KBSX vs UMAC vs GOLF Stock Comparison

Fst, Unusual Machines and Acushnet Holdings Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
KBSX FST Corp.
$1.35 -19.6% 1M -14.6% 1Y
Market cap
$58.71M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$52.97M
Div. yield
–
Sporting Goods Consumer Discretionary
UMAC Unusual Machines, Inc.
$17.87 -25.8% 1M +18.1% 1Y
Market cap
$843.89M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$25.88M
Div. yield
–
Sporting Goods Consumer Discretionary
2 wins
GOLF Acushnet Holdings Corp.
$82.51 -0.6% 1M +0.6% 1Y
Market cap
$4.97B
P/E
22.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.71B
Div. yield
0.01%
Sporting Goods Consumer Discretionary
6 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Acushnet Holdings leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Acushnet Holdings 6, Unusual Machines 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionKBSXUMACGOLFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $58.71M $843.89M $4.97B GOLF
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -66.5x -35.6x 22.6x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 22.5x — 21.1x GOLF
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +29.6% +236.0% +8.8% UMAC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -1.7% -91.6% 8.1% GOLF
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.0% — 14.4% GOLF
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 2.1x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.01% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -14.6% +18.1% +0.6% UMAC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — — +10.7%/yr –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 80.5% 126.9% 30.1% GOLF
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 45/100 47/100 53/100 GOLF

Percentile Scorecard

KBSXUMACGOLF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisKBSXUMACGOLF
Valuation 27 #25 of 34 9 #31 of 34 30 #24 of 34
Growth 94 #3 of 32 74 #9 of 32 52 #16 of 32
Profitability 39 #20 of 32 13 #28 of 32 90 #4 of 32
Financial Health 19 #27 of 33 91 #4 of 33 38 #21 of 33
Shareholder Returns – – 53 #9 of 18
Overall 45 47 53
  • KBSX ranked among 34 companies in Leisure Products
  • UMAC ranked among 34 companies in Leisure Products
  • GOLF ranked among 34 companies in Leisure Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodKBSXUMACGOLFSPY
1 month -19.6%-25.8%-0.6% -0.2%
3 months +48.4%-10.3%-20.0% +3.9%
6 months +5.5%+23.3%-15.2% +8.2%
Year to date -3.6%+40.3%+3.4% +12.9%
1 year -14.6%+18.1%+0.6% +12.3%
3 years -87.7%—+66.3% +87.4%
3 years, per year -50.3%—+18.5% +23.3%
5 years ——+65.8% +67.9%
5 years, per year ——+10.7% +10.9%

Risk

MeasureKBSXUMACGOLFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 80.5%126.9%30.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 73.2%117.5%30.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.244.050.58 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.180.140.02 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -94.0%-75.6%-34.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -21.5%-47.2%-30.4% -1.2%
52-week high $1.72$33.87$118.53 $779.14
52-week low $0.84$7.76$75.29 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleKBSXUMACGOLF
P/E now vs peer median -68.0xmedian 17.8x -36.6xmedian 17.8x 22.4xmedian 17.8x
P/S now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 1.1x 34.5xmedian 1.1x 1.8xmedian 1.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 9.4x -20.9xmedian 9.4x 13.4xmedian 9.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 38.0xmedian 10.2x —median 10.2x 26.2xmedian 10.2x
P/B now vs peer median 3.8xmedian 1.4x 2.3xmedian 1.4x 5.2xmedian 1.4x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.32 —median 0.32 4.82median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsKBSXUMACGOLF
Revenue $52.97M $25.88M $2.71B
Gross profit $23.99M $9.21M $1.33B
Operating income $569.16K -$29.72M $371.75M
Net income -$505.32K -$23.71M $220.35M
Free cash flow $1.59M – $183.74M
R&D $1.55M $625.44K $78.67M
EPS (diluted) $-0.02 $-0.49 $3.67
Cash & equivalents $8.22M $229.60M $67.94M
Total debt $119.39M – $960.07M
Shares (diluted) 44.48M 48.61M 59.93M
Enterprise value $27.98M $380.38M $4.71B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricKBSXUMACGOLF
P/E -68.0x -36.6x 22.4x
P/FCF 38.0x – 26.2x
P/Operating cash flow 48.7x – 17.8x
P/S 1.1x 34.5x 1.8x
P/B 3.8x 2.3x 5.2x
P/Tangible book 5.4x 2.3x 11.5x
EV/EBITDA – -20.9x 13.4x
EV/EBIT 145.2x -20.7x 15.4x
EV/Revenue 1.6x 23.8x 2.1x
EV/FCF 52.0x – 31.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 66.7x – 21.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – 4.82

