KBR vs ESLT vs GD Stock Comparison

Kbr, Elbit Systems and General Dynamics Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
KBR Kbr, Inc.
$40.22 +16.5% 1M -8.2% 1Y
Market cap
$5.07B
P/E
12.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.72B
Div. yield
1.68%
Defense Industrials
2 wins
ESLT Elbit Systems Ltd
$790.00 +7.5% 1M +62.2% 1Y
Market cap
$36.69B
P/E
56.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.55B
Div. yield
0.47%
Defense Industrials
5 wins
GD General Dynamics Corp
$354.89 +5.4% 1M +0.3% 1Y
Market cap
$96.02B
P/E
21.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$54.86B
Div. yield
1.77%
Defense Industrials
5 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

General Dynamics leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (General Dynamics 5, Elbit Systems 5, Kbr 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionKBRESLTGDLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.07B $36.69B $96.02B GD
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 12.0x 56.8x 21.4x KBR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 9.7x 56.7x 20.2x KBR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -3.6% +13.7% +9.1% ESLT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 5.5% 7.4% 8.2% GD
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 13.0% 17.8% 13.6% ESLT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.5x -0.9x 0.5x ESLT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.68% 0.47% 1.77% GD
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -8.2% +62.2% +0.3% ESLT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -1.4%/yr +38.5%/yr +11.9%/yr ESLT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 33.8% 44.7% 22.2% GD
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 59/100 60/100 71/100 GD

Percentile Scorecard

KBRESLTGD

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisKBRESLTGD
Valuation 99 #2 of 100 44 #56 of 100 87 #14 of 100
Growth 44 #55 of 97 88 #13 of 97 43 #56 of 97
Profitability 65 #34 of 96 73 #27 of 96 79 #21 of 96
Financial Health 16 #88 of 105 58 #45 of 105 63 #40 of 105
Shareholder Returns 70 #20 of 65 36 #42 of 65 86 #10 of 65
Overall 59 60 71
  • KBR ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense
  • ESLT ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense
  • GD ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodKBRESLTGDSPY
1 month +16.5%+7.5%+5.4% -0.2%
3 months +7.5%-3.5%-9.8% +3.9%
6 months +11.7%-5.3%+13.1% +8.2%
Year to date +0.0%+36.7%+5.4% +12.9%
1 year -8.2%+62.2%+0.3% +12.3%
3 years -29.6%+324.9%+49.0% +87.4%
3 years, per year -11.1%+62.0%+14.2% +23.3%
5 years -6.8%+409.3%+75.2% +67.9%
5 years, per year -1.4%+38.5%+11.9% +10.9%
10 years +172.7%+705.8%+136.4% +261.1%
10 years, per year +10.6%+23.2%+9.0% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureKBRESLTGDSPY
Volatility, 1Y 33.8%44.7%22.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 34.1%39.8%20.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.540.710.33 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.241.390.01 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -58.3%-35.5%-23.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -10.6%-22.1%-10.4% -1.2%
52-week high $44.98$1,014.33$395.97 $779.14
52-week low $30.06$454.95$312.53 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleKBRESLTGD
P/E now vs peer median 12.0xmedian 26.5x 56.8xmedian 26.5x 21.4xmedian 26.5x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 3.0x 4.3xmedian 3.0x 1.8xmedian 3.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.1xmedian 14.6x 37.0xmedian 14.6x 15.1xmedian 14.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 14.3xmedian 26.4x 37.0xmedian 26.4x 14.9xmedian 26.4x
P/B now vs peer median 3.1xmedian 2.5x 8.3xmedian 2.5x 3.6xmedian 2.5x
PEG now vs peer median 0.14median 0.90 1.80median 0.90 2.09median 0.90

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsKBRESLTGD
Revenue $7.72B $8.55B $54.86B
Gross profit $1.12B $2.14B $8.44B
Operating income $734.00M $787.82M $5.66B
Net income $429.00M $636.61M $4.49B
Free cash flow $355.00M $992.19M $6.45B
R&D – $582.72M –
EPS (diluted) $3.34 $13.56 $16.40
Cash & equivalents $312.00M $255.34M $4.33B
Total debt $2.55B $92.13M $7.52B
Shares (diluted) 127.00M 46.92M 273.52M
Enterprise value $3.35B $33.25B $83.13B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricKBRESLTGD
P/E 12.0x 56.8x 21.4x
P/FCF 14.3x 37.0x 14.9x
P/Operating cash flow 12.4x 37.0x 12.5x
P/S 0.7x 4.3x 1.8x
P/B 3.1x 8.3x 3.6x
P/Tangible book 5.3x 8.3x 3.8x
EV/EBITDA 8.1x 37.0x 15.1x
EV/EBIT 10.0x 45.5x 17.5x
EV/Revenue 0.9x 4.2x 1.8x
EV/FCF 20.6x 36.1x 15.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 17.9x 36.1x 12.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.14 1.80 2.09

