INTG vs TPL vs MAYS Stock Comparison

Intergroup, Texas Pacific Land and Mays J W Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
INTG Intergroup Corp
$34.95 +5.1% 1M -8.7% 1Y
Market cap
$81.29M
P/E
49.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$73.95M
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Operators Real Estate
2 wins
TPL Texas Pacific Land Corp
$330.40 -3.2% 1M +6.6% 1Y
Market cap
$22.93B
P/E
42.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$897.54M
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Operators Real Estate
6 wins
MAYS Mays J W Inc
$45.00 +13.8% 1M +17.7% 1Y
Market cap
$90.71M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$21.43M
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Operators Real Estate
2 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Texas Pacific Land leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Texas Pacific Land 6, Intergroup 2, Mays J W 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionINTGTPLMAYSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $81.29M $22.93B $90.71M TPL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 49.5x 42.3x -78.8x TPL
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 33.7x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +14.9% +20.8% -3.9% TPL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.2% 60.3% -5.4% TPL
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 33.0% -2.1% TPL
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.2x — 3.4x INTG
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -8.7% +6.6% +17.7% MAYS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -5.6%/yr +18.7%/yr +4.9%/yr TPL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 68.3% 49.0% 34.5% MAYS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 65/100 59/100 39/100 INTG

Percentile Scorecard

INTGTPLMAYS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisINTGTPLMAYS
Valuation 87 #6 of 39 21 #31 of 39 32 #27 of 39
Growth 81 #7 of 32 39 #20 of 32 19 #26 of 32
Profitability 68 #10 of 29 100 #1 of 29 46 #16 of 29
Financial Health 43 #22 of 38 97 #2 of 38 60 #16 of 38
Shareholder Returns 46 #8 of 14 39 #9 of 14 –
Overall 65 59 39
  • INTG ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • TPL ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • MAYS ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodINTGTPLMAYSSPY
1 month +5.1%-3.2%+13.8% -0.2%
3 months +23.2%-15.1%+15.2% +3.9%
6 months -17.8%-23.3%+11.2% +8.2%
Year to date +23.1%+15.0%+12.7% +12.9%
1 year -8.7%+6.6%+17.7% +12.3%
3 years +24.8%+63.4%-5.5% +87.4%
3 years, per year +7.7%+17.8%-1.9% +23.3%
5 years -24.8%+135.5%+26.8% +67.9%
5 years, per year -5.6%+18.7%+4.9% +10.9%
10 years +52.6%+1,043.7%-2.4% +261.1%
10 years, per year +4.3%+27.6%-0.2% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureINTGTPLMAYSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 68.3%49.0%34.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 69.5%50.3%50.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.010.400.48 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.130.140.51 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -82.9%-52.8%-37.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -28.6%-38.8%-18.2% -1.2%
52-week high $48.92$539.79$55.00 $779.14
52-week low $25.10$273.56$37.55 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleINTGTPLMAYS
P/E now vs peer median 45.7xmedian 7.9x 42.1xmedian 7.9x -78.8xmedian 7.9x
P/S now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 4.7x 25.4xmedian 4.7x 4.2xmedian 4.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 3.5xmedian 11.2x 30.5xmedian 11.2x 106.6xmedian 11.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 264.4xmedian 6.2x -347.3xmedian 6.2x -30.2xmedian 6.2x
P/B now vs peer median -0.7xmedian 0.6x 13.6xmedian 0.6x 1.8xmedian 0.6x
PEG now vs peer median 1.49median 0.32 4.56median 0.32 0.14median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsINTGTPLMAYS
Revenue $73.95M $897.54M $21.43M
Gross profit $30.68M – –
Operating income $11.87M $672.48M -$1.66M
Net income $336.00K $541.42M $21.32M
Free cash flow $284.00K -$65.61M -$3.01M
EPS (diluted) $0.71 $7.84 $-0.57
Cash & equivalents $6.36M $248.61M $3.14M
Total debt $6.50M – $6.13M
Shares (diluted) 2.31M 69.03M 2.02M
Enterprise value $51.04M $21.75B $81.11M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricINTGTPLMAYS
P/E 45.7x 42.1x -78.8x
P/FCF 264.4x -347.3x -30.2x
P/Operating cash flow 21.8x 37.8x 50.2x
P/S 1.0x 25.4x 4.2x
P/B -0.7x 13.6x 1.8x
P/Tangible book -0.7x 13.9x 1.8x
EV/EBITDA 3.5x 30.5x 106.6x
EV/EBIT 5.9x 33.5x -56.5x
EV/Revenue 0.9x 25.1x 4.4x
EV/FCF 247.0x -343.6x -31.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 20.3x 37.4x 51.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.49 4.56 0.14

