KEP vs NRG vs TAC Stock Comparison

Korea Electric Power, Nrg Energy and Transalta Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
KEP Korea Electric Power Corp
$10.47 -5.4% 1M -32.8% 1Y
Market cap
$13.36B
P/E
2.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$67.60B
Div. yield
–
Regulated Electric Utilities Utilities
5 wins
NRG Nrg Energy, Inc.
$96.99 0.0% 1M -43.9% 1Y
Market cap
$20.50B
P/E
26.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$33.13B
Div. yield
0.02%
Independent Power Producers Utilities
5 wins
TAC Transalta Corp
$13.08 +10.7% 1M -23.7% 1Y
Market cap
$3.92B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.64B
Div. yield
0.01%
Independent Power Producers Utilities
2 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Nrg Energy leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Nrg Energy 5, Korea Electric Power 5, Transalta 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionKEPNRGTACLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $13.36B $20.50B $3.92B NRG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 2.2x 26.2x -71.6x KEP
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 4.2x 11.4x 54.5x KEP
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -1.4% +12.8% -8.8% NRG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 8.8% 2.4% -3.3% KEP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 5.2% 5.8% 0.0% NRG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.5x 6.2x 4.8x KEP
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.02% 0.01% NRG
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -32.8% -43.9% -23.7% TAC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +1.8%/yr +19.5%/yr +3.1%/yr NRG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 47.6% 50.0% 40.9% TAC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 67/100 65/100 44/100 KEP

Percentile Scorecard

KEPNRGTAC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisKEPNRGTAC
Valuation 100 #1 of 67 70 #8 of 24 65 #9 of 24
Growth 88 #9 of 65 77 #6 of 23 27 #17 of 23
Profitability 39 #38 of 62 73 #7 of 23 55 #11 of 23
Financial Health 12 #55 of 62 17 #20 of 24 30 #17 of 24
Shareholder Returns 96 #4 of 67 89 #3 of 19 44 #11 of 19
Overall 67 65 44
  • KEP ranked among 67 companies in Regulated Utilities
  • NRG ranked among 24 companies in Power Generation
  • TAC ranked among 24 companies in Power Generation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodKEPNRGTACSPY
1 month -5.4%0.0%+10.7% +0.9%
3 months -7.8%-21.9%+5.1% +5.9%
6 months -28.8%-34.9%+8.9% +8.5%
Year to date -36.5%-39.1%+3.5% +13.3%
1 year -32.8%-43.9%-23.7% +12.4%
3 years +74.8%+132.8%+78.0% +88.1%
3 years, per year +20.5%+32.6%+21.2% +23.5%
5 years +9.2%+143.1%+16.6% +68.2%
5 years, per year +1.8%+19.5%+3.1% +11.0%
10 years -52.0%+841.7%+191.3% +263.4%
10 years, per year -7.1%+25.1%+11.3% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureKEPNRGTACSPY
Volatility, 1Y 47.6%50.0%40.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 48.6%55.6%44.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.311.411.10 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.69-0.88-0.58 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -55.0%-49.8%-48.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -55.0%-47.3%-26.2% -0.9%
52-week high $23.26$184.03$17.73 $779.14
52-week low $10.47$92.32$11.53 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleKEPNRGTAC
P/E now vs peer median 2.3xmedian 20.8x 26.2xmedian 24.9x -71.0xmedian 24.9x
P/S now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 2.9x 0.6xmedian 2.7x 2.4xmedian 2.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 5.2xmedian 13.1x 11.6xmedian 11.6x 11.7xmedian 11.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 6.6xmedian 35.3x 58.6xmedian 13.8x 13.8xmedian 13.8x
P/B now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 1.7x 4.2xmedian 2.1x 3.0xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median 0.07median 2.18 0.77median 0.61 2.24median 0.61

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsKEPNRGTAC
Revenue $67.60B $33.13B $1.64B
Gross profit $10.41B $6.23B $1.05B
Operating income $8.79B $2.02B $201.41M
Net income $5.57B $849.00M -$17.93M
Free cash flow $2.03B $348.00M $281.42M
EPS (diluted) $4.63 $3.69 $-0.18
Cash & equivalents $1.70B $162.00M $212.54M
Total debt $357.84B $23.44B $2.98B
Shares (diluted) 1.28B 212.00M 297.00M
Enterprise value -$16.78B $14.72B $2.82B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricKEPNRGTAC
P/E 2.3x 26.2x -71.0x
P/FCF 6.6x 58.6x 13.8x
P/Operating cash flow 1.1x 13.1x 8.0x
P/S 0.2x 0.6x 2.4x
P/B 0.4x 4.2x 3.0x
P/Tangible book 0.4x 7.5x 3.4x
EV/EBITDA 5.2x 11.6x 11.7x
EV/EBIT 10.8x 21.7x 32.5x
EV/Revenue 1.4x 1.3x 4.0x
EV/FCF 47.0x 125.5x 23.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 7.6x 28.1x 13.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.07 0.77 2.24

