J vs JLHL vs SNT Stock Comparison

Jacobs Solutions, Julong Holding and Senstar Technologies Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
J Jacobs Solutions Inc.
$150.83 +9.0% 1M -4.7% 1Y
Market cap
$17.67B
P/E
52.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$14.22B
Div. yield
0.93%
Engineering and Construction Industrials
7 wins
JLHL Julong Holding Ltd
$5.65 -4.6% 1M +35.0% 1Y
Market cap
$121.18M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Engineering and Construction Industrials
1 win

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Jacobs Solutions leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Jacobs Solutions 7, Julong Holding 1, Senstar Technologies 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionJJLHLSNTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $17.67B $121.18M $38.50M J
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 52.5x — 78.2x J
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 22.2x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +20.1% — -3.2% J
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.4% — 1.3% J
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 5.8% — 0.7% J
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.7x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.93% — 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -4.7% +35.0% -65.7% JLHL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +5.4%/yr — -16.6%/yr J
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 33.0% 261.9% 59.3% J
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 46/100 — 49/100 SNT

Percentile Scorecard

JJLHLSNT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisJJLHLSNT
Valuation 39 #32 of 52 – 71 #34 of 113
Growth 33 #25 of 37 – 2 #94 of 96
Profitability 53 #18 of 37 – 35 #60 of 92
Financial Health 45 #32 of 57 52 #28 of 57 89 #15 of 125
Shareholder Returns 60 #11 of 26 – –
Overall 46 – 49
  • J ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services
  • JLHL ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services
  • SNT ranked among 130 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodJJLHLSNTSPY
1 month +9.0%-4.6%+0.6% +0.9%
3 months +11.0%-1.7%-1.8% +5.9%
6 months +20.1%-59.5%-40.6% +8.5%
Year to date +13.9%+40.2%-65.8% +13.3%
1 year -4.7%+35.0%-65.7% +12.4%
3 years +39.1%—+44.7% +88.1%
3 years, per year +11.6%—+13.1% +23.5%
5 years +29.9%—-59.7% +68.2%
5 years, per year +5.4%—-16.6% +11.0%
10 years +256.8%—-63.3% +263.4%
10 years, per year +13.6%—-9.5% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureJJLHLSNTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 33.0%261.9%59.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 36.1%229.6%60.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.780.750.90 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.140.13-1.11 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -34.8%-93.2%-74.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -4.8%-87.4%-66.4% -0.9%
52-week high $158.36$44.80$4.91 $779.14
52-week low $107.27$3.05$1.34 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleJJLHLSNT
P/E now vs peer median 52.5xmedian 27.7x —median 27.7x 78.2xmedian 21.5x
P/S now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 0.8x —median 0.8x 1.0xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 22.8xmedian 12.4x —median 12.4x —median 11.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 27.4xmedian 23.7x —median 23.7x —median 13.9x
P/B now vs peer median 5.4xmedian 2.5x 10.4xmedian 2.5x 0.9xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median -2.47median 0.57 —median 0.57 —median 0.92

