JD vs LITB vs PRTS Stock Comparison

JD.com, LightInTheBox Holding and CarParts.com Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
JD JD.com, Inc.
$25.24 -4.8% 1M -24.0% 1Y
Market cap
$30.62B
P/E
16.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$189.20B
Div. yield
3.96%
Online Retail Consumer Discretionary
4 wins
PRTS CarParts.com, Inc.
$7.91 -7.6% 1M +13.8% 1Y
Market cap
$63.74M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$515.80M
Div. yield
–
Online Retail Consumer Discretionary
1 win

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

JD.com leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (JD.com 4, LightInTheBox Holding 4, CarParts.com 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionJDLITBPRTSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $30.62B $50.65M $63.74M JD
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 16.8x 5.8x -2.2x LITB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 8.4x 5.6x — LITB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.6% +4.4% -10.7% JD
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.1% 4.0% -5.4% LITB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.6% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -1.7x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 3.96% — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -24.0% -5.1% +13.8% PRTS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -20.8%/yr -21.5%/yr -44.3%/yr JD
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 29.7% 74.4% 74.4% JD
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 70/100 82/100 24/100 LITB

Percentile Scorecard

JDLITBPRTS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisJDLITBPRTS
Valuation 97 #2 of 35 94 #3 of 35 15 #30 of 35
Growth 40 #19 of 31 87 #5 of 31 13 #27 of 31
Profitability 67 #11 of 31 97 #2 of 31 37 #20 of 31
Financial Health 76 #11 of 43 52 #21 of 43 57 #19 of 43
Shareholder Returns – – 0 #12 of 12
Overall 70 82 24
  • JD ranked among 43 companies in Retail
  • LITB ranked among 43 companies in Retail
  • PRTS ranked among 43 companies in Retail

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodJDLITBPRTSSPY
1 month -4.8%-8.8%-7.6% -0.8%
3 months -18.4%-9.7%+61.4% +3.5%
6 months -15.2%+33.3%-17.4% +7.0%
Year to date -12.1%+25.0%+58.2% +12.2%
1 year -24.0%-5.1%+13.8% +13.0%
3 years -1.6%-63.8%-77.0% +86.3%
3 years, per year -0.5%-28.8%-38.8% +23.1%
5 years -68.8%-70.1%-94.6% +68.6%
5 years, per year -20.8%-21.5%-44.3% +11.0%
10 years -4.7%-81.6%-74.0% +258.0%
10 years, per year -0.5%-15.6%-12.6% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureJDLITBPRTSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 29.7%74.4%74.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 27.2%70.0%72.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.610.831.41 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.81-0.070.19 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -76.6%-90.6%-97.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -26.9%-26.7%-20.9% -1.8%
52-week high $34.53$3.82$10.00 $779.14
52-week low $25.19$1.69$3.88 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleJDLITBPRTS
P/E now vs peer median 16.8xmedian 13.6x 5.8xmedian 13.6x -2.2xmedian 13.6x
P/S now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 0.2x 0.2xmedian 0.2x 0.1xmedian 0.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 6.9x 3.9xmedian 6.9x -3.0xmedian 6.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 4.1xmedian 15.1x —median 15.1x -5.6xmedian 15.1x
P/B now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 0.9x -49.9xmedian 0.9x 1.1xmedian 0.9x
PEG now vs peer median -1.75median 0.40 0.20median 0.40 0.05median 0.40

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsJDLITBPRTS
Revenue $189.20B $219.42M $515.80M
Gross profit $31.39B $147.80M $170.22M
Operating income $238.00M $9.14M -$27.59M
Net income $2.85B $8.84M -$27.61M
Free cash flow $7.50B – -$11.33M
R&D $3.82B – –
EPS (diluted) $1.44 $0.49 $-3.64
Cash & equivalents $13.11B $15.97M $38.17M
Total debt $14.71B $2.88M –
Shares (diluted) 1.49B 18.30M 7.58M
Enterprise value -$80.27B -$20.37M -$74.12M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricJDLITBPRTS
P/E 16.8x 5.8x -2.2x
P/FCF 4.1x – -5.6x
P/Operating cash flow 4.1x – -18.9x
P/S 0.2x 0.2x 0.1x
P/B 0.7x -49.9x 1.1x
P/Tangible book 0.8x -17.4x 1.1x
EV/EBITDA – 3.9x -3.0x
EV/EBIT 2.1x 3.9x -0.9x
EV/Revenue 0.0x 0.2x 0.0x
EV/FCF 0.1x – -2.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 0.1x – -7.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.75 0.20 0.05

