IRDM vs TV vs LUNR Stock Comparison

Iridium Communications, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B and Intuitive Machines Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
IRDM Iridium Communications Inc.
$46.05 -3.9% 1M +172.0% 1Y
Market cap
$4.89B
P/E
30.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$902.97M
Div. yield
1.30%
Satellite Communications Communication Services
5 wins
TV Grupo Televisa, S.A.B.
$2.14 -8.9% 1M -22.2% 1Y
Market cap
$133.16B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.23B
Div. yield
–
Broadband and Cable Communication Services
3 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Iridium Communications leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Iridium Communications 5, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B 3, Intuitive Machines 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionIRDMTVLUNRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.89B $133.16B $2.63B TV
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 30.3x -272.0x -14.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 40.4x 11.9x — TV
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +3.6% +5.5% +116.9% LUNR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 18.1% -15.3% -26.8% IRDM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 5.1% 2.9% -560.6% IRDM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 5.1x 64.6x 0.3x LUNR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.30% 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +172.0% -22.2% -2.8% IRDM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +2.6%/yr -26.7%/yr — IRDM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 58.7% 38.3% 110.2% TV
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 47/100 33/100 25/100 IRDM

Percentile Scorecard

IRDMTVLUNR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisIRDMTVLUNR
Valuation 25 #37 of 49 4 #47 of 49 24 #76 of 100
Growth 75 #12 of 45 21 #36 of 45 27 #70 of 96
Profitability 66 #16 of 45 34 #30 of 45 27 #70 of 95
Financial Health 31 #34 of 49 75 #13 of 49 23 #81 of 105
Shareholder Returns 36 #24 of 37 – –
Overall 47 33 25
  • IRDM ranked among 51 companies in Telecommunications
  • TV ranked among 51 companies in Telecommunications
  • LUNR ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodIRDMTVLUNRSPY
1 month -3.9%-8.9%-19.7% +0.7%
3 months -3.3%-25.4%-4.7% +3.7%
6 months +17.9%-24.9%-53.9% +7.1%
Year to date +165.0%-26.5%-28.0% +12.8%
1 year +172.0%-22.2%-2.8% +11.9%
3 years +24.4%-1.8%+294.6% +85.2%
3 years, per year +7.6%-0.6%+58.1% +22.8%
5 years +13.6%-78.9%— +67.6%
5 years, per year +2.6%-26.7%— +10.9%
10 years +468.5%-91.3%— +262.0%
10 years, per year +19.0%-21.7%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureIRDMTVLUNRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 58.7%38.3%110.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 44.7%40.0%101.0% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.390.663.76 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.93-0.58-0.03 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -76.4%-86.3%-97.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -17.4%-37.8%-74.4% -1.2%
52-week high $55.72$3.44$45.70 $779.14
52-week low $15.84$2.14$8.05 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleIRDMTVLUNR
P/E now vs peer median 30.3xmedian 11.5x -272.0xmedian 11.5x -14.4xmedian 26.9x
P/S now vs peer median 5.4xmedian 1.1x 41.3xmedian 1.1x 5.4xmedian 3.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 17.5xmedian 6.8x 3,804xmedian 6.8x -25.3xmedian 15.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 17.6xmedian 5.9x —median 5.9x -14.0xmedian 27.2x
P/B now vs peer median 8.5xmedian 1.3x 20.8xmedian 1.3x -9.1xmedian 2.5x
PEG now vs peer median 0.26median 0.25 8.84median 0.25 0.35median 0.93

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsIRDMTVLUNR
Revenue $902.97M $3.23B $490.12M
Gross profit $645.23M $1.78B $83.23M
Operating income $171.59M $307.39M -$134.85M
Net income $163.03M -$116.03M -$184.98M
Free cash flow $277.57M – -$187.75M
R&D $21.63M – $14.69M
EPS (diluted) $1.50 $-0.01 $-0.81
Cash & equivalents $97.85M $1.70B $367.40M
Total debt $2.14B $14.34B $336.35M
Shares (diluted) 108.93M 68.12B 162.17M
Enterprise value $4.40B $125.45B $2.02B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricIRDMTVLUNR
P/E 30.3x -272.0x -14.4x
P/FCF 17.6x – -14.0x
P/Operating cash flow 12.5x – -20.8x
P/S 5.4x 41.3x 5.4x
P/B 8.5x 20.8x -9.1x
P/Tangible book 22.7x 26.7x -4.5x
EV/EBITDA 17.5x 3,804x -25.3x
EV/EBIT 40.4x 440.7x -19.3x
EV/Revenue 7.7x 42.0x 5.3x
EV/FCF 25.0x – -13.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 17.8x – -20.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.26 8.84 0.35

