KBSX vs SWBI vs UMAC Stock Comparison

Fst, Smith & Wesson Brands and Unusual Machines Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
KBSX FST Corp.
$1.31 -23.4% 1M -13.8% 1Y
Market cap
$61.82M
P/E
763.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$53.22M
Div. yield
–
Sporting Goods Consumer Discretionary
1 win
UMAC Unusual Machines, Inc.
$17.32 -30.5% 1M +8.9% 1Y
Market cap
$742.78M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$25.88M
Div. yield
–
Sporting Goods Consumer Discretionary
2 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Smith & Wesson Brands leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Smith & Wesson Brands 6, Unusual Machines 2, Fst 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionKBSXSWBIUMACLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $61.82M $589.95M $742.78M UMAC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 763.6x 24.1x -31.3x SWBI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 21.8x 23.6x — KBSX
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +18.6% +17.0% +236.0% UMAC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.2% 4.4% -91.6% SWBI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.9% 6.6% — SWBI
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 0.3x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -13.8% +37.1% +8.9% SWBI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -8.7%/yr — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 81.4% 42.7% 126.0% SWBI
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 43/100 75/100 47/100 SWBI

Percentile Scorecard

KBSXSWBIUMAC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisKBSXSWBIUMAC
Valuation 21 #27 of 34 88 #5 of 34 9 #31 of 34
Growth 94 #3 of 32 84 #6 of 32 74 #9 of 32
Profitability 42 #19 of 32 74 #9 of 32 13 #28 of 32
Financial Health 16 #28 of 33 53 #16 of 33 91 #4 of 33
Shareholder Returns – 77 #5 of 18 –
Overall 43 75 47
  • KBSX ranked among 34 companies in Leisure Products
  • SWBI ranked among 34 companies in Leisure Products
  • UMAC ranked among 34 companies in Leisure Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodKBSXSWBIUMACSPY
1 month -23.4%-2.8%-30.5% +0.7%
3 months +48.9%-8.6%-15.3% +3.7%
6 months +2.3%-12.1%+18.7% +7.1%
Year to date -6.4%+38.4%+35.9% +12.8%
1 year -13.8%+37.1%+8.9% +11.9%
3 years -88.0%-3.9%— +85.2%
3 years, per year -50.7%-1.3%— +22.8%
5 years —-36.5%— +67.6%
5 years, per year —-8.7%— +10.9%
10 years —-30.9%— +262.0%
10 years, per year —-3.6%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureKBSXSWBIUMACSPY
Volatility, 1Y 81.4%42.7%126.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 74.6%31.1%116.5% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.210.574.06 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.170.870.07 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -94.0%-67.8%-75.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -23.8%-18.1%-48.9% -1.2%
52-week high $1.72$16.67$33.87 $779.14
52-week low $0.84$8.16$7.76 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleKBSXSWBIUMAC
P/E now vs peer median 719.6xmedian 18.6x 25.0xmedian 18.6x -35.5xmedian 18.6x
P/S now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 1.1x 1.1xmedian 1.1x 33.4xmedian 1.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 10.1x 9.5xmedian 10.1x -19.9xmedian 10.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median -62.7xmedian 11.2x 7.5xmedian 11.2x —median 11.2x
P/B now vs peer median 3.6xmedian 1.5x 1.6xmedian 1.5x 2.2xmedian 1.5x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.04 -2.09median 1.04 —median 1.04

