KDOZF vs MSFT vs OPRA Stock Comparison

Kidoz, Microsoft and Opera Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
KDOZF Kidoz Inc.
$0.11 +10.0% 1M -50.0% 1Y
Market cap
$14.44M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$19.55M
Div. yield
–
Digital Advertising Technology
1 win
MSFT Microsoft Corp
$530.14 +4.2% 1M -2.1% 1Y
Market cap
$3.94T
P/E
27.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$346.45B
Div. yield
0.69%
Cloud Platforms Technology
5 wins
OPRA Opera Ltd
$17.37 -1.1% 1M +15.9% 1Y
Market cap
$1.56B
P/E
12.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$682.99M
Div. yield
4.61%
Operating Systems Technology
6 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Opera leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Opera 6, Microsoft 5, Kidoz 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionKDOZFMSFTOPRALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $14.44M $3.94T $1.56B MSFT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -17.9x 27.6x 12.3x OPRA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 26.0x 15.2x OPRA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +31.2% +17.9% +23.1% KDOZF
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -4.1% 41.2% 18.5% MSFT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 26.5% 10.4% MSFT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -0.1x -1.0x OPRA
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.69% 4.61% OPRA
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -50.0% -2.1% +15.9% OPRA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -27.3%/yr +9.8%/yr +15.8%/yr OPRA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 94.9% 32.6% 48.4% MSFT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 31/100 80/100 75/100 MSFT

Percentile Scorecard

KDOZFMSFTOPRA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisKDOZFMSFTOPRA
Valuation 32 #114 of 166 60 #16 of 38 98 #3 of 124
Growth 22 #120 of 153 74 #10 of 36 62 #44 of 113
Profitability 40 #92 of 153 97 #2 of 34 86 #16 of 109
Financial Health – 83 #7 of 37 81 #25 of 127
Shareholder Returns – 84 #4 of 20 47 #34 of 63
Overall 31 80 75
  • KDOZF ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • MSFT ranked among 39 companies in Cloud Computing
  • OPRA ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodKDOZFMSFTOPRASPY
1 month +10.0%+4.2%-1.1% +0.7%
3 months +10.0%+17.5%-7.0% +3.7%
6 months -52.2%+30.0%-2.1% +7.1%
Year to date -63.3%+9.6%+22.7% +12.8%
1 year -50.0%-2.1%+15.9% +11.9%
3 years -21.4%+57.2%+43.7% +85.2%
3 years, per year -7.7%+16.3%+12.8% +22.8%
5 years -79.6%+59.9%+108.5% +67.6%
5 years, per year -27.3%+9.8%+15.8% +10.9%
10 years -75.6%+785.5%— +262.0%
10 years, per year -13.1%+24.4%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureKDOZFMSFTOPRASPY
Volatility, 1Y 94.9%32.6%48.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 169.5%30.7%43.8% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.850.991.62 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.53-0.060.33 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -97.6%-37.6%-62.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -64.5%-2.4%-15.4% -1.2%
52-week high $0.31$543.45$20.54 $779.14
52-week low $0.09$352.83$11.79 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleKDOZFMSFTOPRA
P/E now vs peer median -17.9xmedian 16.7x 27.6xmedian 27.6x 12.3xmedian 39.0x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 1.4x 11.4xmedian 4.6x 2.3xmedian 4.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -24.9xmedian 12.7x 19.0xmedian 25.6x 11.3xmedian 32.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median -13.2xmedian 10.5x 65.7xmedian 15.4x 11.0xmedian 27.4x
P/B now vs peer median 2.3xmedian 1.7x 8.4xmedian 4.1x 1.5xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median -0.99median 0.39 1.21median 0.80 -0.16median 1.23

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsKDOZFMSFTOPRA
Revenue $19.55M $346.45B $682.99M
Gross profit $8.95M $234.39B $333.54M
Operating income -$711.49K $163.19B $106.56M
Net income -$804.75K $142.63B $150.24M
Free cash flow -$1.09M $59.96B $140.98M
R&D $4.44M $36.46B –
EPS (diluted) $-0.01 $19.16 $1.39
Cash & equivalents $1.34M $20.28B $145.21M
Total debt – $35.48B $65.57M
Shares (diluted) 131.30M 7.45B 90.96M
Enterprise value $3.56M $3.87T $835.54M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricKDOZFMSFTOPRA
P/E -17.9x 27.6x 12.3x
P/FCF -13.2x 65.7x 11.0x
P/Operating cash flow -13.5x 20.1x 11.7x
P/S 0.7x 11.4x 2.3x
P/B 2.3x 8.4x 1.5x
P/Tangible book 2.3x 8.7x 1.7x
EV/EBITDA -24.9x 19.0x 11.3x
EV/EBIT -18.4x 23.9x 13.4x
EV/Revenue 0.7x 11.3x 2.1x
EV/FCF -12.0x 65.2x 10.1x
EV/Operating cash flow -12.2x 20.0x 10.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.99 1.21 -0.16

