INTG vs FRPH vs OZ Stock Comparison

Intergroup, Frp Holdings and Belpointe PREP Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
INTG Intergroup Corp
$33.07 -0.5% 1M -19.2% 1Y
Market cap
$74.75M
P/E
45.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$73.95M
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Operators Real Estate
6 wins
FRPH Frp Holdings, Inc.
$18.96 -10.2% 1M -24.1% 1Y
Market cap
$355.19M
P/E
261.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$43.62M
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Operators Real Estate
3 wins
OZ Belpointe PREP, LLC
$35.58 -19.7% 1M -44.0% 1Y
Market cap
$135.40M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Operators Real Estate

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Intergroup leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Intergroup 6, Frp Holdings 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionINTGFRPHOZLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $74.75M $355.19M $135.40M FRPH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 45.5x 261.0x — INTG
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +14.9% +3.1% — INTG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.2% 3.1% — FRPH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 0.9% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.2x 6.4x — INTG
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -19.2% -24.1% -44.0% INTG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -6.6%/yr -7.6%/yr -18.7%/yr INTG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 68.3% 25.8% 32.6% FRPH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 65/100 30/100 — INTG

Percentile Scorecard

INTGFRPHOZ

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisINTGFRPHOZ
Valuation 90 #5 of 39 24 #30 of 39 –
Growth 78 #8 of 33 13 #29 of 33 –
Profitability 69 #10 of 30 48 #16 of 30 –
Financial Health 41 #23 of 38 35 #25 of 38 –
Shareholder Returns 46 #8 of 14 – –
Overall 65 30 –
  • INTG ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • FRPH ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • OZ ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodINTGFRPHOZSPY
1 month -0.5%-10.2%-19.7% -0.8%
3 months +3.0%-19.5%-21.2% +3.5%
6 months -16.1%-11.6%-28.9% +7.0%
Year to date +16.5%-16.8%-45.3% +12.2%
1 year -19.2%-24.1%-44.0% +13.0%
3 years +18.1%-29.8%-48.4% +86.3%
3 years, per year +5.7%-11.1%-19.8% +23.1%
5 years -28.9%-32.8%-64.4% +68.6%
5 years, per year -6.6%-7.6%-18.7% +11.0%
10 years +50.3%+18.9%— +258.0%
10 years, per year +4.2%+1.7%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureINTGFRPHOZSPY
Volatility, 1Y 68.3%25.8%32.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 69.5%26.7%38.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.000.260.26 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.28-0.93-1.35 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -82.9%-42.2%-65.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -32.4%-25.8%-47.7% -1.8%
52-week high $48.92$25.56$67.99 $779.14
52-week low $25.10$18.77$35.58 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleINTGFRPHOZ
P/E now vs peer median 43.3xmedian 7.8x 265.2xmedian 7.8x —median 7.8x
P/S now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 4.9x 8.3xmedian 4.9x —median 4.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 3.3xmedian 11.2x 26.9xmedian 11.2x —median 11.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 250.2xmedian 6.4x —median 6.4x —median 6.4x
P/B now vs peer median -0.6xmedian 0.6x 0.8xmedian 0.6x —median 0.6x
PEG now vs peer median 1.41median 0.33 -8.16median 0.33 —median 0.33

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsINTGFRPHOZ
Revenue $73.95M $43.62M –
Gross profit $30.68M – –
Operating income $11.87M $6.16M –
Net income $336.00K $1.32M –
Free cash flow $284.00K – –
EPS (diluted) $0.71 $0.07 –
Cash & equivalents $6.36M $100.98M –
Total debt $6.50M $214.62M –
Shares (diluted) 2.31M 19.06M 3.90M
Enterprise value $44.50M -$140.43M $135.40M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricINTGFRPHOZ
P/E 43.3x 265.2x –
P/FCF 250.2x – –
P/Operating cash flow 20.6x – –
P/S 1.0x 8.3x –
P/B -0.6x 0.8x –
P/Tangible book -0.6x 0.8x –
EV/EBITDA 3.3x 26.9x –
EV/EBIT 5.6x 77.5x –
EV/Revenue 0.9x 10.9x –
EV/FCF 232.8x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 19.2x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.41 -8.16 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricINTGFRPHOZ
Revenue growth (1Y) 14.9% 3.1% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 8.7% 3.0% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 14.7% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 9.8% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 55.3% -38.3% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 39.9% -15.4% –
Net income growth (1Y) 104.5% -75.5% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 26.7% -33.9% –
EPS growth (1Y) 128.6% -74.5% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 30.7% -32.5% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -41.5% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 224.7% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -85.1% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 26.7% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricINTGFRPHOZ
Gross margin 41.5% – –
EBITDA margin 26.8% 40.7% –
Operating margin 16.0% 14.1% –
Pretax margin 3.5% 24.5% –
Net margin 2.2% 3.1% –
FCF margin 0.4% – –
Operating cash flow margin 4.7% – –
Return on equity – 0.2% –
Return on assets 0.3% 0.1% –
Return on invested capital – 0.9% –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.1x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 10.3x – –
Stock comp / revenue 0.1% 6.3% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricINTGFRPHOZ
Debt / assets 1.4% 28.2% –
Debt / equity 0.0x 0.5x –
Net debt / EBITDA -0.2x 6.4x –
Debt / FCF 5.0x – –
Liabilities / assets 209.0% 40.3% –
Equity / assets -109.0% 59.7% –
Interest coverage 0.9x 2.1x –
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricINTGFRPHOZ
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 0.1% – –
Shareholder yield 0.1% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusINTGFRPHOZ

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersINTGFRPHOZ
Held by institutions – 47.8% 31.8%
Institutions holding – 109 45
Change in shares held, QoQ – +3.0% -6.0%
Institutions buying – 56 8
Institutions selling – 30 13
Buyers to sellers – 1.87 0.62

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

INTGFRPHOZ
INTG 1.00 0.03 0.11
FRPH 0.03 1.00 0.00
OZ 0.11 0.00 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, INTG, FRPH and OZ?

Frp Holdings (FRPH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Intergroup (INTG) $74.75M, Frp Holdings (FRPH) $355.19M, Belpointe PREP (OZ) $135.40M.

Which stock is cheaper, INTG, FRPH and OZ?

Intergroup (INTG) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Intergroup (INTG) 45.5x, Frp Holdings (FRPH) 261.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Intergroup (INTG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Intergroup (INTG) +14.9%, Frp Holdings (FRPH) +3.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Frp Holdings (FRPH) has the highest net margin (Intergroup (INTG) 2.2%, Frp Holdings (FRPH) 3.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Intergroup (INTG) returned the most: Intergroup (INTG) -19.2%, Frp Holdings (FRPH) -24.1%, Belpointe PREP (OZ) -44.0%. Over five years, Intergroup (INTG) compounded fastest (Intergroup (INTG) -6.6%/yr, Frp Holdings (FRPH) -7.6%/yr, Belpointe PREP (OZ) -18.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Frp Holdings (FRPH) has been the steadiest (Intergroup (INTG) 68.3%, Frp Holdings (FRPH) 25.8%, Belpointe PREP (OZ) 32.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, INTG, FRPH and OZ?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Intergroup (INTG) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.