IRM vs CTAS vs FSV Stock Comparison

Iron Mountain, Cintas and FirstService Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
IRM Iron Mountain Inc
$115.26 +3.5% 1M +8.3% 1Y
Market cap
$34.31B
P/E
82.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.56B
Div. yield
2.99%
Facility Services Industrials
3 wins
CTAS Cintas Corp
$214.80 +7.4% 1M +13.8% 1Y
Market cap
$85.82B
P/E
41.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.56B
Div. yield
0.87%
Facility Services Industrials
8 wins
FSV FirstService Corp
$141.20 +9.8% 1M -13.2% 1Y
Market cap
$6.46B
P/E
55.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.68B
Div. yield
1.04%
Facility Services Industrials
1 win

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Cintas leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Cintas 8, Iron Mountain 3, FirstService 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionIRMCTASFSVLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $34.31B $85.82B $6.46B CTAS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 82.0x 41.7x 55.8x CTAS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 49.7x 36.7x 24.2x FSV
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +17.4% +9.5% +3.7% IRM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 5.5% 17.8% 2.0% CTAS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 7.6% 28.2% 10.0% CTAS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 6.7x 0.7x 2.6x CTAS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 2.99% 0.87% 1.04% IRM
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +8.3% +13.8% -13.2% CTAS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +20.0%/yr +15.1%/yr -6.9%/yr IRM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 33.3% 23.8% 30.6% CTAS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 47/100 60/100 41/100 CTAS

Percentile Scorecard

IRMCTASFSV

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisIRMCTASFSV
Valuation 21 #89 of 112 20 #90 of 112 41 #66 of 112
Growth 90 #11 of 96 71 #29 of 96 56 #43 of 96
Profitability 64 #33 of 91 98 #3 of 91 62 #35 of 91
Financial Health 8 #115 of 125 70 #38 of 125 39 #77 of 125
Shareholder Returns 50 #34 of 67 39 #41 of 67 8 #62 of 67
Overall 47 60 41
  • IRM ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • CTAS ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • FSV ranked among 130 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodIRMCTASFSVSPY
1 month +3.5%+7.4%+9.8% -0.2%
3 months -8.3%0.0%-1.3% +3.9%
6 months +2.3%+23.3%-1.3% +8.2%
Year to date +39.0%+14.2%-9.2% +12.9%
1 year +8.3%+13.8%-13.2% +12.3%
3 years +98.0%+73.1%+3.0% +87.4%
3 years, per year +25.6%+20.1%+1.0% +23.3%
5 years +148.3%+101.7%-29.9% +67.9%
5 years, per year +20.0%+15.1%-6.9% +10.9%
10 years +251.8%+713.1%+235.6% +261.1%
10 years, per year +13.4%+23.3%+12.9% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureIRMCTASFSVSPY
Volatility, 1Y 33.3%23.8%30.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 34.4%24.3%31.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.170.110.65 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.250.58-0.43 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -40.0%-28.2%-44.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -13.4%-4.9%-14.5% -1.2%
52-week high $133.06$225.93$165.10 $779.14
52-week low $78.86$163.55$125.66 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleIRMCTASFSV
P/E now vs peer median 82.0xmedian 21.2x 41.7xmedian 21.2x 55.8xmedian 21.2x
P/S now vs peer median 4.5xmedian 0.9x 7.4xmedian 0.9x 1.1xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 20.3xmedian 11.9x 27.4xmedian 11.9x 14.6xmedian 11.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median -69.9xmedian 13.7x 42.2xmedian 13.7x 12.0xmedian 13.7x
P/B now vs peer median -26.8xmedian 2.4x 16.5xmedian 2.4x 6.9xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 31.37median 1.00 2.75median 1.00 149.61median 1.00

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsIRMCTASFSV
Revenue $7.56B $11.56B $5.68B
Gross profit $4.10B $5.89B $1.88B
Operating income $1.42B $2.70B $339.62M
Net income $434.46M $2.06B $199.45M
Free cash flow -$490.92M $2.03B $536.84M
EPS (diluted) $1.40 $5.10 $2.52
Cash & equivalents $204.79M $243.60M $160.76M
Total debt $17.35B $2.43B $1.55B
Shares (diluted) 299.85M 404.29M 45.75M
Enterprise value $33.83B $84.90B $6.32B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricIRMCTASFSV
P/E 82.0x 41.7x 55.8x
P/FCF -69.9x 42.2x 12.0x
P/Operating cash flow 20.7x 35.3x 15.5x
P/S 4.5x 7.4x 1.1x
P/B -26.8x 16.5x 6.9x
P/Tangible book -13.6x 17.4x 6.9x
EV/EBITDA 20.3x 27.4x 14.6x
EV/EBIT 36.3x 32.6x 23.1x
EV/Revenue 6.8x 7.6x 1.4x
EV/FCF -104.8x 43.3x 14.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 31.1x 36.2x 18.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 31.37 2.75 149.61