Growth

14 metrics
MetricJDLITBPRTS
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.6% 4.4% -10.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 7.5% -28.7% -8.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 11.3% 6.9% -11.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -15.7% -24.8% -9.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) -94.3% 185.6% 47.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -61.0% 41.6% -64.1%
Net income growth (1Y) -51.0% 209.8% 48.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -3.5% 29.3% -59.6%
EPS growth (1Y) -58.9% 213.3% 61.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -9.6% 29.4% -44.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 119.5% – 65.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 1.2% – -26.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 119.5% – 43.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 1.2% – -29.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricJDLITBPRTS
Gross margin 16.6% 67.4% 33.0%
EBITDA margin – 4.1% -1.6%
Operating margin 0.1% 4.2% -5.3%
Pretax margin 1.8% 4.1% -5.6%
Net margin 1.1% 4.0% -5.4%
FCF margin 4.0% – -2.2%
Operating cash flow margin 4.0% – -0.7%
Return on equity 6.9% – -47.4%
Return on assets 2.8% 14.0% -14.7%
Return on invested capital 0.6% – –
Return on capital employed 0.5% – -26.4%
Asset turnover 1.8x 3.5x 2.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.6x – 0.1x
Stock comp / revenue – – 1.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricJDLITBPRTS
Debt / assets 2.4% 1.2% –
Debt / equity 0.1x -0.7x –
Net debt / EBITDA – -1.7x –
Debt / FCF 0.3x – –
Liabilities / assets 61.1% 101.6% 69.1%
Equity / assets 38.9% -1.6% 30.9%
Interest coverage 0.6x 537.8x -14.7x
Current ratio 1.1x 0.4x 1.7x
Quick ratio 0.6x 0.3x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.6x 0.3x 0.5x
Altman Z-score – -1.83 0.80

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricJDLITBPRTS
Dividend yield 4.0% – –
Net buyback yield – – -29.5%
Shareholder yield 4.0% – -29.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusJDLITBPRTS
Forward P/E 8.4xFY2026 5.6xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $3.00FY2026 $0.50FY2026 $-2.48FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +17.6%FY2026 +11.1%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +41.7% +26.0% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $193.47BFY2026 $222.98MFY2026 $479.38MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +3.4%FY2026 -0.6%FY2026 -12.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +2.2% +14.7% +16.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersJDLITBPRTS
Held by institutions 16.2% – 12.3%
Institutions holding 424 – 27
Change in shares held, QoQ +10.6% – -14.6%
Institutions buying 220 – 26
Institutions selling 130 – 1
Buyers to sellers 1.69 – 26.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

JDLITBPRTS
JD 1.00 0.16 -0.02
LITB 0.16 1.00 0.05
PRTS -0.02 0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, JD, LITB and PRTS?

JD.com (JD) is the largest by market capitalisation: JD.com (JD) $30.62B, LightInTheBox Holding (LITB) $50.65M, CarParts.com (PRTS) $63.74M.

Which stock is cheaper, JD, LITB and PRTS?

LightInTheBox Holding (LITB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (JD.com (JD) 16.8x, LightInTheBox Holding (LITB) 5.8x, CarParts.com (PRTS) -2.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, LightInTheBox Holding (LITB) is cheapest (JD.com (JD) 8.4x, LightInTheBox Holding (LITB) 5.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

JD.com (JD) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: JD.com (JD) +7.6%, LightInTheBox Holding (LITB) +4.4%, CarParts.com (PRTS) -10.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

LightInTheBox Holding (LITB) has the highest net margin (JD.com (JD) 1.1%, LightInTheBox Holding (LITB) 4.0%, CarParts.com (PRTS) -5.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year CarParts.com (PRTS) returned the most: JD.com (JD) -24.0%, LightInTheBox Holding (LITB) -5.1%, CarParts.com (PRTS) +13.8%. Over five years, JD.com (JD) compounded fastest (JD.com (JD) -20.8%/yr, LightInTheBox Holding (LITB) -21.5%/yr, CarParts.com (PRTS) -44.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: JD.com (JD) 3.96%. LightInTheBox Holding (LITB) and CarParts.com (PRTS) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, JD.com (JD) has been the steadiest (JD.com (JD) 29.7%, LightInTheBox Holding (LITB) 74.4%, CarParts.com (PRTS) 74.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, JD, LITB and PRTS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, JD.com (JD) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.