JBL vs CLS Stock Comparison

Jabil and Celestica Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
JBL Jabil Inc
$273.98 -11.3% 1M +32.6% 1Y
Market cap
$29.16B
P/E
28.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$35.95B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
4 wins
CLS Celestica Inc
$259.98 -28.4% 1M -8.0% 1Y
Market cap
$28.45B
P/E
25.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$15.59B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
7 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Celestica leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Celestica 7, Jabil 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionJBLCLSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $29.16B $28.45B JBL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 28.0x 25.5x CLS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 15.9x 22.8x JBL
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +20.6% +47.3% CLS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.9% 7.2% CLS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 25.9% 37.9% CLS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.7x 0.2x CLS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +32.6% -8.0% JBL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +34.8%/yr +94.6%/yr CLS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 47.7% 79.0% JBL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 58/100 64/100 CLS

Percentile Scorecard

JBLCLS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisJBLCLS
Valuation 71 #33 of 112 55 #51 of 112
Growth 66 #38 of 109 94 #8 of 109
Profitability 68 #34 of 105 80 #22 of 105
Financial Health 19 #95 of 117 35 #76 of 117
Shareholder Returns 65 #29 of 82 54 #38 of 82
Overall 58 64
  • JBL ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware
  • CLS ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodJBLCLSSPY
1 month -11.3%-28.4% -1.0%
3 months -12.4%-14.8% +2.9%
6 months -19.8%-36.6% +6.4%
Year to date +20.2%-12.1% +11.4%
1 year +32.6%-8.0% +13.1%
3 years +120.1%+899.5% +79.4%
3 years, per year +30.1%+115.5% +21.5%
5 years +344.6%+2,683.5% +67.7%
5 years, per year +34.8%+94.6% +10.9%
10 years +1,163.7%+2,162.7% +255.2%
10 years, per year +28.9%+36.6% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureJBLCLSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 47.7%79.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 52.6%86.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.183.37 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.68-0.10 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -36.9%-54.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -29.0%-45.0% -2.5%
52-week high $385.63$472.40 $779.14
52-week low $192.49$249.52 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleJBLCLS
P/E now vs peer median 27.8xmedian 31.3x 26.8xmedian 31.3x
P/S now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 2.6x 1.9xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 12.7xmedian 19.6x 19.5xmedian 19.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 20.8xmedian 28.3x 57.6xmedian 28.3x
P/B now vs peer median 17.7xmedian 2.9x 12.1xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median 1.60median 1.15 —median 1.15

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsJBLCLS
Revenue $35.95B $15.59B
Gross profit $3.32B $1.86B
Operating income $1.70B $1.37B
Net income $1.04B $1.12B
Free cash flow $1.37B $518.70M
R&D $30.00M $154.10M
EPS (diluted) $9.75 $9.61
Cash & equivalents $1.74B $535.70M
Total debt $3.38B $810.40M
Shares (diluted) 106.90M 116.20M
Enterprise value $22.66B $26.64B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricJBLCLS
P/E 27.8x 26.8x
P/FCF 20.8x 57.6x
P/Operating cash flow 14.3x 26.1x
P/S 0.8x 1.9x
P/B 17.7x 12.1x
P/Tangible book 28.2x 13.4x
EV/EBITDA 12.7x 19.5x
EV/EBIT 17.8x 22.0x
EV/Revenue 0.8x 1.9x
EV/FCF 22.0x 58.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 15.1x 26.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.60 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricJBLCLS
Revenue growth (1Y) 20.6% 47.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.2% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 25.4% 55.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 5.0% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 44.2% 84.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 3.5% –
Net income growth (1Y) 58.6% 107.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 8.4% –
EPS growth (1Y) 64.5% 106.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 17.4% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 22.1% 108.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 4.9% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 17.2% 34.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 25.0% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricJBLCLS
Gross margin 9.2% 12.0%
EBITDA margin 6.6% 9.9%
Operating margin 4.7% 8.8%
Pretax margin 3.9% 8.4%
Net margin 2.9% 7.2%
FCF margin 3.8% 3.3%
Operating cash flow margin 5.6% 7.3%
Return on equity 70.7% 48.8%
Return on assets 4.1% 12.4%
Return on invested capital 25.9% 37.9%
Return on capital employed 43.1% 48.2%
Asset turnover 1.4x 1.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.9x 1.0x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricJBLCLS
Debt / assets 12.3% 8.3%
Debt / equity 2.1x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.7x 0.2x
Debt / FCF 2.5x 1.6x
Liabilities / assets 94.1% 74.7%
Equity / assets 5.9% 25.3%
Interest coverage – 21.9x
Current ratio 1.0x 1.2x
Quick ratio 0.4x 0.7x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 2.55 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricJBLCLS
Dividend yield 0.1% –
Net buyback yield 3.6% 0.2%
Shareholder yield 3.7% 0.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusJBLCLS
Forward P/E 15.9xFY2027 22.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $17.25FY2027 $11.40FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +31.8%FY2027 +91.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +36.2% +77.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $46.50BFY2027 $19.74BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +29.3%FY2027 +61.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +17.4% +69.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersJBLCLS
Held by institutions 96.9% 69.0%
Institutions holding 1,120 873
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.2% +5.0%
Institutions buying 618 518
Institutions selling 373 272
Buyers to sellers 1.66 1.90

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

JBLCLS
JBL 1.00 0.62
CLS 0.62 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, JBL and CLS?

Jabil (JBL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Jabil (JBL) $29.16B, Celestica (CLS) $28.45B.

Which stock is cheaper, JBL and CLS?

Celestica (CLS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Jabil (JBL) 28.0x, Celestica (CLS) 25.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Jabil (JBL) is cheapest (Jabil (JBL) 15.9x, Celestica (CLS) 22.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Celestica (CLS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Jabil (JBL) +20.6%, Celestica (CLS) +47.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Celestica (CLS) has the highest net margin (Jabil (JBL) 2.9%, Celestica (CLS) 7.2%). On return on invested capital, Celestica (CLS) leads (Jabil (JBL) 25.9%, Celestica (CLS) 37.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Jabil (JBL) returned the most: Jabil (JBL) +32.6%, Celestica (CLS) -8.0%. Over five years, Celestica (CLS) compounded fastest (Jabil (JBL) +34.8%/yr, Celestica (CLS) +94.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Jabil (JBL) has been the steadiest (Jabil (JBL) 47.7%, Celestica (CLS) 79.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do JBL and CLS move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.62, a moderate positive relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, JBL and CLS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Celestica (CLS) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.