ITMSF vs SNOW vs NTAP Stock Comparison

Intermap Technologies, Snowflake and NetApp Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SNOW Snowflake Inc.
$339.93 +3.6% 1M +27.3% 1Y
Market cap
$115.21B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$5.43B
Div. yield
–
Data Infrastructure Technology
2 wins
NTAP NetApp, Inc.
$223.66 +9.4% 1M +93.0% 1Y
Market cap
$43.77B
P/E
30.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.39B
Div. yield
–
Server and Storage Hardware Technology
7 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

NetApp leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (NetApp 7, Snowflake 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionITMSFSNOWNTAPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $34.61M $115.21B $43.77B SNOW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -3.5x -105.6x 30.9x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 27.5x 158.8x 21.3x NTAP
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -66.2% +32.0% +12.2% SNOW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -147.8% -20.1% 19.2% NTAP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 36.7% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.8x — -0.5x NTAP
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -73.7% +27.3% +93.0% NTAP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -2.7%/yr -0.8%/yr +20.2%/yr NTAP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 84.5% 63.1% 44.8% NTAP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 26/100 47/100 58/100 NTAP

Percentile Scorecard

ITMSFSNOWNTAP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisITMSFSNOWNTAP
Valuation 18 #102 of 124 29 #88 of 124 41 #66 of 111
Growth 1 #112 of 113 68 #37 of 113 52 #52 of 108
Profitability 20 #87 of 109 50 #55 of 109 93 #8 of 104
Financial Health 64 #47 of 127 25 #95 of 127 29 #82 of 115
Shareholder Returns – 61 #25 of 63 73 #22 of 78
Overall 26 47 58
  • ITMSF ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • SNOW ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • NTAP ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodITMSFSNOWNTAPSPY
1 month -15.4%+3.6%+9.4% +0.9%
3 months -23.6%+20.1%+29.1% +5.9%
6 months -61.8%+140.7%+105.9% +8.5%
Year to date -59.6%+55.0%+108.9% +13.3%
1 year -73.7%+27.3%+93.0% +12.4%
3 years +37.5%+137.1%+211.5% +88.1%
3 years, per year +11.2%+33.4%+46.1% +23.5%
5 years -12.7%-3.9%+150.5% +68.2%
5 years, per year -2.7%-0.8%+20.2% +11.0%
10 years -21.4%—+562.5% +263.4%
10 years, per year -2.4%—+20.8% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureITMSFSNOWNTAPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 84.5%63.1%44.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 99.0%54.8%38.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.861.341.38 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.870.432.07 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -78.5%-73.0%-43.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -73.7%-7.9%-6.5% -0.9%
52-week high $2.09$368.93$239.18 $779.14
52-week low $0.54$121.11$94.11 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleITMSFSNOWNTAP
P/E now vs peer median -3.5xmedian 37.9x -108.8xmedian 37.9x 30.9xmedian 33.5x
P/S now vs peer median 6.0xmedian 4.4x 22.0xmedian 4.4x 5.9xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -2.8xmedian 34.5x -149.7xmedian 34.5x 21.0xmedian 19.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median -4.6xmedian 26.6x 100.2xmedian 26.6x 26.6xmedian 29.8x
P/B now vs peer median 2.3xmedian 3.4x 55.7xmedian 3.4x 29.3xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.24 18.42median 1.24 3.77median 1.10

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsITMSFSNOWNTAP
Revenue $6.65M $5.43B $7.39B
Gross profit – $3.64B $5.22B
Operating income -$9.75M -$1.24B $1.85B
Net income -$9.82M -$1.09B $1.42B
Free cash flow -$8.57M $1.20B $1.65B
R&D – $2.11B $1.02B
EPS (diluted) $-0.16 $-3.12 $7.09
Cash & equivalents $16.18M $1.71B $1.57B
Total debt $1.65M – $2.49B
Shares (diluted) 61.80M 349.26M 200.00M
Enterprise value -$49.16M $102.53B $26.59B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricITMSFSNOWNTAP
P/E -3.5x -108.8x 30.9x
P/FCF -4.6x 100.2x 26.6x
P/Operating cash flow -5.6x 95.6x 23.1x
P/S 6.0x 22.0x 5.9x
P/B 2.3x 55.7x 29.3x
P/Tangible book 2.4x 69.5x 30.1x
EV/EBITDA -2.8x -149.7x 21.0x
EV/EBIT -2.5x -95.0x 23.1x
EV/Revenue 3.6x 21.6x 5.8x
EV/FCF -2.8x 98.3x 25.9x
EV/Operating cash flow -3.4x 93.7x 22.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 18.42 3.77

