $7.05B $4.34B KIM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 23.2x -40.1x 17.5x SKT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 31.0x — 34.3x KIM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +3.5% +1.3% +11.4% SKT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 32.7% -16.8% 40.3% SKT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 4.6% -6.9% — KIM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 5.2x -31.9x 3.1x MAC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 4.23% 2.74% 3.24% KIM
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +21.4% +44.8% +15.9% MAC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +0.9%/yr +2.7%/yr +12.1%/yr SKT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 18.3% 29.3% 21.2% KIM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 69/100 15/100 61/100 KIM

Percentile Scorecard

KIMMACSKT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisKIMMACSKT
Valuation 51 #72 of 145 1 #143 of 145 70 #44 of 145
Growth 77 #34 of 144 32 #99 of 144 80 #30 of 144
Profitability 78 #31 of 140 10 #126 of 140 99 #3 of 140
Financial Health 66 #51 of 146 21 #115 of 146 47 #78 of 146
Shareholder Returns 72 #38 of 132 8 #121 of 132 10 #119 of 132
Overall 69 15 61
  • KIM ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • MAC ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • SKT ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodKIMMACSKTSPY
1 month +12.8%+7.7%+7.6% -2.3%
3 months -1.3%-4.1%-7.4% -0.7%
6 months +7.2%+15.5%+4.0% +4.8%
Year to date +23.7%+34.5%+13.1% +10.3%
1 year +21.4%+44.8%+15.9% +10.3%
3 years +33.8%+121.3%+57.8% +73.0%
3 years, per year +10.2%+30.3%+16.4% +20.1%
5 years +4.5%+14.4%+76.9% +61.9%
5 years, per year +0.9%+2.7%+12.1% +10.1%
10 years -0.6%-63.0%+12.9% +258.6%
10 years, per year -0.1%-9.5%+1.2% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureKIMMACSKTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 18.3%29.3%21.2% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 16.5%31.3%19.1% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.010.610.21 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.171.530.75 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -37.8%-65.2%-36.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -5.0%-6.4%-10.4% -3.5%
52-week high $26.39$26.52$42.10 $779.14
52-week low $19.78$16.20$31.63 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleKIMMACSKT
P/E now vs peer median 23.2xmedian 26.3x -40.1xmedian 26.3x 17.5xmedian 26.3x
P/S now vs peer median 7.6xmedian 4.2x 7.0xmedian 4.2x 7.1xmedian 4.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 16.0xmedian 14.4x -80.6xmedian 14.4x 12.5xmedian 14.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 25.4xmedian 23.9x -37.9xmedian 23.9x 13.4xmedian 23.9x
P/B now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 1.3x 2.4xmedian 1.3x 6.2xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median 1.58median 1.98 2.63median 1.98 2.00median 1.98

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsKIMMACSKT
Revenue $2.20B $1.01B $612.31M
Gross profit – $595.32M –
Operating income $881.20M -$522.95M –
Net income $755.69M -$172.33M $246.96M
Free cash flow $657.16M -$186.19M $323.28M
EPS (diluted) $1.07 $-0.62 $2.13
Cash & equivalents $544.92M $227.03M $176.88M
Total debt $8.47B $4.85B $1.62B
Shares (diluted) 669.19M 273.72M 115.73M
Enterprise value $15.20B $6.15B $3.91B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricKIMMACSKT
P/E 23.2x -40.1x 17.5x
P/FCF 25.4x -37.9x 13.4x
P/Operating cash flow 13.5x 23.0x 7.3x
P/S 7.6x 7.0x 7.1x
P/B 1.6x 2.4x 6.2x
P/Tangible book 1.6x 2.4x 6.2x
EV/EBITDA 16.0x -80.6x 12.5x
EV/EBIT 27.9x -22.3x 19.5x
EV/Revenue 11.2x 11.6x 9.4x
EV/FCF 37.4x -62.7x 17.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 19.9x 38.0x 9.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.58 2.63 2.00

