INGM vs SCSC vs WIT Stock Comparison

Ingram Micro Holding, Scansource and Wipro Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
INGM Ingram Micro Holding Corp
$28.49 +5.6% 1M +31.1% 1Y
Market cap
$6.61B
P/E
15.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$55.98B
Div. yield
0.01%
Technology Distribution Technology
2 wins
SCSC Scansource, Inc.
$60.98 +4.6% 1M +42.1% 1Y
Market cap
$1.30B
P/E
16.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.23B
Div. yield
–
Technology Distribution Technology
5 wins
WIT Wipro Ltd
$2.08 +26.1% 1M -22.7% 1Y
Market cap
$21.53B
P/E
15.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$10.37B
Div. yield
–
IT Services Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Scansource leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Scansource 5, Wipro 4, Ingram Micro Holding 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionINGMSCSCWITLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $6.61B $1.30B $21.53B WIT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 15.3x 16.5x 15.3x WIT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 8.8x 13.1x 14.9x INGM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +11.5% +6.1% -0.4% INGM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.8% 2.4% 13.6% WIT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.2% 7.4% 16.6% WIT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.5x 0.1x 0.4x SCSC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +31.1% +42.1% -22.7% SCSC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +11.0%/yr -14.6%/yr SCSC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 44.1% 38.3% 46.7% SCSC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 49/100 63/100 50/100 SCSC

Percentile Scorecard

INGMSCSCWIT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisINGMSCSCWIT
Valuation 63 #19 of 50 69 #16 of 50 39 #31 of 50
Growth 86 #7 of 45 59 #19 of 45 14 #39 of 45
Profitability 30 #29 of 41 50 #21 of 41 93 #4 of 41
Financial Health 28 #45 of 62 61 #25 of 62 56 #28 of 62
Shareholder Returns 38 #19 of 30 76 #8 of 30 52 #15 of 30
Overall 49 63 50
  • INGM ranked among 66 companies in Technology Services
  • SCSC ranked among 66 companies in Technology Services
  • WIT ranked among 66 companies in Technology Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodINGMSCSCWITSPY
1 month +5.6%+4.6%+26.1% -0.8%
3 months -2.2%+9.6%+8.3% +3.5%
6 months -5.6%+50.0%+1.5% +7.0%
Year to date +33.5%+56.1%-26.8% +12.2%
1 year +31.1%+42.1%-22.7% +13.0%
3 years —+104.2%-7.8% +86.3%
3 years, per year —+26.9%-2.7% +23.1%
5 years —+68.3%-54.6% +68.6%
5 years, per year —+11.0%-14.6% +11.0%
10 years —+65.3%+15.8% +258.0%
10 years, per year —+5.2%+1.5% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureINGMSCSCWITSPY
Volatility, 1Y 44.1%38.3%46.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 46.8%42.4%47.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.251.090.44 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.711.10-0.49 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -40.8%-44.2%-66.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -10.0%-2.0%-32.0% -1.8%
52-week high $31.64$62.22$3.06 $779.14
52-week low $19.51$34.27$1.62 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleINGMSCSCWIT
P/E now vs peer median 15.3xmedian 17.9x 16.5xmedian 17.9x 15.5xmedian 17.9x
P/S now vs peer median 0.1xmedian 0.7x 0.4xmedian 0.7x 2.1xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.1xmedian 11.0x 10.1xmedian 11.0x 11.1xmedian 11.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -29.0xmedian 12.1x 10.8xmedian 12.1x 13.9xmedian 12.1x
P/B now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 1.4x 1.3xmedian 1.4x 2.6xmedian 1.4x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.49 18.65median 1.49 11.60median 1.49

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsINGMSCSCWIT
Revenue $55.98B $3.23B $10.37B
Gross profit $3.72B $437.36M $3.00B
Operating income $992.13M $98.63M $1.68B
Net income $430.60M $78.87M $1.43B
Free cash flow -$231.59M $113.85M $1.57B
EPS (diluted) $1.85 $3.64 $0.13
Cash & equivalents $808.97M $88.37M $992.00M
Total debt $3.80B $101.41M $7.07B
Shares (diluted) 232.23M 21.69M 10.50B
Enterprise value $2.21B $882.55M $16.67B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricINGMSCSCWIT
P/E 15.3x 16.5x 15.5x
P/FCF -29.0x 10.8x 13.9x
P/Operating cash flow -69.4x 10.0x 12.6x
P/S 0.1x 0.4x 2.1x
P/B 1.6x 1.3x 2.6x
P/Tangible book 1.9x 1.5x 2.8x
EV/EBITDA 8.1x 10.1x 11.1x
EV/EBIT 9.8x 12.6x 13.4x
EV/Revenue 0.2x 0.4x 2.2x
EV/FCF -41.9x 10.9x 14.4x
EV/Operating cash flow -100.4x 10.1x 13.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 18.65 11.60

