INGM vs ARW vs TRT Stock Comparison

Ingram Micro Holding, Arrow Electronics and Trio-Tech International Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
INGM Ingram Micro Holding Corp
$28.49 +5.6% 1M +31.1% 1Y
Market cap
$6.64B
P/E
15.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$55.98B
Div. yield
0.01%
Technology Distribution Technology
1 win
ARW Arrow Electronics, Inc.
$214.35 -7.9% 1M +78.7% 1Y
Market cap
$11.17B
P/E
13.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$35.92B
Div. yield
–
Technology Distribution Technology
9 wins
TRT Trio-Tech International
$5.04 -19.0% 1M +39.6% 1Y
Market cap
$46.67M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Industrial Machinery Industrials
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Arrow Electronics leads on 9 of the 12 questions below (Arrow Electronics 9, Ingram Micro Holding 1, Trio-Tech International 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionINGMARWTRTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $6.64B $11.17B $46.67M ARW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 15.4x 13.8x -1,335x ARW
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 8.8x 9.3x 21.0x INGM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +11.5% +26.1% — ARW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.8% 2.3% — ARW
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.2% 10.2% — ARW
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.5x 1.4x — ARW
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +31.1% +78.7% +39.6% ARW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +13.7%/yr +18.2%/yr TRT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 44.1% 37.5% 131.1% ARW
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 49/100 52/100 — ARW

Percentile Scorecard

INGMARWTRT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisINGMARWTRT
Valuation 63 #19 of 50 76 #13 of 50 69 #64 of 203
Growth 86 #7 of 45 77 #11 of 45 –
Profitability 30 #29 of 41 43 #24 of 41 –
Financial Health 28 #45 of 62 31 #43 of 62 92 #18 of 219
Shareholder Returns 38 #19 of 30 35 #20 of 30 –
Overall 49 52 –
  • INGM ranked among 66 companies in Technology Services
  • ARW ranked among 66 companies in Technology Services
  • TRT ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodINGMARWTRTSPY
1 month +5.6%-7.9%-19.0% -0.8%
3 months -2.2%+0.5%-48.4% +3.5%
6 months -5.6%+14.9%-64.3% +7.0%
Year to date +33.5%+94.5%-23.9% +12.2%
1 year +31.1%+78.7%+39.6% +13.0%
3 years —+91.7%+46.9% +86.3%
3 years, per year —+24.2%+13.7% +23.1%
5 years —+90.1%+130.1% +68.6%
5 years, per year —+13.7%+18.2% +11.0%
10 years —+243.6%+211.1% +258.0%
10 years, per year —+13.1%+12.0% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureINGMARWTRTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 44.1%37.5%131.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 46.8%34.8%118.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.251.472.05 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.712.100.30 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -40.8%-38.2%-75.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -10.0%-11.5%-74.9% -1.8%
52-week high $31.64$242.14$20.05 $779.14
52-week low $19.51$101.87$3.27 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleINGMARWTRT
P/E now vs peer median 15.3xmedian 17.9x 13.6xmedian 17.9x -1,335xmedian 26.0x
P/S now vs peer median 0.1xmedian 0.7x 0.3xmedian 0.7x 0.8xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.1xmedian 11.0x 9.5xmedian 11.0x —median 14.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -29.0xmedian 12.1x 13.2xmedian 12.1x 31.0xmedian 21.4x
P/B now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 1.4x 1.5xmedian 1.4x 1.2xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.49 -1.46median 1.49 —median 1.26

