IOT vs VIA vs MANH Stock Comparison

Samsara, Via Transportation and Manhattan Associates Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
IOT Samsara Inc.
$44.91 +14.9% 1M +16.2% 1Y
Market cap
$26.10B
P/E
288.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.85B
Div. yield
–
Supply Chain Software Technology
2 wins
VIA Via Transportation, Inc.
$36.71 +24.3% 1M -24.8% 1Y
Market cap
$2.90B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$491.70M
Div. yield
–
Supply Chain Software Technology
MANH Manhattan Associates Inc
$238.19 +13.2% 1M +22.3% 1Y
Market cap
$13.89B
P/E
66.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.13B
Div. yield
–
Supply Chain Software Technology
6 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Manhattan Associates leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Manhattan Associates 6, Samsara 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionIOTVIAMANHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $26.10B $2.90B $13.89B IOT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 288.2x -29.4x 66.1x MANH
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 55.4x — 40.9x MANH
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +29.5% +29.1% +6.5% IOT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 4.9% -20.0% 18.7% MANH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +16.2% -24.8% +22.3% MANH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — — +7.2%/yr –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 59.6% 70.7% 46.6% MANH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 52/100 41/100 53/100 MANH

Percentile Scorecard

IOTVIAMANH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisIOTVIAMANH
Valuation 12 #79 of 90 20 #72 of 90 21 #71 of 90
Growth 99 #2 of 82 73 #23 of 82 48 #43 of 82
Profitability 58 #33 of 77 29 #55 of 77 96 #4 of 77
Financial Health 58 #41 of 96 85 #15 of 96 36 #62 of 96
Shareholder Returns 32 #37 of 54 0 #54 of 54 64 #20 of 54
Overall 52 41 53
  • IOT ranked among 99 companies in Vertical Software
  • VIA ranked among 99 companies in Vertical Software
  • MANH ranked among 99 companies in Vertical Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodIOTVIAMANHSPY
1 month +14.9%+24.3%+13.2% -1.0%
3 months +35.6%+107.6%+57.0% +2.9%
6 months +49.9%+134.9%+67.3% +6.4%
Year to date +26.7%+26.5%+37.4% +11.4%
1 year +16.2%-24.8%+22.3% +13.1%
3 years +89.7%—+25.6% +79.4%
3 years, per year +23.8%—+7.9% +21.5%
5 years ——+41.2% +67.7%
5 years, per year ——+7.2% +10.9%
10 years ——+357.6% +255.2%
10 years, per year ——+16.4% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureIOTVIAMANHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 59.6%70.7%46.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 55.5%79.8%46.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.831.150.27 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.27-0.350.48 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -70.4%-75.3%-61.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -0.7%-31.9%-1.6% -2.5%
52-week high $45.22$53.93$242.17 $779.14
52-week low $24.25$13.31$120.88 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleIOTVIAMANH
P/E now vs peer median 289.7xmedian 42.7x -30.3xmedian 42.7x 66.6xmedian 42.7x
P/S now vs peer median 14.2xmedian 2.7x 6.1xmedian 2.7x 12.3xmedian 2.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 517.3xmedian 19.0x -34.0xmedian 19.0x 48.8xmedian 19.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 102.9xmedian 19.6x -70.9xmedian 19.6x 34.8xmedian 19.6x
P/B now vs peer median 16.4xmedian 1.8x 4.8xmedian 1.8x 88.2xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median 8.84median 1.75 —median 1.75 4.41median 1.75

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsIOTVIAMANH
Revenue $1.85B $491.70M $1.13B
Gross profit $1.41B $195.70M $628.53M
Operating income $19.37M -$88.62M $274.01M
Net income $90.55M -$98.53M $210.23M
Free cash flow $255.48M -$42.19M $399.19M
R&D $375.86M $98.91M $147.00M
EPS (diluted) $0.15 $-1.21 $3.56
Cash & equivalents $291.39M $335.92M $186.11M
Shares (diluted) 590.46M 81.34M 59.00M
Enterprise value $22.87B $1.46B $12.89B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricIOTVIAMANH
P/E 289.7x -30.3x 66.6x
P/FCF 102.9x -70.9x 34.8x
P/Operating cash flow 91.2x -73.2x 33.5x
P/S 14.2x 6.1x 12.3x
P/B 16.4x 4.8x 88.2x
P/Tangible book 16.4x 5.1x 88.2x
EV/EBITDA 517.3x -34.0x 48.8x
EV/EBIT 1,314x -29.9x 50.0x
EV/Revenue 13.8x 5.4x 12.2x
EV/FCF 99.6x -62.9x 34.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 88.3x -65.0x 33.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 8.84 – 4.41

