ITMSF vs SRAD vs ESTC Stock Comparison

Intermap Technologies, Sportradar Group AG and Elastic Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SRAD Sportradar Group AG
$12.23 -7.6% 1M -54.9% 1Y
Market cap
$3.81B
P/E
635.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.62B
Div. yield
–
Data Infrastructure Technology
2 wins
ESTC Elastic N.V.
$105.51 +19.9% 1M +19.0% 1Y
Market cap
$11.09B
P/E
29.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.80B
Div. yield
–
Data Infrastructure Technology
7 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Elastic leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Elastic 7, Intermap Technologies 2, Sportradar Group AG 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionITMSFSRADESTCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $39.84M $3.81B $11.09B ESTC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -3.5x 635.9x 29.4x ESTC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 27.5x 47.0x 30.1x ITMSF
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -66.2% +24.7% +16.2% SRAD
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -147.8% 1.2% 20.8% ESTC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -8.6% 0.0% ESTC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.8x 1.4x -10.8x ESTC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -73.4% -54.9% +19.0% ESTC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -4.2%/yr -9.5%/yr -9.3%/yr ITMSF
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 84.5% 56.5% 58.1% SRAD
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 26/100 60/100 71/100 ESTC

Percentile Scorecard

ITMSFSRADESTC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisITMSFSRADESTC
Valuation 19 #101 of 124 79 #27 of 124 70 #38 of 124
Growth 1 #112 of 113 63 #43 of 113 81 #22 of 113
Profitability 20 #87 of 109 70 #33 of 109 67 #37 of 109
Financial Health 64 #47 of 127 56 #57 of 127 52 #61 of 127
Shareholder Returns – 31 #45 of 65 86 #10 of 65
Overall 26 60 71
  • ITMSF ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • SRAD ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • ESTC ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodITMSFSRADESTCSPY
1 month -14.1%-7.6%+19.9% -0.2%
3 months -25.7%-17.5%+70.0% +3.9%
6 months -61.5%-1.0%+122.4% +8.2%
Year to date -59.6%-48.5%+39.9% +12.9%
1 year -73.4%-54.9%+19.0% +12.3%
3 years +37.5%+39.8%+39.7% +87.4%
3 years, per year +11.2%+11.8%+11.8% +23.3%
5 years -19.1%-39.2%-38.5% +67.9%
5 years, per year -4.2%-9.5%-9.3% +10.9%
10 years -21.4%—— +261.1%
10 years, per year -2.4%—— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureITMSFSRADESTCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 84.5%56.5%58.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 99.0%64.3%59.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.860.561.14 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.87-0.970.33 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -78.5%-69.0%-76.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -73.7%-54.9%-0.7% -1.2%
52-week high $2.09$27.11$106.26 $779.14
52-week low $0.54$11.56$43.30 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleITMSFSRADESTC
P/E now vs peer median -3.5xmedian 38.6x 635.9xmedian 38.6x 29.4xmedian 38.6x
P/S now vs peer median 6.0xmedian 4.4x 2.4xmedian 4.4x 6.2xmedian 4.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -2.8xmedian 34.5x -13.9xmedian 34.5x 123.3xmedian 34.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -4.6xmedian 29.4x 7.5xmedian 29.4x 31.8xmedian 29.4x
P/B now vs peer median 2.3xmedian 3.3x 4.3xmedian 3.3x 8.6xmedian 3.3x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.28 21.97median 1.28 0.55median 1.28

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsITMSFSRADESTC
Revenue $6.65M $1.62B $1.80B
Gross profit – – $1.36B
Operating income -$9.75M – -$47.61M
Net income -$9.82M $19.94M $375.64M
Free cash flow -$8.57M $510.26M $349.04M
R&D – $44.37M $455.30M
EPS (diluted) $-0.16 $64,328.88 $3.59
Cash & equivalents $16.18M $286.82M $879.87M
Total debt $1.65M $49.28M $571.20M
Shares (diluted) 61.80M 310.00 104.64M
Enterprise value -$43.93M $2.10B $5.62B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricITMSFSRADESTC
P/E -3.5x 635.9x 29.4x
P/FCF -4.6x 7.5x 31.8x
P/Operating cash flow -5.6x 7.6x 31.3x
P/S 6.0x 2.4x 6.2x
P/B 2.3x 4.3x 8.6x
P/Tangible book 2.4x 4.3x 8.6x
EV/EBITDA -2.8x -13.9x 123.3x
EV/EBIT -2.5x -41.3x -214.3x
EV/Revenue 3.6x 2.1x 5.7x
EV/FCF -2.8x 6.8x 29.2x
EV/Operating cash flow -3.4x 6.9x 28.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 21.97 0.55

