KDP vs TTC vs CELH Stock Comparison

Keurig Dr Pepper, Toro and Celsius Holdings Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
KDP Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.
$34.68 +9.2% 1M +25.9% 1Y
Market cap
$47.59B
P/E
33.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$20.09B
Div. yield
–
Non-Alcoholic Beverages Consumer Staples
2 wins
TTC Toro Co
$105.41 +9.2% 1M +41.0% 1Y
Market cap
$10.03B
P/E
27.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.75B
Div. yield
0.01%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
6 wins
CELH Celsius Holdings, Inc.
$28.47 -2.4% 1M -54.0% 1Y
Market cap
$7.18B
P/E
119.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.05B
Div. yield
–
Non-Alcoholic Beverages Consumer Staples
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Toro leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Toro 6, Celsius Holdings 3, Keurig Dr Pepper 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionKDPTTCCELHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $47.59B $10.03B $7.18B KDP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 33.4x 27.6x 119.7x TTC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 14.6x 22.3x 20.8x KDP
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +27.5% +5.2% +82.9% CELH
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 7.1% 7.6% 2.0% TTC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 4.3% 16.4% 7.7% TTC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 6.7x 1.2x 0.2x CELH
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +25.9% +41.0% -54.0% TTC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +0.0%/yr +1.2%/yr -2.0%/yr TTC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 27.5% 25.7% 64.0% TTC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 40/100 57/100 64/100 CELH

Percentile Scorecard

KDPTTCCELH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisKDPTTCCELH
Valuation 49 #20 of 38 52 #98 of 203 54 #18 of 38
Growth 50 #17 of 33 55 #86 of 188 88 #5 of 33
Profitability 65 #12 of 32 91 #18 of 187 61 #13 of 32
Financial Health 16 #32 of 38 37 #140 of 222 65 #14 of 38
Shareholder Returns 22 #19 of 24 53 #73 of 153 52 #12 of 24
Overall 40 57 64
  • KDP ranked among 41 companies in Beverages
  • TTC ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • CELH ranked among 41 companies in Beverages

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodKDPTTCCELHSPY
1 month +9.2%+9.2%-2.4% -1.0%
3 months +16.8%+12.4%+5.0% +2.9%
6 months +18.7%+10.7%-17.7% +6.4%
Year to date +23.8%+33.9%-37.8% +11.4%
1 year +25.9%+41.0%-54.0% +13.1%
3 years +19.1%+29.6%-50.0% +79.4%
3 years, per year +6.0%+9.0%-20.7% +21.5%
5 years +0.1%+6.2%-9.4% +67.7%
5 years, per year +0.0%+1.2%-2.0% +10.9%
10 years -60.5%+125.9%+3,967.1% +255.2%
10 years, per year -8.9%+8.5%+44.9% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureKDPTTCCELHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 27.5%25.7%64.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 25.9%23.7%70.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.060.391.06 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.941.60-0.84 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -36.9%-45.3%-77.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -1.4%0.0%-55.1% -2.5%
52-week high $35.19$105.41$63.35 $779.14
52-week low $25.31$67.99$23.77 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleKDPTTCCELH
P/E now vs peer median 33.1xmedian 27.0x 27.6xmedian 25.9x 121.0xmedian 27.0x
P/S now vs peer median 2.3xmedian 1.6x 2.1xmedian 1.9x 2.4xmedian 1.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 17.8xmedian 14.4x 16.9xmedian 13.7x 30.1xmedian 14.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 24.0xmedian 18.3x 14.0xmedian 21.1x 15.6xmedian 18.3x
P/B now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 2.8x 7.5xmedian 2.3x 6.0xmedian 2.8x
PEG now vs peer median -11.96median 2.03 16.38median 1.19 3.59median 2.03

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsKDPTTCCELH
Revenue $20.09B $4.75B $3.05B
Gross profit $9.92B $1.59B $1.49B
Operating income $3.26B $489.80M $160.31M
Net income $1.50B $363.30M $129.12M
Free cash flow $1.97B $711.50M $462.77M
EPS (diluted) $1.05 $3.80 $0.23
Cash & equivalents $1.52B $175.30M $631.23M
Total debt $29.98B $962.00M $667.85M
Shares (diluted) 1.36B 95.60M 256.93M
Enterprise value $43.64B $9.15B $4.79B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricKDPTTCCELH
P/E 33.1x 27.6x 121.0x
P/FCF 24.0x 14.0x 15.6x
P/Operating cash flow 18.7x 12.6x 14.2x
P/S 2.3x 2.1x 2.4x
P/B 1.6x 7.5x 6.0x
P/Tangible book -5.3x 11.1x -40.0x
EV/EBITDA 17.8x 16.9x 30.1x
EV/EBIT 23.2x 22.0x 45.2x
EV/Revenue 3.8x 2.3x 2.4x
EV/FCF 38.4x 15.1x 15.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 29.9x 13.6x 14.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -11.96 16.38 3.59

