KHOBF vs ROP vs BRSL Stock Comparison

Kheoba, Roper Technologies and Brightstar Lottery Prices as of Oct 22, 2026 Peers: Industry group
KHOBF KHEOBA Ltd
$2.50 0.0% 1M 0.0% 1Y
Market cap
$20.23M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
ERP Software Technology
2 wins
ROP Roper Technologies Inc
$438.14 +19.6% 1M -8.7% 1Y
Market cap
$44.36B
P/E
17.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.28B
Div. yield
–
ERP Software Technology
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Roper Technologies leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Roper Technologies 5, Brightstar Lottery 4, Kheoba 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionKHOBFROPBRSLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $20.23M $44.36B $1.87B ROP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 17.7x 7.5x BRSL
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 19.2x 16.9x BRSL
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +10.9% +0.7% ROP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 30.2% 10.0% ROP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 6.6% 14.1% BRSL
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 3.4x 2.4x BRSL
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months 0.0% -8.7% -43.5% KHOBF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -2.1%/yr -20.3%/yr ROP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 0.0% 31.4% 32.7% KHOBF
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 56/100 41/100 ROP

Percentile Scorecard

KHOBFROPBRSL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisKHOBFROPBRSL
Valuation – 63 #38 of 101 61 #40 of 101
Growth – 52 #47 of 97 24 #74 of 97
Profitability – 83 #17 of 94 60 #38 of 94
Financial Health 82 #21 of 109 38 #68 of 109 29 #78 of 109
Shareholder Returns – 46 #35 of 64 33 #43 of 64
Overall – 56 41
  • KHOBF ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications
  • ROP ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications
  • BRSL ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodKHOBFROPBRSLSPY
1 month 0.0%+19.6%-7.6% -1.0%
3 months 0.0%+19.3%-8.8% +2.9%
6 months 0.0%+24.0%-26.6% +6.4%
Year to date 0.0%-1.6%-38.8% +11.4%
1 year 0.0%-8.7%-43.5% +13.1%
3 years —-9.2%-68.9% +79.4%
3 years, per year —-3.2%-32.2% +21.5%
5 years —-10.1%-67.7% +67.7%
5 years, per year —-2.1%-20.3% +10.9%
10 years —+154.1%-66.7% +255.2%
10 years, per year —+9.8%-10.4% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureKHOBFROPBRSLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 0.0%31.4%32.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y —33.8%34.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.00-0.070.84 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y —-0.28-1.33 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -37.5%-46.9%-72.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-8.7%-44.2% -2.5%
52-week high $2.50$479.96$17.00 $779.14
52-week low $2.50$315.53$9.22 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleKHOBFROPBRSL
P/E now vs peer median —median 29.9x 17.6xmedian 29.9x 7.5xmedian 29.9x
P/S now vs peer median —median 2.8x 5.2xmedian 2.8x 0.7xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 17.4x 16.7xmedian 17.4x 3.5xmedian 17.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 16.9x 16.5xmedian 16.9x -1.2xmedian 16.9x
P/B now vs peer median 122.0xmedian 3.1x 2.3xmedian 3.1x 0.9xmedian 3.1x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.86 -6.48median 0.86 -0.80median 0.86

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsKHOBFROPBRSL
Revenue – $8.28B $2.47B
Gross profit – $5.76B $1.32B
Operating income – $2.32B $1.07B
Net income – $2.50B $366.00M
Free cash flow – $2.62B -$1.47B
R&D – – $52.00M
EPS (diluted) – $24.89 $1.26
Cash & equivalents $318.16K $364.90M $558.00M
Total debt – $40.10B $19.09B
Shares (diluted) 8.09M 100.60M 197.00M
Enterprise value $19.91M $42.99B -$2.98B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricKHOBFROPBRSL
P/E – 17.6x 7.5x
P/FCF – 16.5x -1.2x
P/Operating cash flow – 16.2x -1.0x
P/S – 5.2x 0.7x
P/B 122.0x 2.3x 0.9x
P/Tangible book 125.8x 4.6x 0.9x
EV/EBITDA – 16.7x 3.5x
EV/EBIT – 23.4x 5.2x
EV/Revenue – 6.6x 2.3x
EV/FCF – 20.7x -3.8x
EV/Operating cash flow – 20.3x -3.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -6.48 -0.80