Growth

14 metrics
MetricIOTVIAMANH
Revenue growth (1Y) 29.5% 29.1% 6.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 33.3% – 9.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 28.7% 29.8% 5.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 35.7% – 11.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) 115.4% -25.0% 0.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 27.5% – 15.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 203.0% -26.7% -4.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 33.5% – 12.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 199.7% 80.0% -1.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 32.8% – 15.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 49.7% – 31.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 581.0% – 28.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 50.6% – 29.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 142.3% – 28.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricIOTVIAMANH
Gross margin 76.4% 39.8% 55.8%
EBITDA margin 2.7% -15.9% 24.9%
Operating margin 1.0% -18.0% 24.3%
Pretax margin 5.6% -19.7% 25.2%
Net margin 4.9% -20.0% 18.7%
FCF margin 13.8% -8.6% 35.4%
Operating cash flow margin 15.6% -8.3% 36.8%
Return on equity 5.8% -15.9% 115.9%
Return on assets 3.4% -13.7% 29.2%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed 1.1% -14.1% 112.1%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.7x 1.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 3.2x 0.4x 2.0x
Stock comp / revenue 17.9% 10.7% 10.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricIOTVIAMANH
Debt / assets – – –
Debt / equity – – –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 42.1% 13.9% 77.5%
Equity / assets 57.9% 86.1% 22.5%
Interest coverage – -29.3x –
Current ratio 1.6x 5.0x 1.0x
Quick ratio 1.2x 4.9x 0.9x
Cash ratio 0.9x 3.7x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 13.68 16.42 18.68

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricIOTVIAMANH
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -0.1% -12.7% 3.1%
Shareholder yield -0.1% -12.7% 3.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusIOTVIAMANH
Forward P/E 55.4xFY2026 – 40.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.81FY2026 $-0.04FY2026 $5.83FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +44.6%FY2026 – +15.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +23.5% – +11.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.93BFY2026 $564.79MFY2026 $1.09BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +19.3%FY2026 +30.0%FY2026 +0.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +30.8% +25.9% +12.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersIOTVIAMANH
Held by institutions 67.7% 59.3% 100.0%
Institutions holding 549 128 506
Change in shares held, QoQ +9.1% +19.9% -0.7%
Institutions buying 318 90 248
Institutions selling 165 20 198
Buyers to sellers 1.93 4.50 1.25

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

IOTVIAMANH
IOT 1.00 0.43 0.64
VIA 0.43 1.00 0.41
MANH 0.64 0.41 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, IOT, VIA and MANH?

Samsara (IOT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Samsara (IOT) $26.10B, Via Transportation (VIA) $2.90B, Manhattan Associates (MANH) $13.89B.

Which stock is cheaper, IOT, VIA and MANH?

Manhattan Associates (MANH) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Samsara (IOT) 288.2x, Via Transportation (VIA) -29.4x, Manhattan Associates (MANH) 66.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Manhattan Associates (MANH) is cheapest (Samsara (IOT) 55.4x, Manhattan Associates (MANH) 40.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Samsara (IOT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Samsara (IOT) +29.5%, Via Transportation (VIA) +29.1%, Manhattan Associates (MANH) +6.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Manhattan Associates (MANH) has the highest net margin (Samsara (IOT) 4.9%, Via Transportation (VIA) -20.0%, Manhattan Associates (MANH) 18.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Manhattan Associates (MANH) returned the most: Samsara (IOT) +16.2%, Via Transportation (VIA) -24.8%, Manhattan Associates (MANH) +22.3%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Manhattan Associates (MANH) has been the steadiest (Samsara (IOT) 59.6%, Via Transportation (VIA) 70.7%, Manhattan Associates (MANH) 46.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, IOT, VIA and MANH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Manhattan Associates (MANH) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.