Growth

14 metrics
MetricKDPTTCCELH
Revenue growth (1Y) 27.5% 5.2% 82.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 11.3% 0.1% 47.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 14.6% 5.6% 76.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 8.9% -1.2% 51.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) 22.4% 14.9% -7.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 10.4% 0.2% 62.2%
Net income growth (1Y) -2.7% 9.1% -2.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -2.3% -1.2% 46.9%
EPS growth (1Y) -7.2% 13.0% -36.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -2.8% 1.7% 33.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 19.4% 34.0% 115.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 9.0% 38.5% 66.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 23.0% 44.6% 119.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 6.4% 79.1% 67.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricKDPTTCCELH
Gross margin 49.4% 33.4% 48.8%
EBITDA margin 21.2% 13.4% 7.9%
Operating margin 16.2% 10.3% 5.3%
Pretax margin 9.8% 9.7% 4.6%
Net margin 7.1% 7.6% 2.0%
FCF margin 9.8% 15.0% 15.2%
Operating cash flow margin 12.6% 16.6% 16.7%
Return on equity 5.1% 26.9% 10.5%
Return on assets 1.9% 10.0% 2.5%
Return on invested capital 4.3% 16.4% 7.7%
Return on capital employed 5.4% 19.1% 3.9%
Asset turnover 0.2x 1.3x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.7x 2.2x 3.9x
Stock comp / revenue 0.6% 0.5% 1.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricKDPTTCCELH
Debt / assets 34.2% 27.2% 12.9%
Debt / equity 1.0x 0.7x 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA 6.7x 1.2x 0.2x
Debt / FCF 15.2x 1.4x 1.4x
Liabilities / assets 66.6% 62.2% 76.8%
Equity / assets 33.4% 37.8% 23.2%
Interest coverage – 8.7x 3.0x
Current ratio 0.5x 1.6x 1.8x
Quick ratio 0.2x 0.6x 1.3x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.2x 0.6x
Altman Z-score 0.78 5.27 2.06

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricKDPTTCCELH
Dividend yield 2.7% 1.5% –
Net buyback yield -9.3% 3.2% 1.0%
Shareholder yield -6.7% 4.7% 1.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 41.3% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 21.1% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – -0.4% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 2.9% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusKDPTTCCELH
Forward P/E 14.6xFY2026 22.3xFY2026 20.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.37FY2026 $4.73FY2026 $1.37FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +15.6%FY2026 +12.6%FY2026 +2.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +12.2% +16.3% +21.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $25.29BFY2026 $4.56BFY2026 $3.31BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +52.3%FY2026 +1.1%FY2026 +31.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +13.6% +3.0% +0.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersKDPTTCCELH
Held by institutions 100.0% 92.3% 65.3%
Institutions holding 852 590 540
Change in shares held, QoQ +12.9% +1.1% +5.3%
Institutions buying 469 295 296
Institutions selling 284 194 179
Buyers to sellers 1.65 1.52 1.65

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

KDPTTCCELH
KDP 1.00 0.16 0.28
TTC 0.16 1.00 0.13
CELH 0.28 0.13 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, KDP, TTC and CELH?

Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) is the largest by market capitalisation: Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) $47.59B, Toro (TTC) $10.03B, Celsius Holdings (CELH) $7.18B.

Which stock is cheaper, KDP, TTC and CELH?

Toro (TTC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) 33.4x, Toro (TTC) 27.6x, Celsius Holdings (CELH) 119.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) is cheapest (Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) 14.6x, Toro (TTC) 22.3x, Celsius Holdings (CELH) 20.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Celsius Holdings (CELH) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) +27.5%, Toro (TTC) +5.2%, Celsius Holdings (CELH) +82.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Toro (TTC) has the highest net margin (Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) 7.1%, Toro (TTC) 7.6%, Celsius Holdings (CELH) 2.0%). On return on invested capital, Toro (TTC) leads (Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) 4.3%, Toro (TTC) 16.4%, Celsius Holdings (CELH) 7.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Toro (TTC) returned the most: Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) +25.9%, Toro (TTC) +41.0%, Celsius Holdings (CELH) -54.0%. Over five years, Toro (TTC) compounded fastest (Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) +0.0%/yr, Toro (TTC) +1.2%/yr, Celsius Holdings (CELH) -2.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) 0.00%, Toro (TTC) 0.01%, Celsius Holdings (CELH) 0.00%. Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) and Celsius Holdings (CELH) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Toro (TTC) has been the steadiest (Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) 27.5%, Toro (TTC) 25.7%, Celsius Holdings (CELH) 64.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, KDP, TTC and CELH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Toro (TTC) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.