Growth

14 metrics
MetricKBRESLTGD
Revenue growth (1Y) -3.6% 13.7% 9.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 4.9% 14.4% 10.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -4.5% 18.5% 8.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 6.4% 14.1% 8.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 3.5% 37.1% 9.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 22.3% 26.5% 10.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 16.3% 58.0% 9.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 86.3% 33.7% 10.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 18.0% 50.8% 8.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 87.6% 31.5% 10.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -18.5% 22.1% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -4.5% 82.7% 23.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -22.5% 105.8% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -2.2% 175.7% 28.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricKBRESLTGD
Gross margin 14.5% 25.0% 15.4%
EBITDA margin 11.7% 11.3% 12.0%
Operating margin 9.5% 9.2% 10.3%
Pretax margin 7.5% 8.1% 9.9%
Net margin 5.5% 7.4% 8.2%
FCF margin 4.6% 11.6% 11.8%
Operating cash flow margin 5.3% 11.6% 14.0%
Return on equity 26.6% 14.7% 17.0%
Return on assets 6.5% 4.7% 7.5%
Return on invested capital 13.0% 17.8% 13.6%
Return on capital employed 14.9% 11.0% 13.9%
Asset turnover 1.2x 0.6x 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.0x 1.6x 1.7x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.3% 0.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricKBRESLTGD
Debt / assets 38.3% 0.7% 12.5%
Debt / equity 1.6x 0.0x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.5x -0.9x 0.5x
Debt / FCF 7.2x 0.1x 1.2x
Liabilities / assets 75.4% 68.2% 55.4%
Equity / assets 24.6% 31.8% 44.6%
Interest coverage 5.0x – –
Current ratio 1.1x 1.4x 1.4x
Quick ratio 0.8x 0.8x 2.8x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.2x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 2.56 – 4.17

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricKBRESLTGD
Dividend yield 1.7% 0.5% 1.8%
Net buyback yield 3.0% 0.0% 0.4%
Shareholder yield 4.7% 0.5% 2.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) 19.8% 22.7% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 23.9% 14.5% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 4.9% -54.3% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 7.2% -17.4% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusKBRESLTGD
Forward P/E 9.7xFY2026 56.7xFY2026 20.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.13FY2026 $13.93FY2026 $17.56FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +5.1%FY2026 +22.3%FY2026 +13.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -6.8% +21.8% +8.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $8.58BFY2026 $8.84BFY2026 $53.43BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +10.2%FY2026 +11.3%FY2026 +1.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -3.3% +21.1% +12.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersKBRESLTGD
Held by institutions 100.0% 19.9% 86.5%
Institutions holding 363 384 2,218
Change in shares held, QoQ +7.4% -7.1% +0.1%
Institutions buying 206 202 1,018
Institutions selling 115 106 832
Buyers to sellers 1.79 1.91 1.22

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

KBRESLTGD
KBR 1.00 0.29 0.49
ESLT 0.29 1.00 0.41
GD 0.49 0.41 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, KBR, ESLT and GD?

General Dynamics (GD) is the largest by market capitalisation: Kbr (KBR) $5.07B, Elbit Systems (ESLT) $36.69B, General Dynamics (GD) $96.02B.

Which stock is cheaper, KBR, ESLT and GD?

Kbr (KBR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Kbr (KBR) 12.0x, Elbit Systems (ESLT) 56.8x, General Dynamics (GD) 21.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Kbr (KBR) is cheapest (Kbr (KBR) 9.7x, Elbit Systems (ESLT) 56.7x, General Dynamics (GD) 20.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Elbit Systems (ESLT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Kbr (KBR) -3.6%, Elbit Systems (ESLT) +13.7%, General Dynamics (GD) +9.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

General Dynamics (GD) has the highest net margin (Kbr (KBR) 5.5%, Elbit Systems (ESLT) 7.4%, General Dynamics (GD) 8.2%). On return on invested capital, Elbit Systems (ESLT) leads (Kbr (KBR) 13.0%, Elbit Systems (ESLT) 17.8%, General Dynamics (GD) 13.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Elbit Systems (ESLT) returned the most: Kbr (KBR) -8.2%, Elbit Systems (ESLT) +62.2%, General Dynamics (GD) +0.3%. Over five years, Elbit Systems (ESLT) compounded fastest (Kbr (KBR) -1.4%/yr, Elbit Systems (ESLT) +38.5%/yr, General Dynamics (GD) +11.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

General Dynamics (GD) has the highest dividend yield: Kbr (KBR) 1.68%, Elbit Systems (ESLT) 0.47%, General Dynamics (GD) 1.77%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, General Dynamics (GD) has been the steadiest (Kbr (KBR) 33.8%, Elbit Systems (ESLT) 44.7%, General Dynamics (GD) 22.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, KBR, ESLT and GD?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, General Dynamics (GD) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.