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsINGMARWTRT
Revenue $55.98B $35.92B –
Gross profit $3.72B $4.06B –
Operating income $992.13M $1.21B –
Net income $430.60M $811.67M –
Free cash flow -$231.59M $825.46M –
EPS (diluted) $1.85 $15.65 –
Cash & equivalents $808.97M $244.63M $21.43M
Total debt $3.80B $10.85B $3.90M
Shares (diluted) 232.23M 51.87M 9.01M
Enterprise value $2.25B $10.12B -$21.11M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricINGMARWTRT
P/E 15.3x 13.6x -1,335x
P/FCF -29.0x 13.2x 31.0x
P/Operating cash flow -69.4x 11.7x –
P/S 0.1x 0.3x 0.8x
P/B 1.6x 1.5x 1.2x
P/Tangible book 1.9x 1.6x 1.2x
EV/EBITDA 8.1x 9.5x –
EV/EBIT 9.8x 10.6x –
EV/Revenue 0.2x 0.4x –
EV/FCF -41.9x 15.6x –
EV/Operating cash flow -100.4x 13.7x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -1.46 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricINGMARWTRT
Revenue growth (1Y) 11.5% 26.1% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 0.1% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 7.9% 26.4% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -3.9% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 22.4% 68.5% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -13.0% –
Net income growth (1Y) 61.2% 73.6% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -12.5% –
EPS growth (1Y) 63.1% 75.3% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -9.3% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 79.3% 69.4% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 39.3% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 61.7% 76.3% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 45.7% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricINGMARWTRT
Gross margin 6.6% 11.3% –
EBITDA margin 2.1% 3.8% –
Operating margin 1.8% 3.4% –
Pretax margin 1.2% 2.9% –
Net margin 0.8% 2.3% –
FCF margin -0.4% 2.3% –
Operating cash flow margin -0.2% 2.6% –
Return on equity 10.2% 11.7% –
Return on assets 2.0% 2.2% –
Return on invested capital 8.2% 10.2% –
Return on capital employed 14.0% 14.4% –
Asset turnover 2.6x 1.0x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.2x 1.2x –
Stock comp / revenue 0.1% 0.1% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricINGMARWTRT
Debt / assets 17.6% 5.7% 1.1%
Debt / equity 0.9x 0.3x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.5x 1.4x –
Debt / FCF -16.4x 2.6x –
Liabilities / assets 80.1% 81.6% 26.1%
Equity / assets 19.9% 18.4% 73.9%
Interest coverage 3.3x – –
Current ratio 1.3x 1.2x 3.4x
Quick ratio 0.8x 1.0x 2.8x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.0x 1.7x
Altman Z-score 3.34 1.70 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricINGMARWTRT
Dividend yield 1.2% – –
Net buyback yield 1.6% 1.1% –
Shareholder yield 2.7% 1.1% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) 17.6% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) -32.8% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 85.9% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusINGMARWTRT
Forward P/E 8.8xFY2026 9.3xFY2026 21.0xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $3.25FY2026 $23.06FY2026 $0.24FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +12.1%FY2026 +109.3%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +10.2% +9.8% +62.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $55.78BFY2026 $41.84BFY2026 $83.20MFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +6.1%FY2026 +35.6%FY2026 +32.9%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +3.1% -3.8% +28.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersINGMARWTRT
Held by institutions 100.0% 100.0% 21.3%
Institutions holding 228 632 37
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.0% -2.6% +2.0%
Institutions buying 165 359 27
Institutions selling 44 195 6
Buyers to sellers 3.75 1.84 4.50

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

INGMARWTRT
INGM 1.00 0.37 0.07
ARW 0.37 1.00 0.17
TRT 0.07 0.17 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, INGM, ARW and TRT?

Arrow Electronics (ARW) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) $6.64B, Arrow Electronics (ARW) $11.17B, Trio-Tech International (TRT) $46.67M.

Which stock is cheaper, INGM, ARW and TRT?

Arrow Electronics (ARW) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) 15.4x, Arrow Electronics (ARW) 13.8x, Trio-Tech International (TRT) -1,335x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) is cheapest (Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) 8.8x, Arrow Electronics (ARW) 9.3x, Trio-Tech International (TRT) 21.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Arrow Electronics (ARW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) +11.5%, Arrow Electronics (ARW) +26.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Arrow Electronics (ARW) has the highest net margin (Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) 0.8%, Arrow Electronics (ARW) 2.3%). On return on invested capital, Arrow Electronics (ARW) leads (Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) 8.2%, Arrow Electronics (ARW) 10.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Arrow Electronics (ARW) returned the most: Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) +31.1%, Arrow Electronics (ARW) +78.7%, Trio-Tech International (TRT) +39.6%. Over five years, Trio-Tech International (TRT) compounded fastest (Arrow Electronics (ARW) +13.7%/yr, Trio-Tech International (TRT) +18.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) 0.01%, Arrow Electronics (ARW) 0.00%, Trio-Tech International (TRT) 0.00%. Arrow Electronics (ARW) and Trio-Tech International (TRT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Arrow Electronics (ARW) has been the steadiest (Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) 44.1%, Arrow Electronics (ARW) 37.5%, Trio-Tech International (TRT) 131.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, INGM, ARW and TRT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Arrow Electronics (ARW) leads on 9. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.