Growth

14 metrics
MetricKHOBFROPBRSL
Revenue growth (1Y) – 10.9% 0.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 12.7% 9.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 11.9% -4.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 12.6% 151.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 10.5% 88.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 12.1% -2.1%
Net income growth (1Y) – 62.7% 8.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -4.8% -4.5%
EPS growth (1Y) – 75.3% 33.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -2.7% -9.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 10.7% -265.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 34.0% -60.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 12.3% -207.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 35.4% -58.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricKHOBFROPBRSL
Gross margin – 69.5% 53.5%
EBITDA margin – 39.3% 65.3%
Operating margin – 28.0% 43.2%
Pretax margin – 35.9% 24.4%
Net margin – 30.2% 10.0%
FCF margin – 31.7% -59.6%
Operating cash flow margin – 32.2% -74.7%
Return on equity – 13.3% 17.7%
Return on assets – 7.2% 4.2%
Return on invested capital – 6.6% 14.1%
Return on capital employed – 7.4% 14.2%
Asset turnover – 0.2x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.1x -5.0x
Stock comp / revenue – 2.3% 0.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricKHOBFROPBRSL
Debt / assets – 32.2% 54.2%
Debt / equity – 0.6x 2.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – 3.4x 2.4x
Debt / FCF – 4.3x -3.0x
Liabilities / assets 49.8% 46.8% 74.9%
Equity / assets 50.2% 53.2% 25.1%
Interest coverage – 5.9x –
Current ratio 2.0x 0.6x 1.1x
Quick ratio 2.0x 0.4x 0.5x
Cash ratio 1.9x 0.1x 0.5x
Altman Z-score – 2.72 0.86

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricKHOBFROPBRSL
Dividend yield – 0.8% 9.6%
Net buyback yield – 6.2% -17.8%
Shareholder yield – 7.1% -8.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusKHOBFROPBRSL
Forward P/E – 19.2xFY2026 16.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $22.80FY2026 $0.56FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +14.0%FY2026 -38.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +12.3% +28.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $8.28BFY2026 $2.56BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +4.8%FY2026 +2.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +16.1% -2.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersKHOBFROPBRSL
Held by institutions – 100.0% 44.1%
Institutions holding – 1,075 200
Change in shares held, QoQ – +6.7% +3.8%
Institutions buying – 415 97
Institutions selling – 522 58
Buyers to sellers – 0.80 1.67

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

KHOBFROPBRSL
KHOBF – – –
ROP – 1.00 0.29
BRSL – 0.29 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, KHOBF, ROP and BRSL?

Roper Technologies (ROP) is the largest by market capitalisation: Kheoba (KHOBF) $20.23M, Roper Technologies (ROP) $44.36B, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) $1.87B.

Which stock is cheaper, KHOBF, ROP and BRSL?

Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Roper Technologies (ROP) 17.7x, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) 7.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) is cheapest (Roper Technologies (ROP) 19.2x, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) 16.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Roper Technologies (ROP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Roper Technologies (ROP) +10.9%, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) +0.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Roper Technologies (ROP) has the highest net margin (Roper Technologies (ROP) 30.2%, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) 10.0%). On return on invested capital, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) leads (Roper Technologies (ROP) 6.6%, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) 14.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Kheoba (KHOBF) returned the most: Kheoba (KHOBF) 0.0%, Roper Technologies (ROP) -8.7%, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) -43.5%. Over five years, Roper Technologies (ROP) compounded fastest (Roper Technologies (ROP) -2.1%/yr, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) -20.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Kheoba (KHOBF) has been the steadiest (Kheoba (KHOBF) 0.0%, Roper Technologies (ROP) 31.4%, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) 32.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, KHOBF, ROP and BRSL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Roper Technologies (ROP) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.