ING vs BAC vs MUFG Stock Comparison

Ing Groep, Bank Of America and Mitsubishi Ufj Financial Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ING Ing Groep Nv
$32.56 -10.9% 1M +34.0% 1Y
Market cap
$94.50B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
4.67%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
1 win
BAC Bank Of America Corp /De/
$50.68 -10.6% 1M -4.4% 1Y
Market cap
$355.67B
P/E
11.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$121.10B
Div. yield
2.29%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
7 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Bank Of America leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Bank Of America 7, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial 3, Ing Groep 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionINGBACMUFGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $94.50B $355.67B $255.04B BAC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 11.3x 16.2x BAC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 12.1x 11.2x 12.6x BAC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +9.7% -12.0% BAC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 26.5% 47.7% MUFG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 13.1% 3.6% BAC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -1.6x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 4.67% 2.29% 1.44% ING
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +34.0% -4.4% +44.2% MUFG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +16.3%/yr +1.2%/yr +31.0%/yr MUFG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 27.8% 21.8% 26.3% BAC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 70/100 37/100 BAC

Percentile Scorecard

INGBACMUFG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisINGBACMUFG
Valuation – 96 #17 of 360 20 #287 of 360
Growth – 82 #35 of 191 82 #36 of 191
Profitability – 73 #46 of 168 61 #66 of 168
Financial Health 22 #136 of 175 24 #133 of 175 6 #164 of 175
Shareholder Returns 93 #24 of 341 76 #84 of 341 16 #287 of 341
Overall – 70 37
  • ING ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • BAC ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • MUFG ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodINGBACMUFGSPY
1 month -10.9%-10.6%-8.5% -0.2%
3 months -2.2%-19.1%-4.2% +3.9%
6 months +15.9%-3.8%+22.5% +8.2%
Year to date +16.3%-7.9%+35.5% +12.9%
1 year +34.0%-4.4%+44.2% +12.3%
3 years +157.8%+101.4%+160.8% +87.4%
3 years, per year +37.1%+26.3%+37.7% +23.3%
5 years +112.5%+6.1%+285.1% +67.9%
5 years, per year +16.3%+1.2%+31.0% +10.9%
10 years +148.4%+199.7%+318.1% +261.1%
10 years, per year +9.5%+11.6%+15.4% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureINGBACMUFGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 27.8%21.8%26.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 26.7%25.6%26.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.350.720.92 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.23-0.201.68 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -47.4%-49.0%-35.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -12.6%-21.8%-11.0% -1.2%
52-week high $37.26$64.82$24.14 $779.14
52-week low $24.17$46.72$14.88 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleINGBACMUFG
P/E now vs peer median —median 12.1x 11.3xmedian 12.1x 16.2xmedian 12.1x
P/S now vs peer median —median 3.4x 2.9xmedian 3.4x 8.1xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 5.0x 1.4xmedian 5.0x —median 5.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 10.9x 3.8xmedian 10.9x —median 10.9x
P/B now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 1.2x 1.2xmedian 1.2x 2.4xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.34 1.40median 1.34 0.27median 1.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsINGBACMUFG
Revenue – $121.10B $31.62B
Gross profit – – $29.85B
Operating income – – $18.02B
Net income – $33.66B $13.97B
Free cash flow – $94.74B –
EPS (diluted) – $4.41 $1.32
Cash & equivalents $74.19B $229.75B –
Total debt $21.78B $399.84B $494.43B
Shares (diluted) 2.99B 7.29B 11.40B
Enterprise value -$447.64B -$2.02T -$77.20B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricINGBACMUFG
P/E – 11.3x 16.2x
P/FCF – 3.8x –
P/Operating cash flow – 3.8x –
P/S – 2.9x 8.1x
P/B 1.5x 1.2x 2.4x
P/Tangible book 1.6x 1.2x 2.4x
EV/EBITDA – 1.4x –
EV/EBIT – 1.4x 5.5x
EV/Revenue – 1.4x 3.1x
EV/FCF – 1.8x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 1.8x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 1.40 0.27

Growth

14 metrics
MetricINGBACMUFG
Revenue growth (1Y) – 9.7% -12.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 6.4% -2.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 38.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 7.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) – – 24.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – 12.7%
Net income growth (1Y) – 20.5% 62.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 4.2% 32.4%
EPS growth (1Y) – 27.5% 104.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 8.0% 59.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 517.8% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 28.5% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 517.8% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 28.5% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricINGBACMUFG
Gross margin – – 94.4%
EBITDA margin – 99.4% –
Operating margin – – 57.0%
Pretax margin – 36.2% 59.6%
Net margin – 26.5% 47.7%
FCF margin – 78.2% –
Operating cash flow margin – 78.2% –
Return on equity – 11.2% 11.7%
Return on assets – 1.0% 0.5%
Return on invested capital – 13.1% 3.6%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover – 0.0x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 2.8x –
Stock comp / revenue – 3.4% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricINGBACMUFG
Debt / assets 1.6% 11.4% 4.7%
Debt / equity 0.4x 1.3x 1.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – -1.6x –
Debt / FCF – 4.2x –
Liabilities / assets 95.3% 91.4% 96.0%
Equity / assets 4.7% 8.6% 4.0%
Interest coverage – 1.6x 0.6x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricINGBACMUFG
Dividend yield 4.7% 2.3% 1.4%
Net buyback yield – 6.6% –
Shareholder yield 4.7% 8.9% 1.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 29.0% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 10.3% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 2.6% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 3.5% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusINGBACMUFG
Forward P/E 12.1xFY2026 11.2xFY2026 12.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.68FY2026 $4.52FY2026 $1.71FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +5.9%FY2026 +18.6%FY2026 +27.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +18.3% +19.9% +0.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $27.20BFY2026 $127.79BFY2026 $44.38BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -1.0%FY2026 +13.0%FY2026 +18.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +3.2% -2.4% +4.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersINGBACMUFG
Held by institutions 4.5% 75.0% 3.0%
Institutions holding 589 3,614 574
Change in shares held, QoQ -19.0% +0.7% -0.1%
Institutions buying 319 1,827 324
Institutions selling 154 1,342 160
Buyers to sellers 2.07 1.36 2.03

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

INGBACMUFG
ING 1.00 0.50 0.57
BAC 0.50 1.00 0.42
MUFG 0.57 0.42 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ING, BAC and MUFG?

Bank Of America (BAC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ing Groep (ING) $94.50B, Bank Of America (BAC) $355.67B, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) $255.04B.

Which stock is cheaper, ING, BAC and MUFG?

Bank Of America (BAC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Bank Of America (BAC) 11.3x, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 16.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Bank Of America (BAC) is cheapest (Ing Groep (ING) 12.1x, Bank Of America (BAC) 11.2x, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 12.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Bank Of America (BAC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Bank Of America (BAC) +9.7%, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) -12.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) has the highest net margin (Bank Of America (BAC) 26.5%, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 47.7%). On return on invested capital, Bank Of America (BAC) leads (Bank Of America (BAC) 13.1%, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 3.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) returned the most: Ing Groep (ING) +34.0%, Bank Of America (BAC) -4.4%, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) +44.2%. Over five years, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) compounded fastest (Ing Groep (ING) +16.3%/yr, Bank Of America (BAC) +1.2%/yr, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) +31.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Ing Groep (ING) has the highest dividend yield: Ing Groep (ING) 4.67%, Bank Of America (BAC) 2.29%, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 1.44%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Bank Of America (BAC) has been the steadiest (Ing Groep (ING) 27.8%, Bank Of America (BAC) 21.8%, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 26.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ING, BAC and MUFG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Bank Of America (BAC) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.