INN vs OMAB vs PK Stock Comparison

Summit Hotel Properties, Central North Airport and Park Hotels & Resorts Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Summit Hotel Properties leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Summit Hotel Properties 5, Central North Airport 3, Park Hotels & Resorts 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionINNOMABPKLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $776.55M $4.74B $3.35B OMAB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -71.7x 16.0x -20.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 14.9x 33.9x OMAB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +1.2% — -1.4% INN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -1.4% — -6.4% INN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 2.2% — 0.7% INN
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 6.0x — 10.9x INN
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 4.44% 5.51% 6.01% PK
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +36.6% -4.2% +50.4% PK
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -6.4%/yr +15.2%/yr -2.1%/yr OMAB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 36.0% 31.1% 30.6% PK
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 54/100 46/100 41/100 INN

Percentile Scorecard

INNOMABPK

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisINNOMABPK
Valuation 96 #7 of 145 30 #96 of 136 68 #47 of 145
Growth 25 #107 of 142 – 3 #138 of 142
Profitability 37 #86 of 135 – 24 #103 of 135
Financial Health 38 #85 of 136 35 #94 of 143 27 #99 of 136
Shareholder Returns 75 #33 of 131 75 #21 of 81 82 #24 of 131
Overall 54 46 41
  • INN ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • OMAB ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • PK ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodINNOMABPKSPY
1 month +23.7%-3.6%+5.8% +0.9%
3 months +2.0%-7.6%+8.6% +5.9%
6 months +44.3%-7.4%+46.6% +8.5%
Year to date +47.8%-9.7%+59.0% +13.3%
1 year +36.6%-4.2%+50.4% +12.4%
3 years +34.1%+73.1%+49.6% +88.1%
3 years, per year +10.3%+20.1%+14.4% +23.5%
5 years -28.0%+103.0%-10.3% +68.2%
5 years, per year -6.4%+15.2%-2.1% +11.0%
10 years -43.3%+108.9%— +263.4%
10 years, per year -5.5%+7.6%— +13.8%

Risk

MeasureINNOMABPKSPY
Volatility, 1Y 36.0%31.1%30.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 35.0%28.0%27.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.771.120.77 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.02-0.141.65 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -64.5%-42.1%-58.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-27.2%-2.1% -0.9%
52-week high $7.20$134.98$16.99 $779.14
52-week low $4.03$88.75$9.84 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleINNOMABPK
P/E now vs peer median -71.7xmedian 25.8x 16.0xmedian 16.1x -20.4xmedian 25.8x
P/S now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 4.0x 5.3xmedian 0.9x 1.3xmedian 4.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 9.5xmedian 14.2x —median 8.6x 20.8xmedian 14.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 8.5xmedian 23.0x 11.7xmedian 11.6x 41.3xmedian 23.0x
P/B now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 1.3x 7.5xmedian 1.2x 1.1xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median -4.56median 1.91 —median 0.80 0.38median 1.91

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsINNOMABPK
Revenue $736.15M – $2.54B
Gross profit $316.02M – $756.00M
Operating income $66.19M – $52.00M
Net income -$10.52M – -$159.00M
Free cash flow $91.84M – $81.00M
EPS (diluted) $-0.10 – $-0.82
Cash & equivalents $36.93M $172.32M $264.00M
Total debt $1.37B $746.90M $3.92B
Shares (diluted) 106.18M – 200.00M
Enterprise value $969.69M $4.23B $2.36B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricINNOMABPK
P/E -71.7x 16.0x -20.4x
P/FCF 8.5x 11.7x 41.3x
P/Operating cash flow 4.9x – 8.3x
P/S 1.1x 5.3x 1.3x
P/B 0.7x 7.5x 1.1x
P/Tangible book 0.7x -9.6x 1.1x
EV/EBITDA 9.5x – 20.8x
EV/EBIT 31.9x – 134.6x
EV/Revenue 2.9x – 2.8x
EV/FCF 23.0x – 86.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 13.4x – 17.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -4.56 – 0.38

