INTA vs CRM vs BLKB Stock Comparison

Intapp, Salesforce and Blackbaud Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
INTA Intapp, Inc.
$47.99 +31.6% 1M +21.4% 1Y
Market cap
$3.76B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$577.81M
Div. yield
–
CRM and Sales Software Technology
3 wins
CRM Salesforce, Inc.
$248.53 +4.6% 1M -2.6% 1Y
Market cap
$203.08B
P/E
21.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$43.94B
Div. yield
–
CRM and Sales Software Technology
4 wins
BLKB Blackbaud Inc
$55.54 +29.5% 1M -14.2% 1Y
Market cap
$2.47B
P/E
16.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.15B
Div. yield
–
CRM and Sales Software Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Salesforce leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Salesforce 4, Blackbaud 4, Intapp 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionINTACRMBLKBLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.76B $203.08B $2.47B CRM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -90.9x 21.0x 16.4x BLKB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 30.8x 14.1x 11.2x BLKB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +14.6% +11.2% +0.7% INTA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -7.1% 22.0% 13.1% CRM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 9.0% 16.4% BLKB
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.9x 3.6x CRM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +21.4% -2.6% -14.2% INTA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +12.5%/yr -3.2%/yr -5.5%/yr INTA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 60.1% 46.7% 49.3% CRM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 53/100 70/100 71/100 BLKB

Percentile Scorecard

INTACRMBLKB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisINTACRMBLKB
Valuation 35 #66 of 101 75 #26 of 101 92 #9 of 101
Growth 59 #40 of 97 73 #27 of 97 77 #23 of 97
Profitability 48 #49 of 94 88 #12 of 94 85 #15 of 94
Financial Health 48 #57 of 109 44 #61 of 109 16 #92 of 109
Shareholder Returns 75 #17 of 64 70 #20 of 64 84 #11 of 64
Overall 53 70 71
  • INTA ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications
  • CRM ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications
  • BLKB ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodINTACRMBLKBSPY
1 month +31.6%+4.6%+29.5% -1.0%
3 months +74.7%+51.9%+69.8% +2.9%
6 months +115.7%+39.5%+48.1% +6.4%
Year to date +4.7%-6.2%-12.3% +11.4%
1 year +21.4%-2.6%-14.2% +13.1%
3 years +32.9%+21.7%-18.3% +79.4%
3 years, per year +10.0%+6.8%-6.5% +21.5%
5 years +80.1%-15.0%-24.5% +67.7%
5 years, per year +12.5%-3.2%-5.5% +10.9%
10 years —+235.9%-13.3% +255.2%
10 years, per year —+12.9%-1.4% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureINTACRMBLKBSPY
Volatility, 1Y 60.1%46.7%49.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 57.3%41.6%51.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.360.400.27 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.36-0.05-0.29 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -74.2%-59.2%-69.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-6.6%-18.3% -2.5%
52-week high $47.99$266.23$67.95 $779.14
52-week low $19.14$150.12$26.54 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleINTACRMBLKB
P/E now vs peer median -92.5xmedian 29.9x 21.1xmedian 29.9x 16.5xmedian 29.9x
P/S now vs peer median 6.4xmedian 2.8x 4.7xmedian 2.8x 2.2xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -157.1xmedian 17.4x 15.6xmedian 17.4x 11.6xmedian 17.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 25.4xmedian 16.9x 13.5xmedian 16.9x 7.7xmedian 16.9x
P/B now vs peer median 11.6xmedian 3.1x 5.3xmedian 3.1x 37.7xmedian 3.1x
PEG now vs peer median -4.27median 0.86 0.22median 0.86 0.20median 0.86

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsINTACRMBLKB
Revenue $577.81M $43.94B $1.15B
Gross profit $437.85M $33.96B $684.50M
Operating income -$40.10M $8.74B $227.18M
Net income -$41.31M $9.66B $150.68M
Free cash flow $144.71M $15.15B $329.16M
R&D $167.32M $6.37B $142.75M
EPS (diluted) $-0.52 $11.77 $3.36
Cash & equivalents $162.81M $8.31B $34.39M
Total debt – $39.29B $4.56B
Shares (diluted) 79.62M 821.00M 44.88M
Enterprise value $2.98B $158.96B $2.32B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricINTACRMBLKB
P/E -92.5x 21.1x 16.5x
P/FCF 25.4x 13.5x 7.7x
P/Operating cash flow 25.0x 13.0x 7.4x
P/S 6.4x 4.7x 2.2x
P/B 11.6x 5.3x 37.7x
P/Tangible book 12.7x 6.3x -95.9x
EV/EBITDA -157.1x 15.6x 11.6x
EV/EBIT -87.5x 26.6x 16.0x
EV/Revenue 6.1x 5.3x 3.2x
EV/FCF 24.2x 15.3x 11.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 23.9x 14.8x 10.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -4.27 0.22 0.20

