KDOZF vs PDD vs CRTO Stock Comparison

Kidoz, PDD Holdings and Criteo Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
KDOZF Kidoz Inc.
$0.11 +10.0% 1M -50.0% 1Y
Market cap
$14.44M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$19.55M
Div. yield
–
Digital Advertising Technology
1 win
PDD PDD Holdings Inc.
$79.28 +2.3% 1M -42.6% 1Y
Market cap
$109.93B
P/E
8.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$64.89B
Div. yield
–
Digital Marketplaces Technology
6 wins
CRTO Criteo S.A.
$14.89 -3.6% 1M -32.8% 1Y
Market cap
$727.58M
P/E
9.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.79B
Div. yield
–
Digital Advertising Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

PDD Holdings leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (PDD Holdings 6, Criteo 2, Kidoz 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionKDOZFPDDCRTOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $14.44M $109.93B $727.58M PDD
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -17.9x 8.2x 9.3x PDD
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 7.4x 4.1x CRTO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +31.2% +13.8% -8.2% KDOZF
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -4.1% 20.7% 4.4% PDD
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 6.9% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -50.0% -42.6% -32.8% CRTO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -27.3%/yr -2.3%/yr -14.7%/yr PDD
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 94.9% 33.6% 57.8% PDD
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 31/100 78/100 67/100 PDD

Percentile Scorecard

KDOZFPDDCRTO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisKDOZFPDDCRTO
Valuation 32 #114 of 166 87 #22 of 166 87 #23 of 166
Growth 22 #120 of 153 60 #62 of 153 30 #107 of 153
Profitability 40 #92 of 153 87 #21 of 153 55 #69 of 153
Financial Health – 80 #37 of 179 65 #64 of 179
Shareholder Returns – – 96 #5 of 91
Overall 31 78 67
  • KDOZF ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • PDD ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • CRTO ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodKDOZFPDDCRTOSPY
1 month +10.0%+2.3%-3.6% +0.7%
3 months +10.0%-9.3%-32.1% +3.7%
6 months -52.2%-20.6%-21.4% +7.1%
Year to date -63.3%-30.1%-27.8% +12.8%
1 year -50.0%-42.6%-32.8% +11.9%
3 years -21.4%-24.0%-46.6% +85.2%
3 years, per year -7.7%-8.7%-18.9% +22.8%
5 years -79.6%-10.8%-54.9% +67.6%
5 years, per year -27.3%-2.3%-14.7% +10.9%
10 years -75.6%—-59.5% +262.0%
10 years, per year -13.1%—-8.7% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureKDOZFPDDCRTOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 94.9%33.6%57.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 169.5%35.5%65.9% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.850.850.41 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.53-1.27-0.57 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -97.6%-73.1%-71.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -64.5%-42.6%-36.0% -1.2%
52-week high $0.31$138.13$23.28 $779.14
52-week low $0.09$73.30$14.17 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleKDOZFPDDCRTO
P/E now vs peer median -17.9xmedian 16.7x 8.2xmedian 16.7x 9.5xmedian 16.7x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 1.4x 1.7xmedian 1.4x 0.4xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -24.9xmedian 12.7x —median 12.7x —median 12.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median -13.2xmedian 10.5x 7.0xmedian 10.5x -51.7xmedian 10.5x
P/B now vs peer median 2.3xmedian 1.7x 1.7xmedian 1.7x 0.6xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median -0.99median 0.39 0.27median 0.39 0.07median 0.39

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsKDOZFPDDCRTO
Revenue $19.55M $64.89B $1.79B
Gross profit $8.95M $36.55B $940.45M
Operating income -$711.49K $14.41B $104.03M
Net income -$804.75K $13.45B $83.26M
Free cash flow -$1.09M $16.02B -$13.98M
R&D $4.44M $2.64B $281.99M
EPS (diluted) $-0.01 $9.08 $1.55
Cash & equivalents $1.34M $19.00B $252.24M
Total debt – – $45.06M
Shares (diluted) 131.30M 1.48B 50.55M
Enterprise value $3.56M -$134.12B -$489.90M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricKDOZFPDDCRTO
P/E -17.9x 8.2x 9.5x
P/FCF -13.2x 7.0x -51.7x
P/Operating cash flow -13.5x 7.0x 5.6x
P/S 0.7x 1.7x 0.4x
P/B 2.3x 1.7x 0.6x
P/Tangible book 2.3x 1.7x 0.7x
EV/EBITDA -24.9x – –
EV/EBIT -18.4x 3.2x 4.3x
EV/Revenue 0.7x 0.7x 0.3x
EV/FCF -12.0x 2.8x -32.4x
EV/Operating cash flow -12.2x 2.8x 3.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.99 0.27 0.07