Growth

14 metrics
MetricITMSFSRADESTC
Revenue growth (1Y) -66.2% 24.7% 16.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 23.9% 17.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 16.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 18.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) -1,317% – -56.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – 37.5%
Net income growth (1Y) -1,584% -83.5% 549.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 51.8% 55.3%
EPS growth (1Y) -1,313% -94.7% 555.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 28.9% 53.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -365.1% 15.0% 11.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 30.5% 62.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -216.7% 15.7% 11.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 30.7% 63.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricITMSFSRADESTC
Gross margin – – 75.5%
EBITDA margin -128.3% -15.4% 4.6%
Operating margin -146.6% – -2.6%
Pretax margin -152.3% 1.4% -1.1%
Net margin -147.8% 1.2% 20.8%
FCF margin -129.0% 31.6% 19.4%
Operating cash flow margin -107.7% 31.0% 19.6%
Return on equity -51.9% 2.1% 29.2%
Return on assets -36.5% 0.7% 12.2%
Return on invested capital – -8.6% 0.0%
Return on capital employed -45.5% -3.5% -2.3%
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.5x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.7x 25.1x 0.9x
Stock comp / revenue 9.6% 4.2% 16.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricITMSFSRADESTC
Debt / assets 1.6% 0.4% 19.0%
Debt / equity 0.0x 0.0x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.8x 1.4x -10.8x
Debt / FCF 0.0x 0.0x 1.6x
Liabilities / assets 32.0% 69.5% 56.8%
Equity / assets 68.0% 30.5% 43.2%
Interest coverage -180.5x -0.8x -1.9x
Current ratio 3.3x 1.0x 1.8x
Quick ratio 3.2x 0.9x 1.6x
Cash ratio 2.9x 0.6x 1.4x
Altman Z-score -11.00 1.75 4.44

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricITMSFSRADESTC
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – -1.0% 3.1%
Shareholder yield – -1.0% 3.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusITMSFSRADESTC
Forward P/E 27.5xFY2026 47.0xFY2026 30.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.02FY2026 $0.26FY2026 $3.51FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -27.8%FY2026 +36.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +350.0% +100.0% +19.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $32.39MFY2026 $1.65BFY2026 $1.88BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +205.6%FY2026 +8.4%FY2026 +8.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +29.0% +10.8% +18.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersITMSFSRADESTC
Held by institutions – 17.8% 86.4%
Institutions holding – 151 371
Change in shares held, QoQ – -2.8% +1.7%
Institutions buying – 88 199
Institutions selling – 42 129
Buyers to sellers – 2.10 1.54

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ITMSFSRADESTC
ITMSF 1.00 0.04 0.13
SRAD 0.04 1.00 0.19
ESTC 0.13 0.19 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ITMSF, SRAD and ESTC?

Elastic (ESTC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) $39.84M, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) $3.81B, Elastic (ESTC) $11.09B.

Which stock is cheaper, ITMSF, SRAD and ESTC?

Elastic (ESTC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -3.5x, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) 635.9x, Elastic (ESTC) 29.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) is cheapest (Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) 27.5x, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) 47.0x, Elastic (ESTC) 30.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -66.2%, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) +24.7%, Elastic (ESTC) +16.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Elastic (ESTC) has the highest net margin (Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -147.8%, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) 1.2%, Elastic (ESTC) 20.8%). On return on invested capital, Elastic (ESTC) leads (Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) -8.6%, Elastic (ESTC) 0.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Elastic (ESTC) returned the most: Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -73.4%, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) -54.9%, Elastic (ESTC) +19.0%. Over five years, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) compounded fastest (Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -4.2%/yr, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) -9.5%/yr, Elastic (ESTC) -9.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) has been the steadiest (Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) 84.5%, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) 56.5%, Elastic (ESTC) 58.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ITMSF, SRAD and ESTC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Elastic (ESTC) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.