KBSX vs UMAC vs YETI Stock Comparison

Fst, Unusual Machines and YETI Holdings Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
KBSX FST Corp.
$1.31 -23.4% 1M -13.8% 1Y
Market cap
$58.64M
P/E
719.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$53.22M
Div. yield
–
Sporting Goods Consumer Discretionary
UMAC Unusual Machines, Inc.
$17.32 -30.5% 1M +8.9% 1Y
Market cap
$865.25M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$25.88M
Div. yield
–
Sporting Goods Consumer Discretionary
1 win
YETI YETI Holdings, Inc.
$44.21 +3.9% 1M +27.8% 1Y
Market cap
$3.23B
P/E
15.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.00B
Div. yield
–
Sporting Goods Consumer Discretionary
8 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

YETI Holdings leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (YETI Holdings 8, Unusual Machines 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionKBSXUMACYETILeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $58.64M $865.25M $3.23B YETI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 719.6x -35.5x 15.0x YETI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 21.8x — 15.1x YETI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +18.6% +236.0% +9.8% UMAC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.2% -91.6% 11.0% YETI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.9% — 30.1% YETI
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -13.8% +8.9% +27.8% YETI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — — -14.8%/yr –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 81.4% 126.0% 39.7% YETI
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 43/100 47/100 70/100 YETI

Percentile Scorecard

KBSXUMACYETI

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisKBSXUMACYETI
Valuation 21 #27 of 34 9 #31 of 34 52 #17 of 34
Growth 94 #3 of 32 74 #9 of 32 81 #7 of 32
Profitability 42 #19 of 32 13 #28 of 32 100 #1 of 32
Financial Health 16 #28 of 33 91 #4 of 33 47 #18 of 33
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 43 47 70
  • KBSX ranked among 34 companies in Leisure Products
  • UMAC ranked among 34 companies in Leisure Products
  • YETI ranked among 34 companies in Leisure Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodKBSXUMACYETISPY
1 month -23.4%-30.5%+3.9% +0.7%
3 months +48.9%-15.3%-10.9% +3.7%
6 months +2.3%+18.7%+12.0% +7.1%
Year to date -6.4%+35.9%+0.1% +12.8%
1 year -13.8%+8.9%+27.8% +11.9%
3 years -88.0%—+7.5% +85.2%
3 years, per year -50.7%—+2.4% +22.8%
5 years ——-55.0% +67.6%
5 years, per year ——-14.8% +10.9%

Risk

MeasureKBSXUMACYETISPY
Volatility, 1Y 81.4%126.0%39.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 74.6%116.5%38.3% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.214.061.15 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.170.070.70 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -94.0%-75.6%-75.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -23.8%-48.9%-16.1% -1.2%
52-week high $1.72$33.87$52.68 $779.14
52-week low $0.84$7.76$32.50 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleKBSXUMACYETI
P/E now vs peer median 719.6xmedian 18.6x -35.5xmedian 18.6x 15.0xmedian 18.6x
P/S now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 1.1x 33.4xmedian 1.1x 1.6xmedian 1.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 10.1x -19.9xmedian 10.1x —median 10.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median -62.7xmedian 11.2x —median 11.2x —median 11.2x
P/B now vs peer median 3.6xmedian 1.5x 2.2xmedian 1.5x 5.3xmedian 1.5x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.04 —median 1.04 0.27median 1.04

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsKBSXUMACYETI
Revenue $53.22M $25.88M $2.00B
Gross profit $25.31M $9.21M $1.19B
Operating income $1.55M -$29.72M $285.40M
Net income $501.64K -$23.71M $220.10M
Free cash flow -$935.29K – –
R&D $1.68M $625.44K –
EPS (diluted) $0.00 $-0.49 $2.90
Cash & equivalents $6.13M $229.60M $59.82M
Total debt $29.89M – $330.21M
Shares (diluted) 44.48M 48.61M 75.78M
Enterprise value $29.75M $401.74M $2.54B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricKBSXUMACYETI
P/E 719.6x -35.5x 15.0x
P/FCF -62.7x – –
P/Operating cash flow 66.5x – –
P/S 1.1x 33.4x 1.6x
P/B 3.6x 2.2x 5.3x
P/Tangible book 4.9x 2.2x 8.4x
EV/EBITDA – -19.9x –
EV/EBIT 53.3x -19.8x 11.4x
EV/Revenue 1.5x 22.7x 1.6x
EV/FCF -88.1x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 93.5x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – 0.27

