JBGS vs CUZ vs BPYPP Stock Comparison

JBG SMITH Properties, Cousins Properties and Brookfield Property Partners Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
JBGS JBG SMITH Properties
$11.59 +10.1% 1M -46.1% 1Y
Market cap
$673.76M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$508.41M
Div. yield
0.06%
Office REITs Real Estate
1 win
CUZ Cousins Properties Inc
$29.18 +1.8% 1M +9.7% 1Y
Market cap
$4.75B
P/E
739.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.03B
Div. yield
0.05%
Office REITs Real Estate
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Brookfield Property Partners leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Brookfield Property Partners 6, Cousins Properties 4, JBG SMITH Properties 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionJBGSCUZBPYPPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $673.76M $4.75B $14.34B BPYPP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -4.4x 739.6x -56.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 139.0x 11.2x BPYPP
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -1.1% +11.9% -9.5% CUZ
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -30.3% 0.6% -3.6% CUZ
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -1.3% — 0.0% BPYPP
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 16.9x 34.6x 6.9x BPYPP
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.06% 0.05% 0.00% JBGS
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -46.1% +9.7% +0.3% CUZ
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -16.8%/yr -5.8%/yr -10.2%/yr CUZ
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 34.8% 27.1% 21.1% BPYPP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 25/100 28/100 52/100 BPYPP

Percentile Scorecard

JBGSCUZBPYPP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisJBGSCUZBPYPP
Valuation 35 #95 of 145 26 #108 of 145 92 #13 of 145
Growth 11 #127 of 142 29 #101 of 142 67 #48 of 142
Profitability 4 #131 of 136 30 #96 of 136 18 #112 of 136
Financial Health 11 #124 of 139 38 #87 of 139 51 #69 of 139
Shareholder Returns 63 #49 of 131 19 #106 of 131 33 #88 of 131
Overall 25 28 52
  • JBGS ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • CUZ ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • BPYPP ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodJBGSCUZBPYPPSPY
1 month +10.1%+1.8%-0.3% -0.8%
3 months -18.8%-9.0%-6.6% +3.5%
6 months -24.6%+16.3%-6.8% +7.0%
Year to date -31.9%+13.2%+2.9% +12.2%
1 year -46.1%+9.7%+0.3% +13.0%
3 years -9.7%+63.2%+30.6% +86.3%
3 years, per year -3.4%+17.7%+9.3% +23.1%
5 years -60.1%-25.8%-41.5% +68.6%
5 years, per year -16.8%-5.8%-10.2% +11.0%
10 years —-5.1%— +258.0%
10 years, per year —-0.5%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureJBGSCUZBPYPPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 34.8%27.1%21.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 40.3%28.9%19.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.170.590.40 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.320.360.01 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -67.3%-58.2%-56.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -46.2%-9.7%-10.1% -1.8%
52-week high $21.55$32.30$16.70 $779.14
52-week low $10.05$21.34$14.38 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleJBGSCUZBPYPP
P/E now vs peer median -4.4xmedian 27.4x 747.4xmedian 27.4x -56.5xmedian 27.4x
P/S now vs peer median 1.7xmedian 4.2x 4.6xmedian 4.2x 2.0xmedian 4.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 22.9xmedian 14.2x 79.1xmedian 14.2x 10.6xmedian 14.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median -13.1xmedian 23.2x -13.0xmedian 23.2x —median 23.2x
P/B now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 1.3x 1.1xmedian 1.3x 0.3xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.04median 2.11 -11.34median 2.11 -1.36median 2.11

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsJBGSCUZBPYPP
Revenue $508.41M $1.03B $7.17B
Gross profit – $704.58M –
Operating income – -$322.93M –
Net income -$186.68M $6.88M -$113.00M
Free cash flow -$66.16M -$369.91M –
EPS (diluted) $-2.64 $0.04 $-0.27
Cash & equivalents $74.80M $6.70M $1.49B
Total debt $10.02B $3.73B $28.73B
Shares (diluted) 58.28M 165.29M 960.29M
Enterprise value $379.47M $4.73B $7.01B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricJBGSCUZBPYPP
P/E -4.4x 747.4x -56.5x
P/FCF -13.1x -13.0x –
P/Operating cash flow 14.2x 11.1x –
P/S 1.7x 4.6x 2.0x
P/B 0.8x 1.1x 0.3x
P/Tangible book 0.8x 1.1x 0.3x
EV/EBITDA 22.9x 79.1x 10.6x
EV/EBIT -70.1x -26.4x 11.5x
EV/Revenue 6.5x 8.2x 5.8x
EV/FCF -50.2x -23.1x –
EV/Operating cash flow 54.6x 19.7x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.04 -11.34 -1.36