Growth

14 metrics
MetricIRMCTASFSV
Revenue growth (1Y) 17.4% 9.5% 3.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 13.0% 8.7% 9.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 13.5% 11.5% 2.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 11.1% 11.2% 11.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 35.4% 11.8% -0.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 12.8% 13.2% 8.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 867.3% 11.3% 4.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 4.1% 14.3% 6.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 897.5% 12.7% 12.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 2.6% 15.2% 0.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 31.7% 14.8% 0.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 17.2% 14.4% 23.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 50.3% 19.5% -1.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -60.8% 17.4% 19.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricIRMCTASFSV
Gross margin 54.2% 51.0% 33.1%
EBITDA margin 33.6% 27.8% 9.5%
Operating margin 18.8% 23.4% 6.0%
Pretax margin 6.7% 22.5% 4.8%
Net margin 5.5% 17.8% 2.0%
FCF margin -6.5% 17.6% 9.4%
Operating cash flow margin 21.9% 21.1% 7.4%
Return on equity – 39.8% 18.5%
Return on assets 2.0% 19.5% 4.5%
Return on invested capital 7.6% 28.2% 10.0%
Return on capital employed 7.5% 34.2% 9.8%
Asset turnover 0.3x 1.1x 1.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 3.8x 1.2x 2.1x
Stock comp / revenue 1.8% 1.1% 0.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricIRMCTASFSV
Debt / assets 79.0% 22.8% 34.9%
Debt / equity -13.5x 0.5x 1.7x
Net debt / EBITDA 6.7x 0.7x 2.6x
Debt / FCF -35.3x 1.2x 2.9x
Liabilities / assets 105.8% 51.1% 78.9%
Equity / assets -5.8% 48.9% 21.1%
Interest coverage – 25.3x –
Current ratio 0.7x 1.5x 1.7x
Quick ratio 0.6x 0.7x 1.2x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.1x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 1.76 13.27 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricIRMCTASFSV
Dividend yield 3.0% 0.9% 1.0%
Net buyback yield – 1.2% -9.4%
Shareholder yield 3.0% 2.0% -8.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) 229.5% 35.2% –
Payout ratio (FCF) -203.1% 35.6% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 16.5% 14.8% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 11.1% 15.5% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusIRMCTASFSV
Forward P/E 49.7xFY2026 36.7xFY2026 24.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.32FY2026 $5.85FY2026 $5.84FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +9.4%FY2026 +18.4%FY2026 +2.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +28.0% +10.4% +9.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $8.36BFY2026 $12.98BFY2026 $5.42BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +21.1%FY2026 +15.3%FY2026 -1.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +2.2% +6.8% +20.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersIRMCTASFSV
Held by institutions 86.2% 67.6% 69.9%
Institutions holding 1,161 1,430 275
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.9% +6.4% +7.2%
Institutions buying 598 657 147
Institutions selling 377 576 101
Buyers to sellers 1.59 1.14 1.46

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

IRMCTASFSV
IRM 1.00 0.00 0.08
CTAS 0.00 1.00 0.38
FSV 0.08 0.38 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, IRM, CTAS and FSV?

Cintas (CTAS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Iron Mountain (IRM) $34.31B, Cintas (CTAS) $85.82B, FirstService (FSV) $6.46B.

Which stock is cheaper, IRM, CTAS and FSV?

Cintas (CTAS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Iron Mountain (IRM) 82.0x, Cintas (CTAS) 41.7x, FirstService (FSV) 55.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, FirstService (FSV) is cheapest (Iron Mountain (IRM) 49.7x, Cintas (CTAS) 36.7x, FirstService (FSV) 24.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Iron Mountain (IRM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Iron Mountain (IRM) +17.4%, Cintas (CTAS) +9.5%, FirstService (FSV) +3.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Cintas (CTAS) has the highest net margin (Iron Mountain (IRM) 5.5%, Cintas (CTAS) 17.8%, FirstService (FSV) 2.0%). On return on invested capital, Cintas (CTAS) leads (Iron Mountain (IRM) 7.6%, Cintas (CTAS) 28.2%, FirstService (FSV) 10.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Cintas (CTAS) returned the most: Iron Mountain (IRM) +8.3%, Cintas (CTAS) +13.8%, FirstService (FSV) -13.2%. Over five years, Iron Mountain (IRM) compounded fastest (Iron Mountain (IRM) +20.0%/yr, Cintas (CTAS) +15.1%/yr, FirstService (FSV) -6.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Iron Mountain (IRM) has the highest dividend yield: Iron Mountain (IRM) 2.99%, Cintas (CTAS) 0.87%, FirstService (FSV) 1.04%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Cintas (CTAS) has been the steadiest (Iron Mountain (IRM) 33.3%, Cintas (CTAS) 23.8%, FirstService (FSV) 30.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, IRM, CTAS and FSV?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Cintas (CTAS) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.