Growth

14 metrics
MetricKDOZFMSFTOPRA
Revenue growth (1Y) 31.2% 17.9% 23.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 9.8% 16.6% 23.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 11.3% 16.0% 14.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 19.6% 15.6% 65.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) -249.8% 20.0% 18.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 23.8% 20.2% -86.4%
Net income growth (1Y) -331.9% 36.0% 57.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 18.2% 22.8% 40.9%
EPS growth (1Y) -331.9% 36.3% 55.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 18.2% 22.8% -78.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -162.9% 33.2% 25.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -73.7% 27.3% 17.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -164.6% -23.1% 30.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -69.0% -1.8% 18.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricKDOZFMSFTOPRA
Gross margin 45.8% 67.7% 48.8%
EBITDA margin -2.7% 59.3% 18.6%
Operating margin -3.6% 47.1% 15.6%
Pretax margin -3.9% 51.3% 27.1%
Net margin -4.1% 41.2% 18.5%
FCF margin -5.6% 17.3% 20.6%
Operating cash flow margin -5.5% 56.5% 19.5%
Return on equity -10.0% 31.2% 20.8%
Return on assets -7.2% 18.6% 18.1%
Return on invested capital – 26.5% 10.4%
Return on capital employed – 26.5% 10.5%
Asset turnover 2.0x 0.5x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x 1.4x 0.9x
Stock comp / revenue 1.3% 3.6% 4.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricKDOZFMSFTOPRA
Debt / assets – 4.6% 1.6%
Debt / equity – 0.1x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – -0.1x -1.0x
Debt / FCF – 0.6x 0.1x
Liabilities / assets 28.8% 39.6% 12.8%
Equity / assets 71.2% 60.4% 87.2%
Interest coverage – 50.6x 216.1x
Current ratio – 1.2x 2.0x
Quick ratio – 0.8x 2.0x
Cash ratio – 0.4x 1.1x
Altman Z-score – 9.47 8.21

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricKDOZFMSFTOPRA
Dividend yield – 0.7% 4.6%
Net buyback yield – 0.5% -3.7%
Shareholder yield – 1.2% 0.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 19.0% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 45.1% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 9.5% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 10.1% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusKDOZFMSFTOPRA
Forward P/E – 26.0xFY2027 15.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.01FY2026 $20.39FY2027 $1.14FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +18.0%FY2027 -4.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +11.6% +32.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $22.28MFY2026 $402.39BFY2027 $770.49MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +21.7%FY2026 +21.3%FY2027 +25.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +9.4% +12.9% +15.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersKDOZFMSFTOPRA
Held by institutions – 73.9% 17.2%
Institutions holding – 6,231 144
Change in shares held, QoQ – +3.3% +13.5%
Institutions buying – 3,435 77
Institutions selling – 2,426 36
Buyers to sellers – 1.42 2.14

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

KDOZFMSFTOPRA
KDOZF 1.00 0.09 0.20
MSFT 0.09 1.00 0.29
OPRA 0.20 0.29 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, KDOZF, MSFT and OPRA?

Microsoft (MSFT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Kidoz (KDOZF) $14.44M, Microsoft (MSFT) $3.94T, Opera (OPRA) $1.56B.

Which stock is cheaper, KDOZF, MSFT and OPRA?

Opera (OPRA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Kidoz (KDOZF) -17.9x, Microsoft (MSFT) 27.6x, Opera (OPRA) 12.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Opera (OPRA) is cheapest (Microsoft (MSFT) 26.0x, Opera (OPRA) 15.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Kidoz (KDOZF) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Kidoz (KDOZF) +31.2%, Microsoft (MSFT) +17.9%, Opera (OPRA) +23.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Microsoft (MSFT) has the highest net margin (Kidoz (KDOZF) -4.1%, Microsoft (MSFT) 41.2%, Opera (OPRA) 18.5%). On return on invested capital, Microsoft (MSFT) leads (Microsoft (MSFT) 26.5%, Opera (OPRA) 10.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Opera (OPRA) returned the most: Kidoz (KDOZF) -50.0%, Microsoft (MSFT) -2.1%, Opera (OPRA) +15.9%. Over five years, Opera (OPRA) compounded fastest (Kidoz (KDOZF) -27.3%/yr, Microsoft (MSFT) +9.8%/yr, Opera (OPRA) +15.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Opera (OPRA) has the highest dividend yield: Microsoft (MSFT) 0.69%, Opera (OPRA) 4.61%. Kidoz (KDOZF) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Microsoft (MSFT) has been the steadiest (Kidoz (KDOZF) 94.9%, Microsoft (MSFT) 32.6%, Opera (OPRA) 48.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, KDOZF, MSFT and OPRA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Opera (OPRA) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.