INGM vs INVU vs MLKMF Stock Comparison

Ingram Micro Holding, Investview and Waldencast Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
INGM Ingram Micro Holding Corp
$28.27 +4.7% 1M +27.9% 1Y
Market cap
$6.49B
P/E
15.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$55.98B
Div. yield
0.01%
Technology Distribution Technology
4 wins
INVU Investview, Inc.
$0.02 0.0% 1M -33.3% 1Y
Market cap
$28.81M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$19.98M
Div. yield
–
Technology Distribution Technology
1 win
MLKMF Waldencast plc
$0.88 -14.6% 1M -54.4% 1Y
Market cap
$92.40M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Cosmetics Consumer Staples

Head to Head

5 decided of 12

Ingram Micro Holding leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Ingram Micro Holding 4, Investview 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionINGMINVUMLKMFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $6.49B $28.81M $92.40M INGM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 15.1x — — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 8.7x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +11.5% -54.2% — INGM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.8% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.2% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.5x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +27.9% -33.3% -54.4% INGM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -28.9%/yr -38.2%/yr INVU
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 44.0% 194.4% 100.5% INGM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 50/100 — — –

Percentile Scorecard

INGMINVUMLKMF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisINGMINVUMLKMF
Valuation 65 #18 of 50 – –
Growth 86 #7 of 45 – –
Profitability 30 #29 of 41 – –
Financial Health 28 #45 of 62 – 67 #19 of 56
Shareholder Returns 38 #19 of 30 – –
Overall 50 – –
  • INGM ranked among 66 companies in Technology Services
  • INVU ranked among 66 companies in Technology Services
  • MLKMF ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodINGMINVUMLKMFSPY
1 month +4.7%0.0%-14.6% -0.2%
3 months -6.0%-33.3%-47.3% +3.9%
6 months -4.8%-33.3%+12.8% +8.2%
Year to date +32.5%-33.3%-53.2% +12.9%
1 year +27.9%-33.3%-54.4% +12.3%
3 years —+100.0%-90.0% +87.4%
3 years, per year —+26.0%-53.6% +23.3%
5 years —-81.8%-90.9% +67.9%
5 years, per year —-28.9%-38.2% +10.9%
10 years —+100.0%— +261.1%
10 years, per year —+7.2%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureINGMINVUMLKMFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 44.0%194.4%100.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 46.7%901.4%88.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.251.661.35 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.63-0.17-0.54 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -40.8%-91.7%-93.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -10.7%-33.3%-71.4% -1.2%
52-week high $31.64$0.03$3.08 $779.14
52-week low $19.51$0.01$0.75 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleINGMINVUMLKMF
P/E now vs peer median 15.2xmedian 17.4x —median 17.4x —median 18.5x
P/S now vs peer median 0.1xmedian 0.7x 1.8xmedian 0.7x —median 1.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.0xmedian 10.7x —median 10.7x —median 12.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median -28.7xmedian 11.5x —median 11.5x —median 18.6x
P/B now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 1.4x —median 1.4x 0.3xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.51 —median 1.51 —median 0.97

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsINGMINVUMLKMF
Revenue $55.98B $19.98M –
Gross profit $3.72B – –
Operating income $992.13M – –
Net income $430.60M – –
Free cash flow -$231.59M – –
EPS (diluted) $1.85 – –
Cash & equivalents $808.97M – $7.82M
Total debt $3.80B – $631.43M
Shares (diluted) 232.23M 1.85B 114.07M
Enterprise value $2.10B $28.81M $30.43M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricINGMINVUMLKMF
P/E 15.2x – –
P/FCF -28.7x – –
P/Operating cash flow -68.9x – –
P/S 0.1x 1.8x –
P/B 1.6x – 0.3x
P/Tangible book 1.8x – 0.3x
EV/EBITDA 8.0x – –
EV/EBIT 9.7x – –
EV/Revenue 0.2x 1.8x –
EV/FCF -41.6x – –
EV/Operating cash flow -99.8x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricINGMINVUMLKMF
Revenue growth (1Y) 11.5% -54.2% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -30.9% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 7.9% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 22.4% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) 61.2% – –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – –
EPS growth (1Y) 63.1% – –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 79.3% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 61.7% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricINGMINVUMLKMF
Gross margin 6.6% – –
EBITDA margin 2.1% – –
Operating margin 1.8% – –
Pretax margin 1.2% – –
Net margin 0.8% – –
FCF margin -0.4% – –
Operating cash flow margin -0.2% – –
Return on equity 10.2% – –
Return on assets 2.0% – –
Return on invested capital 8.2% – –
Return on capital employed 14.0% – –
Asset turnover 2.6x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.2x – –
Stock comp / revenue 0.1% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricINGMINVUMLKMF
Debt / assets 17.6% – 23.1%
Debt / equity 0.9x – 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.5x – –
Debt / FCF -16.4x – –
Liabilities / assets 80.1% – 39.5%
Equity / assets 19.9% – 60.5%
Interest coverage 3.3x – –
Current ratio 1.3x – 4.8x
Quick ratio 0.8x – 0.1x
Cash ratio 0.1x – 0.1x
Altman Z-score 3.34 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricINGMINVUMLKMF
Dividend yield 1.2% – –
Net buyback yield 1.6% – –
Shareholder yield 2.7% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) 17.6% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) -32.8% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 85.9% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusINGMINVUMLKMF
Forward P/E 8.7xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $3.25FY2026 – $-0.51FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +12.1%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after +10.2% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $55.78BFY2026 – $272.64MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +6.1%FY2026 – +0.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +3.1% – +10.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersINGMINVUMLKMF
Held by institutions 100.0% – –
Institutions holding 228 – –
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.0% – –
Institutions buying 165 – –
Institutions selling 44 – –
Buyers to sellers 3.75 – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

INGMINVUMLKMF
INGM 1.00 -0.03 0.06
INVU -0.03 1.00 0.03
MLKMF 0.06 0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, INGM, INVU and MLKMF?

Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) $6.49B, Investview (INVU) $28.81M, Waldencast (MLKMF) $92.40M.

Which company is growing faster?

Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) +11.5%, Investview (INVU) -54.2%.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) returned the most: Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) +27.9%, Investview (INVU) -33.3%, Waldencast (MLKMF) -54.4%. Over five years, Investview (INVU) compounded fastest (Investview (INVU) -28.9%/yr, Waldencast (MLKMF) -38.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) 0.01%, Investview (INVU) 0.00%, Waldencast (MLKMF) 0.00%. Investview (INVU) and Waldencast (MLKMF) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) has been the steadiest (Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) 44.0%, Investview (INVU) 194.4%, Waldencast (MLKMF) 100.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, INGM, INVU and MLKMF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.