Growth

14 metrics
MetricINGMSCSCWIT
Revenue growth (1Y) 11.5% 6.1% -0.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -5.2% -2.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 7.9% 7.0% -4.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -0.9% -3.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) 22.4% 15.8% -4.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -10.1% -36.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 61.2% 10.2% -9.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -4.2% 0.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 63.1% 21.2% -10.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 0.9% 1.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 79.3% 9.6% -8.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 75.9% -3.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 61.7% 9.4% -9.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 65.7% -8.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricINGMSCSCWIT
Gross margin 6.6% 13.6% 28.9%
EBITDA margin 2.1% 3.8% 19.6%
Operating margin 1.8% 3.1% 16.2%
Pretax margin 1.2% 3.2% 17.9%
Net margin 0.8% 2.4% 13.6%
FCF margin -0.4% 3.5% 15.2%
Operating cash flow margin -0.2% 3.8% 16.7%
Return on equity 10.2% 8.7% 17.1%
Return on assets 2.0% 4.2% 10.1%
Return on invested capital 8.2% 7.4% 16.6%
Return on capital employed 14.0% 9.8% 17.6%
Asset turnover 2.6x 1.7x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.2x 1.6x 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue 0.1% 0.4% 0.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricINGMSCSCWIT
Debt / assets 17.6% 5.2% 13.6%
Debt / equity 0.9x 0.1x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.5x 0.1x 0.4x
Debt / FCF -16.4x 0.9x 1.2x
Liabilities / assets 80.1% 52.9% 41.4%
Equity / assets 19.9% 47.1% 58.6%
Interest coverage 3.3x 15.0x 8.4x
Current ratio 1.3x 1.8x 1.7x
Quick ratio 0.8x 1.1x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.1x 0.3x
Altman Z-score 3.34 3.70 4.27

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricINGMSCSCWIT
Dividend yield 1.2% – 4.3%
Net buyback yield 1.6% 7.6% 0.0%
Shareholder yield 2.7% 7.6% 4.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) 17.6% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) -32.8% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 85.9% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusINGMSCSCWIT
Forward P/E 8.8xFY2026 13.1xFY2027 14.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $3.25FY2026 $4.64FY2027 $0.14FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +12.1%FY2026 +9.4%FY2027 0.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +10.2% +25.6% -7.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $55.78BFY2026 $3.40BFY2027 $10.89BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +6.1%FY2026 +5.3%FY2027 +9.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +3.1% +16.8% +1.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersINGMSCSCWIT
Held by institutions 100.0% 100.0% 3.1%
Institutions holding 228 212 297
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.0% -0.2% -3.4%
Institutions buying 165 111 175
Institutions selling 44 74 93
Buyers to sellers 3.75 1.50 1.88

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

INGMSCSCWIT
INGM 1.00 0.44 0.02
SCSC 0.44 1.00 0.15
WIT 0.02 0.15 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, INGM, SCSC and WIT?

Wipro (WIT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) $6.61B, Scansource (SCSC) $1.30B, Wipro (WIT) $21.53B.

Which stock is cheaper, INGM, SCSC and WIT?

Wipro (WIT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) 15.3x, Scansource (SCSC) 16.5x, Wipro (WIT) 15.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) is cheapest (Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) 8.8x, Scansource (SCSC) 13.1x, Wipro (WIT) 14.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) +11.5%, Scansource (SCSC) +6.1%, Wipro (WIT) -0.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Wipro (WIT) has the highest net margin (Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) 0.8%, Scansource (SCSC) 2.4%, Wipro (WIT) 13.6%). On return on invested capital, Wipro (WIT) leads (Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) 8.2%, Scansource (SCSC) 7.4%, Wipro (WIT) 16.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Scansource (SCSC) returned the most: Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) +31.1%, Scansource (SCSC) +42.1%, Wipro (WIT) -22.7%. Over five years, Scansource (SCSC) compounded fastest (Scansource (SCSC) +11.0%/yr, Wipro (WIT) -14.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) 0.01%, Scansource (SCSC) 0.00%, Wipro (WIT) 0.00%. Scansource (SCSC) and Wipro (WIT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Scansource (SCSC) has been the steadiest (Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) 44.1%, Scansource (SCSC) 38.3%, Wipro (WIT) 46.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, INGM, SCSC and WIT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Scansource (SCSC) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.