ING vs MUFG vs UWMC Stock Comparison

Ing Groep, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial and UWM Holdings Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ING Ing Groep Nv
$32.56 -10.9% 1M +34.0% 1Y
Market cap
$98.23B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Money Center Banks Financial Services
UWMC UWM Holdings Corp
$1.55 +26.0% 1M -73.5% 1Y
Market cap
$509.66M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.58B
Div. yield
–
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
3 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Mitsubishi Ufj Financial leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial 6, UWM Holdings 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionINGMUFGUWMCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $98.23B $244.35B $509.66M MUFG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 16.2x -13.7x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 12.1x 12.6x 8.2x UWMC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — -12.0% +26.1% UWMC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 47.7% -1.0% MUFG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 3.6% 6.3% UWMC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 10.6x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +34.0% +44.2% -73.5% MUFG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +16.3%/yr +31.0%/yr -25.6%/yr MUFG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 27.8% 26.3% 80.1% MUFG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 37/100 36/100 MUFG

Percentile Scorecard

INGMUFGUWMC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisINGMUFGUWMC
Valuation – 20 #287 of 360 20 #136 of 169
Growth – 82 #36 of 191 16 #135 of 160
Profitability – 61 #66 of 168 32 #102 of 149
Financial Health 22 #136 of 175 6 #164 of 175 18 #130 of 158
Shareholder Returns 93 #24 of 341 16 #287 of 341 95 #8 of 136
Overall – 37 36
  • ING ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • MUFG ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • UWMC ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodINGMUFGUWMCSPY
1 month -10.9%-8.5%+26.0% -0.2%
3 months -2.2%-4.2%-17.1% +3.9%
6 months +15.9%+22.5%-57.5% +8.2%
Year to date +16.3%+35.5%-64.6% +12.9%
1 year +34.0%+44.2%-73.5% +12.3%
3 years +157.8%+160.8%-68.9% +87.4%
3 years, per year +37.1%+37.7%-32.3% +23.3%
5 years +112.5%+285.1%-77.1% +67.9%
5 years, per year +16.3%+31.0%-25.6% +10.9%
10 years +148.4%+318.1%— +261.1%
10 years, per year +9.5%+15.4%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureINGMUFGUWMCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 27.8%26.3%80.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 26.7%26.7%89.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.350.921.48 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.231.68-0.92 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -47.4%-35.6%-89.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -12.6%-11.0%-74.6% -1.2%
52-week high $37.26$24.14$6.10 $779.14
52-week low $24.17$14.88$1.00 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleINGMUFGUWMC
P/E now vs peer median —median 12.1x 16.2xmedian 12.1x -14.1xmedian 11.1x
P/S now vs peer median —median 3.4x 8.1xmedian 3.4x 0.7xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 5.0x —median 5.0x 15.3xmedian 13.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 10.9x —median 10.9x -0.5xmedian 7.0x
P/B now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 1.2x 2.4xmedian 1.2x 2.5xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.34 0.27median 1.34 0.28median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsINGMUFGUWMC
Revenue – $31.62B $3.58B
Gross profit – $29.85B –
Operating income – $18.02B –
Net income – $13.97B -$104.96M
Free cash flow – – -$4.92B
EPS (diluted) – $1.32 $-0.11
Cash & equivalents $74.19B – $498.41M
Total debt $21.78B $494.43B $19.23B
Shares (diluted) 2.99B 11.40B 337.53M
Enterprise value -$445.22B -$97.04B -$1.79B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricINGMUFGUWMC
P/E – 16.2x -14.1x
P/FCF – – -0.5x
P/Operating cash flow – – -0.5x
P/S – 8.1x 0.7x
P/B 1.5x 2.4x 2.5x
P/Tangible book 1.6x 2.4x -0.6x
EV/EBITDA – – 15.3x
EV/EBIT – 5.5x 17.3x
EV/Revenue – 3.1x 2.2x
EV/FCF – – -1.6x
EV/Operating cash flow – – -1.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.27 0.28

Growth

14 metrics
MetricINGMUFGUWMC
Revenue growth (1Y) – -12.0% 26.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -2.4% 27.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 38.8% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 7.6% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 24.8% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 12.7% –
Net income growth (1Y) – 62.6% -175.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 32.4% -31.9%
EPS growth (1Y) – 104.8% -287.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 59.4% -51.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – -103.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -18.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – -100.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -18.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricINGMUFGUWMC
Gross margin – 94.4% –
EBITDA margin – – 14.6%
Operating margin – 57.0% –
Pretax margin – 59.6% -3.2%
Net margin – 47.7% -1.0%
FCF margin – – -137.6%
Operating cash flow margin – – -135.9%
Return on equity – 11.7% -8.1%
Return on assets – 0.5% -0.6%
Return on invested capital – 3.6% 6.3%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover – 0.0x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – 46.3x
Stock comp / revenue – – 1.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricINGMUFGUWMC
Debt / assets 1.6% 4.7% 33.5%
Debt / equity 0.4x 1.2x 6.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 10.6x
Debt / FCF – – -1.2x
Liabilities / assets 95.3% 96.0% 94.5%
Equity / assets 4.7% 4.0% 5.5%
Interest coverage – 0.6x 0.8x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricINGMUFGUWMC
Dividend yield 4.7% 1.4% 19.4%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 4.7% 1.4% 19.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusINGMUFGUWMC
Forward P/E 12.1xFY2026 12.6xFY2026 8.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.68FY2026 $1.71FY2026 $0.19FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +5.9%FY2026 +27.6%FY2026 +58.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +18.3% +0.6% +26.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $27.20BFY2026 $44.38BFY2026 $2.26BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -1.0%FY2026 +18.6%FY2026 -5.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +3.2% +4.0% +37.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersINGMUFGUWMC
Held by institutions 4.5% 3.0% 17.0%
Institutions holding 589 574 290
Change in shares held, QoQ -19.0% -0.1% +31.8%
Institutions buying 319 324 213
Institutions selling 154 160 50
Buyers to sellers 2.07 2.03 4.26

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

INGMUFGUWMC
ING 1.00 0.57 0.12
MUFG 0.57 1.00 0.10
UWMC 0.12 0.10 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ING, MUFG and UWMC?

Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ing Groep (ING) $98.23B, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) $244.35B, UWM Holdings (UWMC) $509.66M.

Which company is growing faster?

UWM Holdings (UWMC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) -12.0%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) +26.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) has the highest net margin (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 47.7%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -1.0%). On return on invested capital, UWM Holdings (UWMC) leads (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 3.6%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 6.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) returned the most: Ing Groep (ING) +34.0%, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) +44.2%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -73.5%. Over five years, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) compounded fastest (Ing Groep (ING) +16.3%/yr, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) +31.0%/yr, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -25.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) has been the steadiest (Ing Groep (ING) 27.8%, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 26.3%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 80.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ING, MUFG and UWMC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.