IOTR vs KHOBF vs UI Stock Comparison

iOThree, Kheoba and Ubiquiti Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
IOTR iOThree Ltd
$2.07 +4.0% 1M -36.1% 1Y
Market cap
$5.55M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Networking Equipment Technology
KHOBF KHEOBA Ltd
$2.50 0.0% 1M 0.0% 1Y
Market cap
$20.23M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
ERP Software Technology
2 wins
UI Ubiquiti Inc.
$585.48 +4.3% 1M -20.4% 1Y
Market cap
$36.33B
P/E
37.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.27B
Div. yield
–
Networking Equipment Technology
1 win

Head to Head

3 decided of 12

Kheoba leads on 2 of the 12 questions below (Kheoba 2, Ubiquiti 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionIOTRKHOBFUILeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.55M $20.23M $36.33B UI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -4.7x — 37.8x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 31.0x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — — +27.2% –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — — 29.3% –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 72.8% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -36.1% 0.0% -20.4% KHOBF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — — +14.4%/yr –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 146.4% 0.0% 53.8% KHOBF
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — — 68/100 –

Percentile Scorecard

IOTRKHOBFUI

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisIOTRKHOBFUI
Valuation 55 #51 of 111 – 27 #81 of 111
Growth – – 90 #12 of 108
Profitability – – 99 #2 of 104
Financial Health 49 #59 of 115 82 #20 of 109 75 #30 of 115
Shareholder Returns – – 50 #41 of 81
Overall – – 68
  • IOTR ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • KHOBF ranked among 115 companies in Business Applications
  • UI ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodIOTRKHOBFUISPY
1 month +4.0%0.0%+4.3% -0.8%
3 months -30.1%0.0%+8.4% +3.5%
6 months -24.5%0.0%-42.0% +7.0%
Year to date -15.2%0.0%+5.8% +12.2%
1 year -36.1%0.0%-20.4% +13.0%
3 years ——+401.8% +86.3%
3 years, per year ——+71.3% +23.1%
5 years ——+95.5% +68.6%
5 years, per year ——+14.4% +11.0%
10 years ——+1,006.8% +258.0%
10 years, per year ——+27.2% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureIOTRKHOBFUISPY
Volatility, 1Y 146.4%0.0%53.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 125.8%—59.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.420.001.64 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.25—-0.38 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -96.2%-37.5%-70.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -61.2%0.0%-46.0% -1.8%
52-week high $5.33$2.50$1,084.50 $779.14
52-week low $1.56$2.50$515.44 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleIOTRKHOBFUI
P/E now vs peer median -4.7xmedian 32.0x —median 28.8x 36.9xmedian 32.0x
P/S now vs peer median 0.3xmedian 2.8x —median 2.8x 10.8xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 19.4x —median 17.7x 28.9xmedian 19.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median -1.7xmedian 29.0x —median 15.8x 39.0xmedian 29.0x
P/B now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 2.9x 122.0xmedian 3.2x 24.6xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.13 —median 0.85 1.12median 1.13

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsIOTRKHOBFUI
Revenue – – $3.27B
Gross profit – – $1.51B
Operating income – – $1.19B
Net income – – $960.30M
Free cash flow – – $908.94M
R&D – – $204.17M
EPS (diluted) – – $15.85
Cash & equivalents $2.12M $318.16K $522.58M
Total debt $376.70K – $180.81M
Shares (diluted) 2.64M 8.09M 60.57M
Enterprise value $1.15M $19.91M $34.87B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricIOTRKHOBFUI
P/E -4.7x – 36.9x
P/FCF -1.7x – 39.0x
P/Operating cash flow – – 38.2x
P/S 0.3x – 10.8x
P/B 1.1x 122.0x 24.6x
P/Tangible book 1.2x 125.8x 24.6x
EV/EBITDA – – 28.9x
EV/EBIT – – 29.4x
EV/Revenue – – 10.6x
EV/FCF – – 38.3x
EV/Operating cash flow – – 37.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – 1.12

Growth

14 metrics
MetricIOTRKHOBFUI
Revenue growth (1Y) – – 27.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – 19.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 35.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 25.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) – – 41.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – 29.6%
Net income growth (1Y) – – 34.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – 33.1%
EPS growth (1Y) – – 34.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – 33.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – 45.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 103.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – 44.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 95.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricIOTRKHOBFUI
Gross margin – – 46.2%
EBITDA margin – – 36.8%
Operating margin – – 36.2%
Pretax margin – – 36.1%
Net margin – – 29.3%
FCF margin – – 27.8%
Operating cash flow margin – – 28.4%
Return on equity – – 72.7%
Return on assets – – 49.1%
Return on invested capital – – 72.8%
Return on capital employed – – 89.1%
Asset turnover – – 1.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – 1.0x
Stock comp / revenue – – 0.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricIOTRKHOBFUI
Debt / assets 4.4% – –
Debt / equity 0.1x – –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 47.3% 49.8% 34.5%
Equity / assets 52.7% 50.2% 65.5%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 1.8x 2.0x 2.9x
Quick ratio 1.0x 2.0x 1.5x
Cash ratio 0.7x 1.9x 1.0x
Altman Z-score – – 32.88

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricIOTRKHOBFUI
Dividend yield – – 0.6%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – – 0.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusIOTRKHOBFUI
Forward P/E – – 31.0xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year – – $18.88FY2027
EPS growth, next FY – – +18.4%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after – – +9.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year – – $4.12BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY – – +25.9%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after – – +5.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersIOTRKHOBFUI
Held by institutions – – 4.9%
Institutions holding – – 354
Change in shares held, QoQ – – +8.0%
Institutions buying – – 163
Institutions selling – – 139
Buyers to sellers – – 1.17

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

IOTRKHOBFUI
IOTR 1.00 – 0.06
KHOBF – – –
UI 0.06 – 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, IOTR, KHOBF and UI?

Ubiquiti (UI) is the largest by market capitalisation: iOThree (IOTR) $5.55M, Kheoba (KHOBF) $20.23M, Ubiquiti (UI) $36.33B.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Kheoba (KHOBF) returned the most: iOThree (IOTR) -36.1%, Kheoba (KHOBF) 0.0%, Ubiquiti (UI) -20.4%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Kheoba (KHOBF) has been the steadiest (iOThree (IOTR) 146.4%, Kheoba (KHOBF) 0.0%, Ubiquiti (UI) 53.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, IOTR, KHOBF and UI?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Kheoba (KHOBF) leads on 2. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.