Growth

14 metrics
MetricINTACRMBLKB
Revenue growth (1Y) 14.6% 11.2% 0.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 18.1% 9.9% 2.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 17.4% 10.7% 6.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 22.3% 11.3% 6.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) -46.6% 9.4% 191.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 16.7% 47.8% 108.4%
Net income growth (1Y) -126.8% 45.0% 150.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 15.9% 82.9% 75.6%
EPS growth (1Y) -124.2% 69.9% 154.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 21.7% 94.5% 82.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 18.9% 19.6% 38.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 74.8% 23.3% 19.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 18.8% 21.3% 35.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 78.9% 26.1% 20.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricINTACRMBLKB
Gross margin 75.8% 77.3% 59.6%
EBITDA margin -3.9% 34.0% 27.3%
Operating margin -6.9% 19.9% 19.8%
Pretax margin -6.4% 28.2% 14.9%
Net margin -7.1% 22.0% 13.1%
FCF margin 25.0% 34.5% 28.7%
Operating cash flow margin 25.4% 35.8% 29.6%
Return on equity -13.0% 26.7% 296.7%
Return on assets -5.6% 8.9% 6.4%
Return on invested capital – 9.0% 16.4%
Return on capital employed -12.3% 10.7% 22.7%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.4x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -3.6x 1.6x 2.3x
Stock comp / revenue 20.8% 8.3% 7.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricINTACRMBLKB
Debt / assets – 35.8% 44.3%
Debt / equity – 1.0x 17.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.9x 3.6x
Debt / FCF – 2.6x 3.5x
Liabilities / assets 57.9% 65.0% 97.4%
Equity / assets 42.1% 35.0% 2.6%
Interest coverage – 9.4x 3.4x
Current ratio 0.8x 0.8x 0.8x
Quick ratio 0.7x 0.7x 0.1x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.4x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 3.97 2.69 1.27

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricINTACRMBLKB
Dividend yield – 0.7% –
Net buyback yield 7.1% 16.7% 8.9%
Shareholder yield 7.1% 17.4% 8.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusINTACRMBLKB
Forward P/E 30.8xFY2027 14.1xFY2026 11.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.56FY2027 $17.65FY2026 $4.94FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +22.8%FY2027 +41.0%FY2026 +11.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +18.6% -5.3% +15.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $679.07MFY2027 $43.90BFY2026 $1.14BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +17.5%FY2027 +5.7%FY2026 +1.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +8.8% +11.7% +0.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersINTACRMBLKB
Held by institutions 85.1% 80.7% 100.0%
Institutions holding 248 2,471 281
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.1% -4.8% +9.3%
Institutions buying 129 1,003 174
Institutions selling 90 1,270 76
Buyers to sellers 1.43 0.79 2.29

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

INTACRMBLKB
INTA 1.00 0.63 0.59
CRM 0.63 1.00 0.62
BLKB 0.59 0.62 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, INTA, CRM and BLKB?

Salesforce (CRM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Intapp (INTA) $3.76B, Salesforce (CRM) $203.08B, Blackbaud (BLKB) $2.47B.

Which stock is cheaper, INTA, CRM and BLKB?

Blackbaud (BLKB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Intapp (INTA) -90.9x, Salesforce (CRM) 21.0x, Blackbaud (BLKB) 16.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Blackbaud (BLKB) is cheapest (Intapp (INTA) 30.8x, Salesforce (CRM) 14.1x, Blackbaud (BLKB) 11.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Intapp (INTA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Intapp (INTA) +14.6%, Salesforce (CRM) +11.2%, Blackbaud (BLKB) +0.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Salesforce (CRM) has the highest net margin (Intapp (INTA) -7.1%, Salesforce (CRM) 22.0%, Blackbaud (BLKB) 13.1%). On return on invested capital, Blackbaud (BLKB) leads (Salesforce (CRM) 9.0%, Blackbaud (BLKB) 16.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Intapp (INTA) returned the most: Intapp (INTA) +21.4%, Salesforce (CRM) -2.6%, Blackbaud (BLKB) -14.2%. Over five years, Intapp (INTA) compounded fastest (Intapp (INTA) +12.5%/yr, Salesforce (CRM) -3.2%/yr, Blackbaud (BLKB) -5.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Salesforce (CRM) has been the steadiest (Intapp (INTA) 60.1%, Salesforce (CRM) 46.7%, Blackbaud (BLKB) 49.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, INTA, CRM and BLKB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Salesforce (CRM) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.