Growth

14 metrics
MetricKBSXUMACYETI
Revenue growth (1Y) 18.6% 236.0% 9.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – 8.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 27.8% 310.3% 12.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 15.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) 137.2% -19.9% 21.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – 46.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 106.2% 40.0% 24.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – 49.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 101.2% 73.1% 36.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – 56.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 126.9% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 83.0% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricKBSXUMACYETI
Gross margin 47.5% 35.6% 59.6%
EBITDA margin – -114.1% –
Operating margin 2.9% -114.8% 14.3%
Pretax margin 3.4% -100.7% 14.5%
Net margin 0.2% -91.6% 11.0%
FCF margin -1.8% – –
Operating cash flow margin 1.7% – –
Return on equity 3.1% -9.3% 34.9%
Return on assets 0.8% -9.0% 17.4%
Return on invested capital 0.9% – 30.1%
Return on capital employed 5.0% -10.5% 33.2%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.1x 1.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.8x – –
Stock comp / revenue – – 2.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricKBSXUMACYETI
Debt / assets 47.2% – 7.7%
Debt / equity 1.8x – 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF -32.0x – –
Liabilities / assets 74.0% 2.4% 53.2%
Equity / assets 26.0% 97.6% 46.8%
Interest coverage 3.3x -37,148x –
Current ratio 0.9x 53.8x 1.8x
Quick ratio 0.4x 41.6x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.2x 40.2x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 1.68 55.65 6.27

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricKBSXUMACYETI
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusKBSXUMACYETI
Forward P/E 21.8xFY2026 – 15.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.06FY2026 $-0.29FY2026 $2.92FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – +17.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +83.3% – +18.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $59.34MFY2026 $53.31MFY2026 $1.88BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +23.7%FY2026 +376.0%FY2026 +0.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +11.1% +116.9% +17.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersKBSXUMACYETI
Held by institutions – 59.7% 93.7%
Institutions holding – 183 457
Change in shares held, QoQ – +23.8% -3.3%
Institutions buying – 134 222
Institutions selling – 40 167
Buyers to sellers – 3.35 1.33

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

KBSXUMACYETI
KBSX 1.00 0.17 0.05
UMAC 0.17 1.00 0.05
YETI 0.05 0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, KBSX, UMAC and YETI?

YETI Holdings (YETI) is the largest by market capitalisation: Fst (KBSX) $58.64M, Unusual Machines (UMAC) $865.25M, YETI Holdings (YETI) $3.23B.

Which stock is cheaper, KBSX, UMAC and YETI?

YETI Holdings (YETI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Fst (KBSX) 719.6x, Unusual Machines (UMAC) -35.5x, YETI Holdings (YETI) 15.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, YETI Holdings (YETI) is cheapest (Fst (KBSX) 21.8x, YETI Holdings (YETI) 15.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Unusual Machines (UMAC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Fst (KBSX) +18.6%, Unusual Machines (UMAC) +236.0%, YETI Holdings (YETI) +9.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

YETI Holdings (YETI) has the highest net margin (Fst (KBSX) 0.2%, Unusual Machines (UMAC) -91.6%, YETI Holdings (YETI) 11.0%). On return on invested capital, YETI Holdings (YETI) leads (Fst (KBSX) 0.9%, YETI Holdings (YETI) 30.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year YETI Holdings (YETI) returned the most: Fst (KBSX) -13.8%, Unusual Machines (UMAC) +8.9%, YETI Holdings (YETI) +27.8%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, YETI Holdings (YETI) has been the steadiest (Fst (KBSX) 81.4%, Unusual Machines (UMAC) 126.0%, YETI Holdings (YETI) 39.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, KBSX, UMAC and YETI?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, YETI Holdings (YETI) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.