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsJJLHLSNT
Revenue $14.22B – $36.80M
Gross profit $3.14B – $23.34M
Operating income $649.64M – $729.00K
Net income $301.35M – $378.00K
Free cash flow $644.54M – –
R&D – – $3.98M
EPS (diluted) $2.85 – $0.02
Cash & equivalents $1.17B $6.27M $7.88M
Total debt $3.58B – $1.14M
Shares (diluted) 118.90M 20.39M 23.46M
Enterprise value $12.32B $100.30M -$24.22M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricJJLHLSNT
P/E 52.5x – 78.2x
P/FCF 27.4x – –
P/Operating cash flow 24.0x – –
P/S 1.2x – 1.0x
P/B 5.4x 10.4x 0.9x
P/Tangible book 6.6x 10.4x 0.9x
EV/EBITDA 22.8x – –
EV/EBIT 30.9x – 42.4x
EV/Revenue 1.4x – 0.8x
EV/FCF 31.1x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 27.3x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -2.47 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricJJLHLSNT
Revenue growth (1Y) 20.1% – -3.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 28.1% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 6.3% – -7.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 5.8% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -23.4% – -86.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 14.0% – –
Net income growth (1Y) -40.0% – -92.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -26.5% – –
EPS growth (1Y) -30.4% – -90.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -21.3% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 47.1% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -10.7% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 56.4% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -10.1% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricJJLHLSNT
Gross margin 22.1% – 63.4%
EBITDA margin 6.2% – –
Operating margin 4.6% – 2.0%
Pretax margin 3.6% – 2.4%
Net margin 2.4% – 1.3%
FCF margin 4.5% – –
Operating cash flow margin 5.2% – –
Return on equity 9.2% – 0.9%
Return on assets 2.5% – 0.7%
Return on invested capital 5.8% – 0.7%
Return on capital employed 8.2% – 1.6%
Asset turnover 1.2x – 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.4x – –
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricJJLHLSNT
Debt / assets 30.5% 2.5% 0.8%
Debt / equity 1.1x 0.1x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.7x – –
Debt / FCF 5.6x – –
Liabilities / assets 72.2% 79.9% 20.6%
Equity / assets 27.8% 20.1% 79.4%
Interest coverage 3.9x – –
Current ratio 1.3x 1.2x 3.6x
Quick ratio 1.6x 1.1x 2.2x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.1x 1.0x
Altman Z-score 2.87 – 3.24

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricJJLHLSNT
Dividend yield 0.9% – –
Net buyback yield 3.8% – –
Shareholder yield 4.8% – 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) 53.6% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 25.1% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 6.9% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 8.9% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusJJLHLSNT
Forward P/E 22.2xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $6.78FY2026 – –
EPS growth, next FY +10.8%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after +27.6% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $9.78BFY2026 – –
Revenue growth, next FY -18.7%FY2026 – –
Revenue growth, the year after -0.5% – –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersJJLHLSNT
Held by institutions 92.2% – –
Institutions holding 872 – –
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.0% – –
Institutions buying 376 – –
Institutions selling 360 – –
Buyers to sellers 1.04 – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

JJLHLSNT
J 1.00 -0.09 0.01
JLHL -0.09 1.00 0.02
SNT 0.01 0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, J, JLHL and SNT?

Jacobs Solutions (J) is the largest by market capitalisation: Jacobs Solutions (J) $17.67B, Julong Holding (JLHL) $121.18M, Senstar Technologies (SNT) $38.50M.

Which stock is cheaper, J, JLHL and SNT?

Jacobs Solutions (J) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Jacobs Solutions (J) 52.5x, Senstar Technologies (SNT) 78.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Jacobs Solutions (J) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Jacobs Solutions (J) +20.1%, Senstar Technologies (SNT) -3.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Jacobs Solutions (J) has the highest net margin (Jacobs Solutions (J) 2.4%, Senstar Technologies (SNT) 1.3%). On return on invested capital, Jacobs Solutions (J) leads (Jacobs Solutions (J) 5.8%, Senstar Technologies (SNT) 0.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Julong Holding (JLHL) returned the most: Jacobs Solutions (J) -4.7%, Julong Holding (JLHL) +35.0%, Senstar Technologies (SNT) -65.7%. Over five years, Jacobs Solutions (J) compounded fastest (Jacobs Solutions (J) +5.4%/yr, Senstar Technologies (SNT) -16.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Jacobs Solutions (J) 0.93%, Senstar Technologies (SNT) 0.00%. Julong Holding (JLHL) and Senstar Technologies (SNT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Jacobs Solutions (J) has been the steadiest (Jacobs Solutions (J) 33.0%, Julong Holding (JLHL) 261.9%, Senstar Technologies (SNT) 59.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, J, JLHL and SNT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Jacobs Solutions (J) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.