Growth

14 metrics
MetricINTGTPLMAYS
Revenue growth (1Y) 14.9% 20.8% -3.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 8.7% 11.3% -1.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 14.7% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 9.8% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 55.3% 19.3% -1,551%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 39.9% 9.5% -98.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 104.5% 17.3% 28,402%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 26.7% 9.1% 1,700%
EPS growth (1Y) 128.6% 17.3% -1,429%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 30.7% 9.2% -580.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -41.5% 15.4% -6.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 224.7% 10.2% -8.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -85.1% -176.9% -1,306%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 26.7% -29.3% -68.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricINTGTPLMAYS
Gross margin 41.5% – –
EBITDA margin 26.8% 82.5% 4.1%
Operating margin 16.0% 74.9% -7.7%
Pretax margin 3.5% 76.2% -7.6%
Net margin 2.2% 60.3% -5.4%
FCF margin 0.4% -7.3% -14.0%
Operating cash flow margin 4.7% 67.2% 8.4%
Return on equity – 33.5% -2.2%
Return on assets 0.3% 30.0% -1.3%
Return on invested capital – 33.0% -2.1%
Return on capital employed – 39.3% –
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.5x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 10.3x 1.1x 0.1x
Stock comp / revenue 0.1% 1.9% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricINTGTPLMAYS
Debt / assets 1.4% – 6.8%
Debt / equity 0.0x – 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.2x – 3.4x
Debt / FCF 5.0x – -2.0x
Liabilities / assets 209.0% 10.1% 42.7%
Equity / assets -109.0% 89.9% 57.3%
Interest coverage 0.9x 342.2x -8.0x
Current ratio – 4.6x –
Quick ratio – 4.5x –
Cash ratio – 2.6x –
Altman Z-score – 76.33 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricINTGTPLMAYS
Dividend yield – 0.7% –
Net buyback yield 0.1% 0.0% –
Shareholder yield 0.1% 0.7% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusINTGTPLMAYS
Forward P/E – 33.7xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year – $9.79FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY – +40.5%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – -1.3% –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $976.77MFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY – +22.4%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after – +25.8% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersINTGTPLMAYS
Held by institutions – 72.9% 3.6%
Institutions holding – 868 10
Change in shares held, QoQ – +0.5% -7.1%
Institutions buying – 440 2
Institutions selling – 276 1
Buyers to sellers – 1.59 2.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

INTGTPLMAYS
INTG 1.00 0.10 0.00
TPL 0.10 1.00 0.08
MAYS 0.00 0.08 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, INTG, TPL and MAYS?

Texas Pacific Land (TPL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Intergroup (INTG) $81.29M, Texas Pacific Land (TPL) $22.93B, Mays J W (MAYS) $90.71M.

Which stock is cheaper, INTG, TPL and MAYS?

Texas Pacific Land (TPL) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Intergroup (INTG) 49.5x, Texas Pacific Land (TPL) 42.3x, Mays J W (MAYS) -78.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Texas Pacific Land (TPL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Intergroup (INTG) +14.9%, Texas Pacific Land (TPL) +20.8%, Mays J W (MAYS) -3.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Texas Pacific Land (TPL) has the highest net margin (Intergroup (INTG) 2.2%, Texas Pacific Land (TPL) 60.3%, Mays J W (MAYS) -5.4%). On return on invested capital, Texas Pacific Land (TPL) leads (Texas Pacific Land (TPL) 33.0%, Mays J W (MAYS) -2.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Mays J W (MAYS) returned the most: Intergroup (INTG) -8.7%, Texas Pacific Land (TPL) +6.6%, Mays J W (MAYS) +17.7%. Over five years, Texas Pacific Land (TPL) compounded fastest (Intergroup (INTG) -5.6%/yr, Texas Pacific Land (TPL) +18.7%/yr, Mays J W (MAYS) +4.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Mays J W (MAYS) has been the steadiest (Intergroup (INTG) 68.3%, Texas Pacific Land (TPL) 49.0%, Mays J W (MAYS) 34.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, INTG, TPL and MAYS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Texas Pacific Land (TPL) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.