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsKBSXSWBIUMAC
Revenue $53.22M $551.35M $25.88M
Gross profit $25.31M $151.30M $9.21M
Operating income $1.55M $36.39M -$29.72M
Net income $501.64K $24.48M -$23.71M
Free cash flow -$935.29K $82.07M –
R&D $1.68M $9.85M $625.44K
EPS (diluted) $0.00 $0.54 $-0.49
Cash & equivalents $6.13M $18.70M $229.60M
Total debt $29.89M $39.19M –
Shares (diluted) 44.48M 45.48M 48.61M
Enterprise value $32.93M $502.21M $279.27M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricKBSXSWBIUMAC
P/E 719.6x 25.0x -35.5x
P/FCF -62.7x 7.5x –
P/Operating cash flow 66.5x 5.4x –
P/S 1.1x 1.1x 33.4x
P/B 3.6x 1.6x 2.2x
P/Tangible book 4.9x 1.6x 2.2x
EV/EBITDA – 9.5x -19.9x
EV/EBIT 53.3x 17.4x -19.8x
EV/Revenue 1.5x 1.1x 22.7x
EV/FCF -88.1x 7.7x –
EV/Operating cash flow 93.5x 5.6x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -2.09 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricKBSXSWBIUMAC
Revenue growth (1Y) 18.6% 17.0% 236.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 2.7% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 27.8% 21.0% 310.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -0.5% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 137.2% 62.1% -19.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -9.3% –
Net income growth (1Y) 106.2% 106.3% 40.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -12.6% –
EPS growth (1Y) 101.2% 100.7% 73.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -11.9% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 126.9% 632.8% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 31.2% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 83.0% 1,537% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 49.9% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricKBSXSWBIUMAC
Gross margin 47.5% 27.4% 35.6%
EBITDA margin – 12.1% -114.1%
Operating margin 2.9% 6.6% -114.8%
Pretax margin 3.4% 6.0% -100.7%
Net margin 0.2% 4.4% -91.6%
FCF margin -1.8% 14.9% –
Operating cash flow margin 1.7% 20.6% –
Return on equity 3.1% 6.5% -9.3%
Return on assets 0.8% 4.7% -9.0%
Return on invested capital 0.9% 6.6% –
Return on capital employed 5.0% 8.1% -10.5%
Asset turnover 0.8x 1.1x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.8x 4.6x –
Stock comp / revenue – 1.5% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricKBSXSWBIUMAC
Debt / assets 47.2% 7.5% –
Debt / equity 1.8x 0.1x –
Net debt / EBITDA – 0.3x –
Debt / FCF -32.0x 0.5x –
Liabilities / assets 74.0% 28.6% 2.4%
Equity / assets 26.0% 71.4% 97.6%
Interest coverage 3.3x 3.7x -37,148x
Current ratio 0.9x 3.6x 53.8x
Quick ratio 0.4x 0.7x 41.6x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.3x 40.2x
Altman Z-score 1.68 5.14 55.65

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricKBSXSWBIUMAC
Dividend yield – 3.8% –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – 3.8% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusKBSXSWBIUMAC
Forward P/E 21.8xFY2026 23.6xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.06FY2026 $0.58FY2026 $-0.29FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +41.5%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +83.3% 0.0% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $59.34MFY2026 $587.52MFY2026 $53.31MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +23.7%FY2026 +12.2%FY2026 +376.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +11.1% +1.9% +116.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersKBSXSWBIUMAC
Held by institutions – 64.9% 59.7%
Institutions holding – 199 183
Change in shares held, QoQ – +14.6% +23.8%
Institutions buying – 113 134
Institutions selling – 51 40
Buyers to sellers – 2.22 3.35

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

KBSXSWBIUMAC
KBSX 1.00 0.06 0.17
SWBI 0.06 1.00 0.10
UMAC 0.17 0.10 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, KBSX, SWBI and UMAC?

Unusual Machines (UMAC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Fst (KBSX) $61.82M, Smith & Wesson Brands (SWBI) $589.95M, Unusual Machines (UMAC) $742.78M.

Which stock is cheaper, KBSX, SWBI and UMAC?

Smith & Wesson Brands (SWBI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Fst (KBSX) 763.6x, Smith & Wesson Brands (SWBI) 24.1x, Unusual Machines (UMAC) -31.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Fst (KBSX) is cheapest (Fst (KBSX) 21.8x, Smith & Wesson Brands (SWBI) 23.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Unusual Machines (UMAC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Fst (KBSX) +18.6%, Smith & Wesson Brands (SWBI) +17.0%, Unusual Machines (UMAC) +236.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Smith & Wesson Brands (SWBI) has the highest net margin (Fst (KBSX) 0.2%, Smith & Wesson Brands (SWBI) 4.4%, Unusual Machines (UMAC) -91.6%). On return on invested capital, Smith & Wesson Brands (SWBI) leads (Fst (KBSX) 0.9%, Smith & Wesson Brands (SWBI) 6.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Smith & Wesson Brands (SWBI) returned the most: Fst (KBSX) -13.8%, Smith & Wesson Brands (SWBI) +37.1%, Unusual Machines (UMAC) +8.9%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Smith & Wesson Brands (SWBI) has been the steadiest (Fst (KBSX) 81.4%, Smith & Wesson Brands (SWBI) 42.7%, Unusual Machines (UMAC) 126.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, KBSX, SWBI and UMAC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Smith & Wesson Brands (SWBI) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.