Growth

14 metrics
MetricJBGSCUZBPYPP
Revenue growth (1Y) -1.1% 11.9% -9.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -5.6% 9.1% -4.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 11.0% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 10.2% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – -45.3% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -21.9% –
Net income growth (1Y) -4.3% -88.7% 83.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -83.2% -64.2% 62.1%
EPS growth (1Y) -17.4% -89.1% 63.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -113.4% -65.9% 41.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -39.5% 4.4% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -27.6% 5.4% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 42.6% 47.5% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 40.8% -98.0% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricJBGSCUZBPYPP
Gross margin – 68.1% –
EBITDA margin 28.6% 10.4% 55.0%
Operating margin – -31.2% –
Pretax margin -37.4% -48.2% 2.7%
Net margin -30.3% 0.6% -3.6%
FCF margin -13.0% -35.7% –
Operating cash flow margin 11.9% 41.7% –
Return on equity -16.8% 0.2% -0.3%
Return on assets -4.3% 0.1% -0.1%
Return on invested capital -1.3% – 0.0%
Return on capital employed – – 4.1%
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.1x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.3x 62.8x –
Stock comp / revenue 5.3% 1.6% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricJBGSCUZBPYPP
Debt / assets 59.4% 41.3% 28.1%
Debt / equity 2.3x 0.8x 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA 16.9x 34.6x 6.9x
Debt / FCF -38.2x -10.1x –
Liabilities / assets 74.7% 50.3% 58.3%
Equity / assets 25.3% 49.7% 41.7%
Interest coverage -0.3x -1.8x 1.1x
Current ratio – – 0.3x
Quick ratio – – 0.3x
Cash ratio – – 0.1x
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricJBGSCUZBPYPP
Dividend yield 6.0% 4.4% 10.9%
Net buyback yield 11.4% – -10.2%
Shareholder yield 17.4% 4.4% 0.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) -22.4% 3,132% –
Payout ratio (FCF) -63.3% -58.2% –
Dividend growth (1Y) -26.6% 4.8% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -25.4% 3.2% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusJBGSCUZBPYPP
Forward P/E – 139.0xFY2026 11.2xFY2023
EPS, next fiscal year $-2.03FY2026 $0.21FY2026 $1.34FY2023
EPS growth, next FY – -12.5%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +128.6% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $453.74MFY2026 $1.04BFY2026 $7.07BFY2023
Revenue growth, next FY -9.0%FY2026 +5.6%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +11.5% +10.4% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersJBGSCUZBPYPP
Held by institutions 97.6% 100.0% –
Institutions holding 206 393 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.8% +0.6% –
Institutions buying 86 200 –
Institutions selling 72 139 –
Buyers to sellers 1.19 1.44 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

JBGSCUZBPYPP
JBGS 1.00 0.49 0.00
CUZ 0.49 1.00 0.18
BPYPP 0.00 0.18 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, JBGS, CUZ and BPYPP?

Brookfield Property Partners (BPYPP) is the largest by market capitalisation: JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) $673.76M, Cousins Properties (CUZ) $4.75B, Brookfield Property Partners (BPYPP) $14.34B.

Which company is growing faster?

Cousins Properties (CUZ) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) -1.1%, Cousins Properties (CUZ) +11.9%, Brookfield Property Partners (BPYPP) -9.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Cousins Properties (CUZ) has the highest net margin (JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) -30.3%, Cousins Properties (CUZ) 0.6%, Brookfield Property Partners (BPYPP) -3.6%). On return on invested capital, Brookfield Property Partners (BPYPP) leads (JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) -1.3%, Brookfield Property Partners (BPYPP) 0.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Cousins Properties (CUZ) returned the most: JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) -46.1%, Cousins Properties (CUZ) +9.7%, Brookfield Property Partners (BPYPP) +0.3%. Over five years, Cousins Properties (CUZ) compounded fastest (JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) -16.8%/yr, Cousins Properties (CUZ) -5.8%/yr, Brookfield Property Partners (BPYPP) -10.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) has the highest dividend yield: JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) 0.06%, Cousins Properties (CUZ) 0.05%, Brookfield Property Partners (BPYPP) 0.00%. Brookfield Property Partners (BPYPP) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Brookfield Property Partners (BPYPP) has been the steadiest (JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) 34.8%, Cousins Properties (CUZ) 27.1%, Brookfield Property Partners (BPYPP) 21.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, JBGS, CUZ and BPYPP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Brookfield Property Partners (BPYPP) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.