Growth

14 metrics
MetricINNOMABPK
Revenue growth (1Y) 1.2% – -1.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 0.4% – -1.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -1.6% – 1.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -1.1% – -0.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) -0.2% – -79.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 0.3% – -31.0%
Net income growth (1Y) -52,675% – -333.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 9.5% – -61.1%
EPS growth (1Y) -53,394% – -379.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 15.7% – -54.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -2.9% – -2.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -0.8% – -4.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 592.1% – -56.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 14.0% – -29.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricINNOMABPK
Gross margin 42.9% – 29.8%
EBITDA margin 30.1% – 13.2%
Operating margin 9.0% – 2.0%
Pretax margin -1.6% – -5.7%
Net margin -1.4% – -6.4%
FCF margin 12.5% – 3.2%
Operating cash flow margin 21.4% – 15.9%
Return on equity -0.9% – -5.1%
Return on assets -0.4% – -2.0%
Return on invested capital 2.2% – 0.7%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.3x – 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -15.0x – -2.5x
Stock comp / revenue 1.0% – 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricINNOMABPK
Debt / assets 50.3% 43.4% 50.8%
Debt / equity 1.2x 1.2x 1.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 6.0x – 10.9x
Debt / FCF 14.9x – 48.3x
Liabilities / assets 56.3% 63.1% 59.9%
Equity / assets 43.7% 36.9% 40.1%
Interest coverage 0.8x – 0.3x
Current ratio – 1.3x –
Quick ratio – 1.2x –
Cash ratio – 0.7x –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricINNOMABPK
Dividend yield 4.4% 5.5% 6.0%
Net buyback yield 0.8% – –
Shareholder yield 5.2% 5.5% 6.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) -365.5% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 41.8% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) -2.5% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 19.9% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusINNOMABPK
Forward P/E – 14.9xFY2026 33.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.29FY2026 $6.60FY2026 $0.49FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +3.3%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +28.5% +12.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $788.72MFY2026 $933.64MFY2026 $2.42BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +9.2%FY2026 +1.1%FY2026 -4.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -7.0% +19.6% +2.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersINNOMABPK
Held by institutions 88.0% 12.3% 100.0%
Institutions holding 201 163 397
Change in shares held, QoQ -5.4% +5.4% +9.7%
Institutions buying 108 77 218
Institutions selling 56 59 114
Buyers to sellers 1.93 1.31 1.91

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

INNOMABPK
INN 1.00 0.18 0.65
OMAB 0.18 1.00 0.27
PK 0.65 0.27 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, INN, OMAB and PK?

Central North Airport (OMAB) is the largest by market capitalisation: Summit Hotel Properties (INN) $776.55M, Central North Airport (OMAB) $4.74B, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) $3.35B.

Which company is growing faster?

Summit Hotel Properties (INN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Summit Hotel Properties (INN) +1.2%, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) -1.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Summit Hotel Properties (INN) has the highest net margin (Summit Hotel Properties (INN) -1.4%, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) -6.4%). On return on invested capital, Summit Hotel Properties (INN) leads (Summit Hotel Properties (INN) 2.2%, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) 0.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) returned the most: Summit Hotel Properties (INN) +36.6%, Central North Airport (OMAB) -4.2%, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) +50.4%. Over five years, Central North Airport (OMAB) compounded fastest (Summit Hotel Properties (INN) -6.4%/yr, Central North Airport (OMAB) +15.2%/yr, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) -2.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) has the highest dividend yield: Summit Hotel Properties (INN) 4.44%, Central North Airport (OMAB) 5.51%, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) 6.01%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) has been the steadiest (Summit Hotel Properties (INN) 36.0%, Central North Airport (OMAB) 31.1%, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) 30.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, INN, OMAB and PK?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Summit Hotel Properties (INN) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.