KIM vs LVS vs MCRI Stock Comparison

Kimco Realty, Las Vegas Sands and Monarch Casino & Resort Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
KIM Kimco Realty Corp
$23.42 +4.1% 1M +7.5% 1Y
Market cap
$15.70B
P/E
27.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.19B
Div. yield
4.53%
Retail REITs Real Estate
3 wins
LVS Las Vegas Sands Corp
$36.23 -6.6% 1M -37.7% 1Y
Market cap
$22.72B
P/E
14.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$13.60B
Div. yield
3.17%
Casinos Consumer Discretionary
7 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Las Vegas Sands leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Las Vegas Sands 7, Kimco Realty 3, Monarch Casino & Resort 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionKIMLVSMCRILeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $15.70B $22.72B $2.01B LVS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 27.2x 14.4x 17.4x LVS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 28.9x 13.9x 15.7x LVS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +4.4% +10.9% +4.8% LVS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 26.4% 11.8% — KIM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 4.2% 14.9% — LVS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 5.5x 2.9x — LVS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 4.53% 3.17% 1.07% KIM
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +7.5% -37.7% +21.8% MCRI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +0.7%/yr -1.4%/yr +9.2%/yr MCRI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 18.0% 31.4% 25.3% KIM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 63/100 81/100 59/100 LVS

Percentile Scorecard

KIMLVSMCRI

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisKIMLVSMCRI
Valuation 46 #79 of 145 86 #7 of 44 33 #30 of 44
Growth 67 #48 of 142 81 #9 of 43 69 #14 of 43
Profitability 75 #34 of 135 95 #3 of 42 85 #7 of 42
Financial Health 62 #53 of 136 59 #20 of 47 85 #8 of 47
Shareholder Returns 63 #49 of 131 85 #5 of 28 22 #22 of 28
Overall 63 81 59
  • KIM ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • LVS ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • MCRI ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodKIMLVSMCRISPY
1 month +4.1%-6.6%-4.3% +0.9%
3 months -10.0%-25.4%-8.7% +5.9%
6 months -0.9%-32.6%-5.9% +8.5%
Year to date +15.5%-44.3%+17.3% +13.3%
1 year +7.5%-37.7%+21.8% +12.4%
3 years +38.8%-23.0%+89.5% +88.1%
3 years, per year +11.6%-8.3%+23.8% +23.5%
5 years +3.6%-6.6%+55.4% +68.2%
5 years, per year +0.7%-1.4%+9.2% +11.0%
10 years -11.0%-37.3%+378.9% +263.4%
10 years, per year -1.2%-4.6%+17.0% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureKIMLVSMCRISPY
Volatility, 1Y 18.0%31.4%25.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 17.0%35.5%22.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.040.570.32 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.42-1.200.86 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -37.8%-52.7%-41.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -11.3%-47.9%-16.1% -0.9%
52-week high $26.39$69.49$133.87 $779.14
52-week low $19.78$35.67$89.05 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleKIMLVSMCRI
P/E now vs peer median 27.2xmedian 25.8x 14.4xmedian 16.8x 17.4xmedian 16.8x
P/S now vs peer median 7.2xmedian 4.0x 1.7xmedian 1.9x 3.6xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 16.4xmedian 14.2x 8.0xmedian 10.2x —median 10.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 23.0xmedian 23.0x 9.4xmedian 11.2x 13.5xmedian 11.2x
P/B now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 1.3x -66.0xmedian 2.2x 3.5xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 2.31median 1.91 0.34median 0.44 1.39median 0.44

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsKIMLVSMCRI
Revenue $2.19B $13.60B $565.42M
Gross profit – $6.46B $143.95M
Operating income $788.44M $2.85B –
Net income $613.68M $1.81B $115.06M
Free cash flow $681.88M $2.41B –
R&D – $180.00M –
EPS (diluted) $0.86 $2.52 $6.30
Cash & equivalents $700.38M $2.86B $137.41M
Total debt $8.74B $15.44B –
Shares (diluted) 671.96M 640.00M 18.26M
Enterprise value $14.61B $9.54B $2.01B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricKIMLVSMCRI
P/E 27.2x 14.4x 17.4x
P/FCF 23.0x 9.4x 13.5x
P/Operating cash flow 13.3x 6.5x –
P/S 7.2x 1.7x 3.6x
P/B 1.5x -66.0x 3.5x
P/Tangible book 1.5x -66.0x 3.5x
EV/EBITDA 16.4x 8.0x –
EV/EBIT 30.1x 12.4x –
EV/Revenue 10.9x 2.6x 3.6x
EV/FCF 34.8x 14.7x –
EV/Operating cash flow 20.1x 10.1x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.31 0.34 1.39