Growth

14 metrics
MetricITMSFSNOWNTAP
Revenue growth (1Y) -66.2% 32.0% 12.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 30.5% 6.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 32.9% 13.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 31.0% 7.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) -1,317% 19.7% 35.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -7.2% 25.3%
Net income growth (1Y) -1,584% 21.1% 21.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -8.2% 5.5%
EPS growth (1Y) -1,313% 24.1% 22.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -5.9% 8.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -365.1% 49.6% 3.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 22.7% 14.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -216.7% 59.1% -0.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 22.4% 15.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricITMSFSNOWNTAP
Gross margin – 67.0% 70.6%
EBITDA margin -128.3% -14.4% 27.5%
Operating margin -146.6% -22.8% 25.0%
Pretax margin -152.3% -19.8% 24.7%
Net margin -147.8% -20.1% 19.2%
FCF margin -129.0% 22.0% 22.3%
Operating cash flow margin -107.7% 23.1% 25.7%
Return on equity -51.9% -53.2% 99.6%
Return on assets -36.5% -12.6% 13.1%
Return on invested capital – – 36.7%
Return on capital employed -45.5% -25.2% 29.4%
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.6x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.7x -1.1x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 9.6% 30.2% 5.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricITMSFSNOWNTAP
Debt / assets 1.6% – 22.7%
Debt / equity 0.0x – 1.7x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.8x – -0.5x
Debt / FCF 0.0x – 1.5x
Liabilities / assets 32.0% 75.3% 86.4%
Equity / assets 68.0% 24.7% 13.6%
Interest coverage -180.5x -148.8x –
Current ratio 3.3x 0.9x 1.2x
Quick ratio 3.2x 0.8x 1.0x
Cash ratio 2.9x 0.6x 0.8x
Altman Z-score -11.00 9.46 4.16

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricITMSFSNOWNTAP
Dividend yield – – 0.9%
Net buyback yield – 0.4% 1.7%
Shareholder yield – 0.4% 2.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusITMSFSNOWNTAP
Forward P/E 27.5xFY2026 158.8xFY2026 21.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.02FY2026 $2.14FY2026 $10.50FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +71.2%FY2026 +29.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +350.0% +36.9% +8.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $32.39MFY2026 $6.16BFY2026 $8.49BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +205.6%FY2026 +31.5%FY2026 +22.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +29.0% +41.5% +8.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersITMSFSNOWNTAP
Held by institutions – 79.8% 97.4%
Institutions holding – 1,459 959
Change in shares held, QoQ – +9.1% -1.0%
Institutions buying – 850 501
Institutions selling – 473 336
Buyers to sellers – 1.80 1.49

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ITMSFSNOWNTAP
ITMSF 1.00 0.13 0.13
SNOW 0.13 1.00 0.26
NTAP 0.13 0.26 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ITMSF, SNOW and NTAP?

Snowflake (SNOW) is the largest by market capitalisation: Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) $34.61M, Snowflake (SNOW) $115.21B, NetApp (NTAP) $43.77B.

Which company is growing faster?

Snowflake (SNOW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -66.2%, Snowflake (SNOW) +32.0%, NetApp (NTAP) +12.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

NetApp (NTAP) has the highest net margin (Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -147.8%, Snowflake (SNOW) -20.1%, NetApp (NTAP) 19.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year NetApp (NTAP) returned the most: Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -73.7%, Snowflake (SNOW) +27.3%, NetApp (NTAP) +93.0%. Over five years, NetApp (NTAP) compounded fastest (Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -2.7%/yr, Snowflake (SNOW) -0.8%/yr, NetApp (NTAP) +20.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, NetApp (NTAP) has been the steadiest (Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) 84.5%, Snowflake (SNOW) 63.1%, NetApp (NTAP) 44.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ITMSF, SNOW and NTAP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, NetApp (NTAP) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.