Growth

14 metrics
MetricKIMMACSKT
Revenue growth (1Y) 3.5% 1.3% 11.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 7.4% 5.1% 11.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 2.7% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 5.4% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 19.1% -5.4% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 12.7% -8.7% –
Net income growth (1Y) 24.4% 59.4% 21.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 16.6% -25.9% 12.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 28.3% 61.8% 19.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 14.7% -15.2% 8.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 12.3% -2.3% 10.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 6.0% -5.3% 10.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 39.6% 26.6% 63.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 19.7% -46.2% 10.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricKIMMACSKT
Gross margin – 59.2% –
EBITDA margin 70.0% -14.4% 75.4%
Operating margin 40.1% -52.0% –
Pretax margin 27.1% -52.0% 36.4%
Net margin 32.7% -16.8% 40.3%
FCF margin 29.9% -18.5% 52.8%
Operating cash flow margin 56.3% 30.5% 97.5%
Return on equity 7.3% -6.4% 18.9%
Return on assets 3.8% -2.1% 4.6%
Return on invested capital 4.6% -6.9% –
Return on capital employed 4.4% – –
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.1x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.6x -1.8x 2.4x
Stock comp / revenue 1.6% 2.2% 4.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricKIMMACSKT
Debt / assets 43.0% 56.9% 56.6%
Debt / equity 0.8x 1.7x 2.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 5.2x -31.9x 3.1x
Debt / FCF 12.9x -26.0x 5.0x
Liabilities / assets 47.7% 65.9% 75.5%
Equity / assets 52.3% 34.1% 24.5%
Interest coverage 2.6x – 4.1x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio 13.7x – –
Cash ratio 8.0x – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricKIMMACSKT
Dividend yield 4.2% 2.7% 3.2%
Net buyback yield 2.3% -8.3% -1.1%
Shareholder yield 6.6% -5.6% 2.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) 98.4% -111.9% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 113.1% -103.6% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 4.8% 8.8% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 0.4% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusKIMMACSKT
Forward P/E 31.0xFY2026 – 34.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.81FY2026 $-0.17FY2026 $1.10FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -1.2%FY2026 – +11.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +7.4% – +10.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.12BFY2026 $969.19MFY2026 $638.63MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +0.0%FY2026 -4.0%FY2026 +15.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +4.1% +13.7% -9.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersKIMMACSKT
Held by institutions 99.4% 100.0% 93.8%
Institutions holding 695 352 362
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.8% +19.5% +2.8%
Institutions buying 370 222 173
Institutions selling 202 79 122
Buyers to sellers 1.83 2.81 1.42

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

KIMMACSKT
KIM 1.00 0.55 0.69
MAC 0.55 1.00 0.66
SKT 0.69 0.66 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, KIM, MAC and SKT?

Kimco Realty (KIM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Kimco Realty (KIM) $16.67B, Macerich (MAC) $7.05B, Tanger (SKT) $4.34B.

Which stock is cheaper, KIM, MAC and SKT?

Tanger (SKT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Kimco Realty (KIM) 23.2x, Macerich (MAC) -40.1x, Tanger (SKT) 17.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Kimco Realty (KIM) is cheapest (Kimco Realty (KIM) 31.0x, Tanger (SKT) 34.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Tanger (SKT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Kimco Realty (KIM) +3.5%, Macerich (MAC) +1.3%, Tanger (SKT) +11.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Tanger (SKT) has the highest net margin (Kimco Realty (KIM) 32.7%, Macerich (MAC) -16.8%, Tanger (SKT) 40.3%). On return on invested capital, Kimco Realty (KIM) leads (Kimco Realty (KIM) 4.6%, Macerich (MAC) -6.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Macerich (MAC) returned the most: Kimco Realty (KIM) +21.4%, Macerich (MAC) +44.8%, Tanger (SKT) +15.9%. Over five years, Tanger (SKT) compounded fastest (Kimco Realty (KIM) +0.9%/yr, Macerich (MAC) +2.7%/yr, Tanger (SKT) +12.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Kimco Realty (KIM) has the highest dividend yield: Kimco Realty (KIM) 4.23%, Macerich (MAC) 2.74%, Tanger (SKT) 3.24%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Kimco Realty (KIM) has been the steadiest (Kimco Realty (KIM) 18.3%, Macerich (MAC) 29.3%, Tanger (SKT) 21.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, KIM, MAC and SKT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Kimco Realty (KIM) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.