Growth

14 metrics
MetricKIMLVSMCRI
Revenue growth (1Y) 4.4% 10.9% 4.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 7.5% 16.6% 4.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 5.5% 40.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 16.0% 8.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) 8.9% 5.4% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 8.4% 25.6% –
Net income growth (1Y) 1.3% 0.2% 39.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 14.2% 39.4% 9.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 2.9% 10.9% 42.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 11.8% 42.3% 12.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 10.7% 27.5% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 5.0% 18.1% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 44.6% 86.1% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 17.0% 23.5% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricKIMLVSMCRI
Gross margin – 47.5% –
EBITDA margin 66.4% 32.4% –
Operating margin 36.0% 20.9% –
Pretax margin 22.9% 16.3% –
Net margin 26.4% 11.8% –
FCF margin 31.2% 17.7% –
Operating cash flow margin 53.9% 25.6% –
Return on equity 5.9% 656.1% 20.1%
Return on assets 3.1% 9.2% 15.6%
Return on invested capital 4.2% 14.9% –
Return on capital employed 4.0% 18.9% –
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.7x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.9x 1.9x –
Stock comp / revenue 1.5% 0.5% 1.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricKIMLVSMCRI
Debt / assets 43.6% 79.5% –
Debt / equity 0.8x -44.9x –
Net debt / EBITDA 5.5x 2.9x –
Debt / FCF 12.8x 6.4x –
Liabilities / assets 48.0% 101.8% 22.6%
Equity / assets 52.0% -1.8% 77.4%
Interest coverage 2.3x 3.8x –
Current ratio – 0.8x 1.2x
Quick ratio 16.3x 0.8x –
Cash ratio 10.5x 0.6x –
Altman Z-score – 2.19 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricKIMLVSMCRI
Dividend yield 4.5% 3.2% 1.1%
Net buyback yield 1.1% 12.0% –
Shareholder yield 5.6% 15.2% 1.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) 118.3% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 106.5% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 3.4% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 7.2% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusKIMLVSMCRI
Forward P/E 28.9xFY2026 13.9xFY2026 15.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.81FY2026 $2.60FY2026 $7.15FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -1.2%FY2026 -13.6%FY2026 +31.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +7.4% +10.4% -3.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.12BFY2026 $14.18BFY2026 $556.26MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +0.0%FY2026 +8.9%FY2026 +2.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +4.1% +3.0% +10.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersKIMLVSMCRI
Held by institutions 99.4% 41.0% 64.8%
Institutions holding 693 710 256
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.8% +0.1% +3.7%
Institutions buying 369 331 143
Institutions selling 201 290 83
Buyers to sellers 1.84 1.14 1.72

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

KIMLVSMCRI
KIM 1.00 0.04 0.10
LVS 0.04 1.00 0.16
MCRI 0.10 0.16 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, KIM, LVS and MCRI?

Las Vegas Sands (LVS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Kimco Realty (KIM) $15.70B, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) $22.72B, Monarch Casino & Resort (MCRI) $2.01B.

Which stock is cheaper, KIM, LVS and MCRI?

Las Vegas Sands (LVS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Kimco Realty (KIM) 27.2x, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) 14.4x, Monarch Casino & Resort (MCRI) 17.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) is cheapest (Kimco Realty (KIM) 28.9x, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) 13.9x, Monarch Casino & Resort (MCRI) 15.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Las Vegas Sands (LVS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Kimco Realty (KIM) +4.4%, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) +10.9%, Monarch Casino & Resort (MCRI) +4.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Kimco Realty (KIM) has the highest net margin (Kimco Realty (KIM) 26.4%, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) 11.8%). On return on invested capital, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) leads (Kimco Realty (KIM) 4.2%, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) 14.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Monarch Casino & Resort (MCRI) returned the most: Kimco Realty (KIM) +7.5%, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) -37.7%, Monarch Casino & Resort (MCRI) +21.8%. Over five years, Monarch Casino & Resort (MCRI) compounded fastest (Kimco Realty (KIM) +0.7%/yr, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) -1.4%/yr, Monarch Casino & Resort (MCRI) +9.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Kimco Realty (KIM) has the highest dividend yield: Kimco Realty (KIM) 4.53%, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) 3.17%, Monarch Casino & Resort (MCRI) 1.07%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Kimco Realty (KIM) has been the steadiest (Kimco Realty (KIM) 18.0%, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) 31.4%, Monarch Casino & Resort (MCRI) 25.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, KIM, LVS and MCRI?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.