Growth

14 metrics
MetricKEPNRGTAC
Revenue growth (1Y) -1.4% 12.8% -8.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 13.4% 2.9% -14.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 4.0% 22.9% -4.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 36.9% 348.5% -12.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) 5.2% 57.9% 44.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 34.5% 43.0% -29.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 21.1% 62.6% 81.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 33.2% 34.1% -27.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 55.7% 58.9% 60.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 33.6% 34.1% -31.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -7.8% -32.1% 9.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 42.7% 33.9% -14.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -55.3% -75.0% 38.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 27.9% 27.6% -2.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricKEPNRGTAC
Gross margin 15.4% 18.8% 63.9%
EBITDA margin 26.9% 11.4% 34.0%
Operating margin 13.0% 6.1% 12.3%
Pretax margin 11.1% 3.2% 0.4%
Net margin 8.8% 2.4% -3.3%
FCF margin 3.0% 1.1% 17.2%
Operating cash flow margin 18.6% 4.7% 29.4%
Return on equity 16.5% 17.5% -1.5%
Return on assets 3.3% 2.1% -0.3%
Return on invested capital 5.2% 5.8% 0.0%
Return on capital employed 7.2% 6.7% –
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.8x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.3x 1.8x -26.9x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.4% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricKEPNRGTAC
Debt / assets 50.8% 58.7% 47.9%
Debt / equity 2.6x 4.8x 2.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.5x 6.2x 4.8x
Debt / FCF 42.7x 67.3x 10.6x
Liabilities / assets 80.3% 87.8% 79.1%
Equity / assets 19.7% 12.2% 20.9%
Interest coverage 3.1x 2.0x 0.8x
Current ratio 0.4x 1.0x –
Quick ratio 0.3x 0.5x –
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.0x –
Altman Z-score 0.60 1.42 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricKEPNRGTAC
Dividend yield 5.0% 1.9% 2.1%
Net buyback yield – 8.0% -5.9%
Shareholder yield 5.0% 9.9% -3.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 51.7% -193.0%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 126.1% 12.3%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 7.6% -5.0%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 9.1% 3.6%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusKEPNRGTAC
Forward P/E 4.2xFY2026 11.4xFY2026 54.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.49FY2026 $8.49FY2026 $0.24FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -44.2%FY2026 +5.2%FY2026 +71.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +22.9% +28.7% +54.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $74.80BFY2026 $36.07BFY2026 $1.40BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +14.4%FY2026 +17.5%FY2026 -20.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -9.9% -0.9% +23.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersKEPNRGTAC
Held by institutions 2.6% 93.7% –
Institutions holding 168 1,023 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +26.1% +0.7% –
Institutions buying 117 508 –
Institutions selling 33 385 –
Buyers to sellers 3.55 1.32 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

KEPNRGTAC
KEP 1.00 0.29 0.16
NRG 0.29 1.00 0.40
TAC 0.16 0.40 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, KEP, NRG and TAC?

Nrg Energy (NRG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Korea Electric Power (KEP) $13.36B, Nrg Energy (NRG) $20.50B, Transalta (TAC) $3.92B.

Which stock is cheaper, KEP, NRG and TAC?

Korea Electric Power (KEP) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Korea Electric Power (KEP) 2.2x, Nrg Energy (NRG) 26.2x, Transalta (TAC) -71.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Korea Electric Power (KEP) is cheapest (Korea Electric Power (KEP) 4.2x, Nrg Energy (NRG) 11.4x, Transalta (TAC) 54.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Nrg Energy (NRG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Korea Electric Power (KEP) -1.4%, Nrg Energy (NRG) +12.8%, Transalta (TAC) -8.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Korea Electric Power (KEP) has the highest net margin (Korea Electric Power (KEP) 8.8%, Nrg Energy (NRG) 2.4%, Transalta (TAC) -3.3%). On return on invested capital, Nrg Energy (NRG) leads (Korea Electric Power (KEP) 5.2%, Nrg Energy (NRG) 5.8%, Transalta (TAC) 0.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Transalta (TAC) returned the most: Korea Electric Power (KEP) -32.8%, Nrg Energy (NRG) -43.9%, Transalta (TAC) -23.7%. Over five years, Nrg Energy (NRG) compounded fastest (Korea Electric Power (KEP) +1.8%/yr, Nrg Energy (NRG) +19.5%/yr, Transalta (TAC) +3.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Nrg Energy (NRG) has the highest dividend yield: Korea Electric Power (KEP) 0.00%, Nrg Energy (NRG) 0.02%, Transalta (TAC) 0.01%. Korea Electric Power (KEP) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Transalta (TAC) has been the steadiest (Korea Electric Power (KEP) 47.6%, Nrg Energy (NRG) 50.0%, Transalta (TAC) 40.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, KEP, NRG and TAC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Nrg Energy (NRG) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.