ITMSF vs ROC vs SSGC Stock Comparison

Intermap Technologies, Rank One Computing and SafeSpace Global Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SSGC SafeSpace Global Corp
$0.06 -25.0% 1M -82.4% 1Y
Market cap
$12.32M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$53.72K
Div. yield
–
Computer Vision Technology

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Rank One Computing leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Rank One Computing 4, Intermap Technologies 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionITMSFROCSSGCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $34.00M $66.78M $12.32M ROC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -3.5x -16.7x -1.6x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 27.5x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -66.2% — -73.3% ITMSF
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -147.8% -25.4% -14,125.2% ROC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.8x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -73.4% — -82.4% ITMSF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -4.2%/yr — -19.7%/yr ITMSF
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 84.5% 72.0% 143.0% ROC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 26/100 57/100 19/100 ROC

Percentile Scorecard

ITMSFROCSSGC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisITMSFROCSSGC
Valuation 19 #101 of 124 29 #88 of 124 1 #123 of 124
Growth 1 #112 of 113 – 5 #108 of 113
Profitability 20 #87 of 109 54 #51 of 109 3 #106 of 109
Financial Health 64 #47 of 127 88 #16 of 127 69 #40 of 127
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 26 57 19
  • ITMSF ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • ROC ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • SSGC ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodITMSFROCSSGCSPY
1 month -14.1%-13.9%-25.0% -0.2%
3 months -25.7%-18.6%-40.0% +3.9%
6 months -61.5%-47.6%-45.5% +8.2%
Year to date -59.6%—-72.7% +12.9%
1 year -73.4%—-82.4% +12.3%
3 years +37.5%—-40.0% +87.4%
3 years, per year +11.2%—-15.7% +23.3%
5 years -19.1%—-66.7% +67.9%
5 years, per year -4.2%—-19.7% +10.9%
10 years -21.4%—— +261.1%
10 years, per year -2.4%—— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureITMSFROCSSGCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 84.5%72.0%143.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 99.0%68.7%175.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.860.41-0.36 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.87—-0.58 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -78.5%-53.6%-95.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -73.7%-52.7%-82.4% -1.2%
52-week high $2.09$7.31$0.34 $779.14
52-week low $0.54$3.39$0.06 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleITMSFROCSSGC
P/E now vs peer median -3.5xmedian 38.6x -16.5xmedian 38.6x -1.5xmedian 38.6x
P/S now vs peer median 6.0xmedian 4.4x 4.2xmedian 4.4x 212.1xmedian 4.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -2.8xmedian 34.5x -14.4xmedian 34.5x -1.9xmedian 34.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -4.6xmedian 29.4x -10.7xmedian 29.4x -2.5xmedian 29.4x
P/B now vs peer median 2.3xmedian 3.3x 3.7xmedian 3.3x 5.8xmedian 3.3x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.28 —median 1.28 0.12median 1.28

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsITMSFROCSSGC
Revenue $6.65M $15.78M $53.72K
Gross profit – $13.08M $25.36K
Operating income -$9.75M -$3.98M -$7.80M
Net income -$9.82M -$4.01M -$7.59M
Free cash flow -$8.57M -$6.17M -$4.52M
R&D – $7.15M –
EPS (diluted) $-0.16 $-0.21 $-0.04
Cash & equivalents $16.18M $11.91M $1.74M
Total debt $1.65M – –
Shares (diluted) 61.80M 19.08M 189.55M
Enterprise value -$49.78M $37.92M -$6.79M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricITMSFROCSSGC
P/E -3.5x -16.5x -1.5x
P/FCF -4.6x -10.7x -2.5x
P/Operating cash flow -5.6x -10.7x -2.1x
P/S 6.0x 4.2x 212.1x
P/B 2.3x 3.7x 5.8x
P/Tangible book 2.4x 3.7x 5.9x
EV/EBITDA -2.8x -14.4x -1.9x
EV/EBIT -2.5x -13.6x -1.2x
EV/Revenue 3.6x 3.4x 179.7x
EV/FCF -2.8x -8.8x -2.1x
EV/Operating cash flow -3.4x -8.8x -1.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – 0.12

Growth

14 metrics
MetricITMSFROCSSGC
Revenue growth (1Y) -66.2% – -73.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -1,317% – -107.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – -100.2%
Net income growth (1Y) -1,584% – -125.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – -82.7%
EPS growth (1Y) -1,313% – -96.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – -12.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -365.1% – -203.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -260.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -216.7% – -148.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -236.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricITMSFROCSSGC
Gross margin – 82.9% 47.2%
EBITDA margin -128.3% -23.8% -9,232%
Operating margin -146.6% -25.2% -14,518%
Pretax margin -152.3% -25.8% -14,283%
Net margin -147.8% -25.4% -14,125%
FCF margin -129.0% -39.1% -8,418%
Operating cash flow margin -107.7% -39.1% -10,294%
Return on equity -51.9% -22.2% -210.5%
Return on assets -36.5% -18.0% -177.3%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed -45.5% -21.0% -198.3%
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.7x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.7x 1.5x 0.7x
Stock comp / revenue 9.6% 4.1% 1,842%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricITMSFROCSSGC
Debt / assets 1.6% – –
Debt / equity 0.0x – –
Net debt / EBITDA 1.8x – –
Debt / FCF 0.0x – –
Liabilities / assets 32.0% 18.9% 34.8%
Equity / assets 68.0% 81.1% 65.2%
Interest coverage -180.5x – –
Current ratio 3.3x 5.4x 5.4x
Quick ratio 3.2x 5.2x 4.4x
Cash ratio 2.9x 3.5x 4.4x
Altman Z-score -11.00 9.90 -13.96

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricITMSFROCSSGC
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – 0.0% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusITMSFROCSSGC
Forward P/E 27.5xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.02FY2026 $-0.31FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +350.0% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $32.39MFY2026 $19.28MFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +205.6%FY2026 +13.5%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +29.0% +76.1% –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ITMSFROCSSGC
ITMSF 1.00 -0.06 -0.04
ROC -0.06 1.00 0.04
SSGC -0.04 0.04 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ITMSF, ROC and SSGC?

Rank One Computing (ROC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) $34.00M, Rank One Computing (ROC) $66.78M, SafeSpace Global (SSGC) $12.32M.

Which company is growing faster?

Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -66.2%, SafeSpace Global (SSGC) -73.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Rank One Computing (ROC) has the highest net margin (Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -147.8%, Rank One Computing (ROC) -25.4%, SafeSpace Global (SSGC) -14,125.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) returned the most: Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -73.4%, SafeSpace Global (SSGC) -82.4%. Over five years, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) compounded fastest (Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -4.2%/yr, SafeSpace Global (SSGC) -19.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Rank One Computing (ROC) has been the steadiest (Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) 84.5%, Rank One Computing (ROC) 72.0%, SafeSpace Global (SSGC) 143.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ITMSF, ROC and SSGC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Rank One Computing (ROC) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.