Growth

14 metrics
MetricKDOZFPDDCRTO
Revenue growth (1Y) 31.2% 13.8% -8.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 9.8% 40.4% -2.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 11.3% 11.6% -8.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 19.6% 29.3% 5.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) -249.8% 12.7% -43.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 23.8% 37.4% 50.4%
Net income growth (1Y) -331.9% -1.4% -41.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 18.2% 32.0% 103.6%
EPS growth (1Y) -331.9% -1.6% -37.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 18.2% 30.8% 128.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -162.9% 22.0% -55.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -73.7% 21.6% -14.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -164.6% 22.0% -107.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -69.0% 21.6% -28.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricKDOZFPDDCRTO
Gross margin 45.8% 56.3% 52.6%
EBITDA margin -2.7% – –
Operating margin -3.6% 22.2% 5.8%
Pretax margin -3.9% 28.4% 6.0%
Net margin -4.1% 20.7% 4.4%
FCF margin -5.6% 24.7% -0.8%
Operating cash flow margin -5.5% 24.7% 7.2%
Return on equity -10.0% 21.1% 7.1%
Return on assets -7.2% 14.1% 4.1%
Return on invested capital – – 6.9%
Return on capital employed – 22.6% 7.6%
Asset turnover 2.0x 0.7x 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x 1.2x 1.6x
Stock comp / revenue 1.3% – 3.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricKDOZFPDDCRTO
Debt / assets – – 0.5%
Debt / equity – – 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – -0.7x
Liabilities / assets 28.8% 32.5% 42.1%
Equity / assets 71.2% 67.5% 57.9%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio – 2.6x 1.3x
Quick ratio – 2.1x 1.1x
Cash ratio – 2.1x 0.4x
Altman Z-score – 4.59 2.11

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricKDOZFPDDCRTO
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – 22.7%
Shareholder yield – 0.0% 22.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusKDOZFPDDCRTO
Forward P/E – 7.4xFY2026 4.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.01FY2026 $10.78FY2026 $3.62FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +4.2%FY2026 -21.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +19.6% +7.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $22.28MFY2026 $72.21BFY2026 $986.69MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +21.7%FY2026 +17.0%FY2026 -15.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +9.4% +9.4% +3.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersKDOZFPDDCRTO
Held by institutions – 30.3% 83.4%
Institutions holding – 507 127
Change in shares held, QoQ – +4.8% +2.2%
Institutions buying – 213 63
Institutions selling – 234 39
Buyers to sellers – 0.91 1.62

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

KDOZFPDDCRTO
KDOZF 1.00 0.08 -0.10
PDD 0.08 1.00 0.04
CRTO -0.10 0.04 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, KDOZF, PDD and CRTO?

PDD Holdings (PDD) is the largest by market capitalisation: Kidoz (KDOZF) $14.44M, PDD Holdings (PDD) $109.93B, Criteo (CRTO) $727.58M.

Which stock is cheaper, KDOZF, PDD and CRTO?

PDD Holdings (PDD) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Kidoz (KDOZF) -17.9x, PDD Holdings (PDD) 8.2x, Criteo (CRTO) 9.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Criteo (CRTO) is cheapest (PDD Holdings (PDD) 7.4x, Criteo (CRTO) 4.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Kidoz (KDOZF) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Kidoz (KDOZF) +31.2%, PDD Holdings (PDD) +13.8%, Criteo (CRTO) -8.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

PDD Holdings (PDD) has the highest net margin (Kidoz (KDOZF) -4.1%, PDD Holdings (PDD) 20.7%, Criteo (CRTO) 4.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Criteo (CRTO) returned the most: Kidoz (KDOZF) -50.0%, PDD Holdings (PDD) -42.6%, Criteo (CRTO) -32.8%. Over five years, PDD Holdings (PDD) compounded fastest (Kidoz (KDOZF) -27.3%/yr, PDD Holdings (PDD) -2.3%/yr, Criteo (CRTO) -14.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, PDD Holdings (PDD) has been the steadiest (Kidoz (KDOZF) 94.9%, PDD Holdings (PDD) 33.6%, Criteo (CRTO) 57.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, KDOZF, PDD and CRTO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, PDD Holdings (PDD) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.