IQV vs CRL vs DNA Stock Comparison

Iqvia Holdings, Charles River Laboratories International and Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
IQV Iqvia Holdings Inc.
$274.96 +2.2% 1M +26.2% 1Y
Market cap
$45.31B
P/E
32.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$17.31B
Div. yield
–
Contract Research Healthcare
9 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Iqvia Holdings leads on 9 of the 12 questions below (Iqvia Holdings 9, Charles River Laboratories International 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionIQVCRLDNALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $45.31B $17.94B $811.68M IQV
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 32.5x -75.7x -2.7x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 22.6x 34.5x — IQV
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +8.8% -0.7% -46.8% IQV
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 8.1% -6.0% -260.0% IQV
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.2% 1.6% — IQV
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.9x 6.3x — IQV
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +26.2% +108.6% +4.5% CRL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +1.0%/yr -3.5%/yr -53.0%/yr IQV
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 40.4% 45.7% 102.8% IQV
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 71/100 43/100 43/100 IQV

Percentile Scorecard

IQVCRLDNA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisIQVCRLDNA
Valuation 80 #3 of 11 50 #6 of 11 10 #10 of 11
Growth 80 #3 of 11 10 #10 of 11 50 #6 of 11
Profitability 90 #2 of 11 70 #4 of 11 10 #10 of 11
Financial Health 33 #9 of 13 42 #8 of 13 100 #1 of 13
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 71 43 43
  • IQV ranked among 13 companies in Pharma Services
  • CRL ranked among 13 companies in Pharma Services
  • DNA ranked among 13 companies in Pharma Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodIQVCRLDNASPY
1 month +2.2%+26.8%+6.4% +0.7%
3 months +15.6%+60.2%+57.7% +3.7%
6 months +73.6%+125.1%+50.6% +7.1%
Year to date +22.0%+88.4%+53.3% +12.8%
1 year +26.2%+108.6%+4.5% +11.9%
3 years +55.2%+128.4%-76.1% +85.2%
3 years, per year +15.8%+31.7%-37.9% +22.8%
5 years +5.2%-16.2%-97.7% +67.6%
5 years, per year +1.0%-3.5%-53.0% +10.9%
10 years +283.1%+394.5%— +262.0%
10 years, per year +14.4%+17.3%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureIQVCRLDNASPY
Volatility, 1Y 40.4%45.7%102.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 39.3%42.5%103.3% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.741.283.07 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.652.380.04 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -51.5%-77.3%-99.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -1.6%0.0%-15.0% -1.2%
52-week high $279.38$375.83$14.98 $779.14
52-week low $156.66$149.93$5.48 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleIQVCRLDNA
P/E now vs peer median 32.5xmedian 36.6x -75.7xmedian 36.6x -2.7xmedian 36.6x
P/S now vs peer median 2.6xmedian 2.6x 4.5xmedian 2.6x 7.3xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 17.0xmedian 31.1x 52.5xmedian 31.1x -3.1xmedian 31.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 21.8xmedian 21.8x 48.4xmedian 21.8x -4.6xmedian 21.8x
P/B now vs peer median 6.7xmedian 3.1x 6.3xmedian 3.1x 1.9xmedian 3.1x
PEG now vs peer median 2.82median 2.05 2.09median 2.05 0.03median 2.05

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsIQVCRLDNA
Revenue $17.31B $4.00B $111.86M
Gross profit $5.72B $1.31B $92.92M
Operating income $2.22B $90.14M -$290.69M
Net income $1.40B -$239.23M -$290.80M
Free cash flow $2.08B $370.61M -$174.80M
R&D – – $215.61M
EPS (diluted) $8.35 $-4.97 $-5.24
Cash & equivalents $2.25B $192.03M $84.54M
Total debt $16.07B $2.62B –
Shares (diluted) 167.00M 48.02M 55.46M
Enterprise value $36.70B $17.18B $49.60M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricIQVCRLDNA
P/E 32.5x -75.7x -2.7x
P/FCF 21.8x 48.4x -4.6x
P/Operating cash flow 16.6x 30.8x -4.8x
P/S 2.6x 4.5x 7.3x
P/B 6.7x 6.3x 1.9x
P/Tangible book 22.1x 6.9x 2.2x
EV/EBITDA 17.0x 52.5x -3.1x
EV/EBIT 26.6x 225.9x -2.5x
EV/Revenue 3.4x 5.1x 6.5x
EV/FCF 28.4x 55.0x -4.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 21.5x 35.0x -4.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.82 2.09 0.03