Growth

14 metrics
MetricIRDMTVLUNR
Revenue growth (1Y) 3.6% 5.5% 116.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 4.6% -11.8% 78.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 3.8% -37.1% 22,840%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 4.6% -18.9% 250.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) -26.3% 255.7% -104.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 46.9% 5.3% -65.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 29.5% 68.3% 37.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 107.7% -27.1% -267.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 26.6% -18.4% 60.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 115.5% -30.8% -41.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -1.5% – -540.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 7.1% – -220.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -9.1% – -366.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 5.9% – -75.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricIRDMTVLUNR
Gross margin 71.5% 55.2% 17.0%
EBITDA margin 43.9% 1.1% -21.0%
Operating margin 19.0% 9.5% -27.5%
Pretax margin 9.3% 8.3% -36.9%
Net margin 18.1% -15.3% -26.8%
FCF margin 30.7% – -38.3%
Operating cash flow margin 43.2% – -25.8%
Return on equity 11.8% -1.9% –
Return on assets 2.2% -0.9% -10.3%
Return on invested capital 5.1% 2.9% -560.6%
Return on capital employed 6.9% 2.7% -9.6%
Asset turnover 0.3x 0.2x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.4x – 0.7x
Stock comp / revenue 6.3% – 4.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricIRDMTVLUNR
Debt / assets 69.4% 34.8% 17.8%
Debt / equity 3.7x 0.7x -1.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 5.1x 64.6x 0.3x
Debt / FCF 7.7x – -1.8x
Liabilities / assets 81.3% 52.7% 115.4%
Equity / assets 18.7% 47.3% -15.4%
Interest coverage – 0.7x -10.0x
Current ratio 0.9x 2.4x 1.7x
Quick ratio 0.6x 1.8x 1.3x
Cash ratio 0.3x 1.5x 0.9x
Altman Z-score 1.51 12.35 0.73

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricIRDMTVLUNR
Dividend yield 1.3% – –
Net buyback yield 0.0% – –
Shareholder yield 1.3% 0.0% –
Payout ratio (earnings) 39.9% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 23.4% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 3.9% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 10.0% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusIRDMTVLUNR
Forward P/E 40.4xFY2026 11.9xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $1.14FY2026 $0.18FY2026 $-0.63FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +7.5%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after +12.3% +38.9% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $990.74MFY2026 $3.07BFY2026 $951.52MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +13.7%FY2026 -9.0%FY2026 +353.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +2.2% -4.0% +11.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersIRDMTVLUNR
Held by institutions 85.3% 0.2% 63.2%
Institutions holding 480 106 328
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.2% -4.9% +34.5%
Institutions buying 306 44 223
Institutions selling 124 33 71
Buyers to sellers 2.47 1.33 3.14

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

IRDMTVLUNR
IRDM 1.00 0.12 0.49
TV 0.12 1.00 0.09
LUNR 0.49 0.09 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, IRDM, TV and LUNR?

Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) is the largest by market capitalisation: Iridium Communications (IRDM) $4.89B, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) $133.16B, Intuitive Machines (LUNR) $2.63B.

Which company is growing faster?

Intuitive Machines (LUNR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Iridium Communications (IRDM) +3.6%, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) +5.5%, Intuitive Machines (LUNR) +116.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Iridium Communications (IRDM) has the highest net margin (Iridium Communications (IRDM) 18.1%, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) -15.3%, Intuitive Machines (LUNR) -26.8%). On return on invested capital, Iridium Communications (IRDM) leads (Iridium Communications (IRDM) 5.1%, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) 2.9%, Intuitive Machines (LUNR) -560.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Iridium Communications (IRDM) returned the most: Iridium Communications (IRDM) +172.0%, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) -22.2%, Intuitive Machines (LUNR) -2.8%. Over five years, Iridium Communications (IRDM) compounded fastest (Iridium Communications (IRDM) +2.6%/yr, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) -26.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Iridium Communications (IRDM) 1.30%, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) 0.00%. Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) and Intuitive Machines (LUNR) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) has been the steadiest (Iridium Communications (IRDM) 58.7%, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) 38.3%, Intuitive Machines (LUNR) 110.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, IRDM, TV and LUNR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Iridium Communications (IRDM) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.