Growth

14 metrics
MetricKBSXUMACGOLF
Revenue growth (1Y) 29.6% 236.0% 8.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – 4.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 31.9% 310.3% 10.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 5.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) 112.6% -19.9% 23.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – 5.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 94.5% 40.0% -4.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – -0.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 88.8% 73.1% -3.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – 4.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 130.3% – 54.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 23.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 123.0% – 89.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 35.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricKBSXUMACGOLF
Gross margin 45.3% 35.6% 49.1%
EBITDA margin – -114.1% 15.7%
Operating margin 1.1% -114.8% 13.7%
Pretax margin 1.4% -100.7% 10.9%
Net margin -1.7% -91.6% 8.1%
FCF margin 3.0% – 6.8%
Operating cash flow margin 2.3% – 10.0%
Return on equity -3.1% -9.3% 25.1%
Return on assets -0.8% -9.0% 8.5%
Return on invested capital 0.0% – 14.4%
Return on capital employed 1.8% -10.5% 17.8%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.1x 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -2.5x – 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue – – 1.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricKBSXUMACGOLF
Debt / assets 48.4% – 37.3%
Debt / equity 1.9x – 1.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 2.1x
Debt / FCF 19.1x – 5.2x
Liabilities / assets 74.6% 2.4% 64.1%
Equity / assets 25.4% 97.6% 35.9%
Interest coverage 1.3x -37,148x –
Current ratio 0.9x 53.8x 2.6x
Quick ratio 0.5x 41.6x 1.1x
Cash ratio 0.3x 40.2x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 1.66 57.40 3.80

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricKBSXUMACGOLF
Dividend yield – – 1.2%
Net buyback yield – – 2.3%
Shareholder yield – – 3.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 26.5%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 31.7%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 6.3%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 3.4%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusKBSXUMACGOLF
Forward P/E 22.5xFY2026 – 21.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.06FY2026 $-0.29FY2026 $3.91FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – +25.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +83.3% – +2.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $59.34MFY2026 $53.31MFY2026 $2.60BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +23.7%FY2026 +376.0%FY2026 +1.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +11.1% +116.9% +10.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersKBSXUMACGOLF
Held by institutions – 59.7% 53.9%
Institutions holding – 183 340
Change in shares held, QoQ – +23.8% -0.7%
Institutions buying – 134 150
Institutions selling – 40 130
Buyers to sellers – 3.35 1.15

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

KBSXUMACGOLF
KBSX 1.00 0.17 -0.03
UMAC 0.17 1.00 0.03
GOLF -0.03 0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, KBSX, UMAC and GOLF?

Acushnet Holdings (GOLF) is the largest by market capitalisation: Fst (KBSX) $58.71M, Unusual Machines (UMAC) $843.89M, Acushnet Holdings (GOLF) $4.97B.

Which company is growing faster?

Unusual Machines (UMAC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Fst (KBSX) +29.6%, Unusual Machines (UMAC) +236.0%, Acushnet Holdings (GOLF) +8.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Acushnet Holdings (GOLF) has the highest net margin (Fst (KBSX) -1.7%, Unusual Machines (UMAC) -91.6%, Acushnet Holdings (GOLF) 8.1%). On return on invested capital, Acushnet Holdings (GOLF) leads (Fst (KBSX) 0.0%, Acushnet Holdings (GOLF) 14.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Unusual Machines (UMAC) returned the most: Fst (KBSX) -14.6%, Unusual Machines (UMAC) +18.1%, Acushnet Holdings (GOLF) +0.6%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Fst (KBSX) 0.00%, Unusual Machines (UMAC) 0.00%, Acushnet Holdings (GOLF) 0.01%. Fst (KBSX) and Unusual Machines (UMAC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Acushnet Holdings (GOLF) has been the steadiest (Fst (KBSX) 80.5%, Unusual Machines (UMAC) 126.9%, Acushnet Holdings (GOLF) 30.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, KBSX, UMAC and GOLF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Acushnet Holdings (GOLF) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.