Growth

14 metrics
MetricIQVCRLDNA
Revenue growth (1Y) 8.8% -0.7% -46.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.2% -1.5% -30.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 6.6% -0.1% -49.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 3.4% -5.5% -28.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 1.7% -27.6% 2.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 6.2% -48.2% 39.1%
Net income growth (1Y) 9.0% -268.7% 7.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 7.8% -35.5% 38.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 11.7% -253.8% 8.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 11.5% -36.2% -102.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -2.4% -26.1% 28.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 11.7% -2.3% 16.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -6.0% -35.9% 36.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 16.3% 8.6% 22.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricIQVCRLDNA
Gross margin 33.1% 32.7% 83.1%
EBITDA margin 20.0% 9.7% -211.6%
Operating margin 12.8% 2.3% -259.9%
Pretax margin 9.0% -4.6% -264.1%
Net margin 8.1% -6.0% -260.0%
FCF margin 12.0% 9.3% -156.3%
Operating cash flow margin 15.8% 14.6% -152.2%
Return on equity 21.4% -8.2% -67.4%
Return on assets 4.6% -3.1% -28.7%
Return on invested capital 8.2% 1.6% –
Return on capital employed 9.9% 1.4% -31.0%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.5x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.0x -2.4x 0.6x
Stock comp / revenue 1.8% 2.1% 61.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricIQVCRLDNA
Debt / assets 52.7% 34.8% –
Debt / equity 2.4x 0.9x –
Net debt / EBITDA 3.9x 6.3x –
Debt / FCF 7.7x 7.1x –
Liabilities / assets 77.7% 62.2% 57.5%
Equity / assets 22.3% 37.8% 42.5%
Interest coverage 2.8x 0.8x –
Current ratio 0.8x 1.3x 4.6x
Quick ratio 1.0x 0.8x 1.4x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.2x 1.2x
Altman Z-score 2.29 3.18 -8.57

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricIQVCRLDNA
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 2.6% 1.8% –
Shareholder yield 2.6% 1.8% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusIQVCRLDNA
Forward P/E 22.6xFY2026 34.5xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $12.14FY2026 $10.90FY2026 $-4.06FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +1.8%FY2026 +6.0%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +13.3% +20.5% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $18.58BFY2026 $3.82BFY2026 $88.21MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +13.9%FY2026 -4.9%FY2026 -48.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -3.5% +0.7% +5.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersIQVCRLDNA
Held by institutions 94.1% 100.0% 55.2%
Institutions holding 1,084 571 183
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.3% -0.7% +12.3%
Institutions buying 531 271 100
Institutions selling 424 204 39
Buyers to sellers 1.25 1.33 2.56

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

IQVCRLDNA
IQV 1.00 0.71 0.21
CRL 0.71 1.00 0.35
DNA 0.21 0.35 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, IQV, CRL and DNA?

Iqvia Holdings (IQV) is the largest by market capitalisation: Iqvia Holdings (IQV) $45.31B, Charles River Laboratories International (CRL) $17.94B, Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings (DNA) $811.68M.

Which company is growing faster?

Iqvia Holdings (IQV) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Iqvia Holdings (IQV) +8.8%, Charles River Laboratories International (CRL) -0.7%, Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings (DNA) -46.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Iqvia Holdings (IQV) has the highest net margin (Iqvia Holdings (IQV) 8.1%, Charles River Laboratories International (CRL) -6.0%, Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings (DNA) -260.0%). On return on invested capital, Iqvia Holdings (IQV) leads (Iqvia Holdings (IQV) 8.2%, Charles River Laboratories International (CRL) 1.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Charles River Laboratories International (CRL) returned the most: Iqvia Holdings (IQV) +26.2%, Charles River Laboratories International (CRL) +108.6%, Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings (DNA) +4.5%. Over five years, Iqvia Holdings (IQV) compounded fastest (Iqvia Holdings (IQV) +1.0%/yr, Charles River Laboratories International (CRL) -3.5%/yr, Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings (DNA) -53.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Iqvia Holdings (IQV) has been the steadiest (Iqvia Holdings (IQV) 40.4%, Charles River Laboratories International (CRL) 45.7%, Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings (DNA) 102.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, IQV, CRL and DNA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Iqvia Holdings (IQV) leads on 9. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.