INFQ vs QBTS vs ARQQ Stock Comparison

Infleqtion, D-Wave Quantum and Arqit Quantum Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
INFQ Infleqtion, Inc.
$9.43 -31.9% 1M
Market cap
$1.93B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$41.08M
Div. yield
–
Quantum Computing Technology
2 wins
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc.
$11.56 -29.6% 1M -66.3% 1Y
Market cap
$3.92B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$12.43M
Div. yield
–
Quantum Computing Technology
3 wins
ARQQ Arqit Quantum Inc.
$17.60 -27.0% 1M -61.2% 1Y
Market cap
$218.82M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Quantum Computing Technology
1 win

Head to Head

6 decided of 12

D-Wave Quantum leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (D-Wave Quantum 3, Infleqtion 2, Arqit Quantum 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionINFQQBTSARQQLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.93B $3.92B $218.82M QBTS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -19.5x -15.8x — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — -44.2% — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -240.6% -2,001.6% — INFQ
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -12.3% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 3.2x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months — -66.3% -61.2% ARQQ
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +3.3%/yr -49.7%/yr QBTS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 105.8% 100.2% 110.8% QBTS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 34/100 33/100 — INFQ

Percentile Scorecard

INFQQBTSARQQ

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisINFQQBTSARQQ
Valuation 29 #88 of 124 20 #100 of 124 –
Growth 21 #89 of 113 12 #100 of 113 –
Profitability 19 #88 of 109 15 #93 of 109 –
Financial Health 96 #6 of 127 92 #11 of 127 84 #21 of 127
Shareholder Returns 5 #60 of 63 26 #47 of 63 –
Overall 34 33 –
  • INFQ ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • QBTS ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • ARQQ ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodINFQQBTSARQQSPY
1 month -31.9%-29.6%-27.0% +0.7%
3 months -5.5%-35.7%-0.6% +3.7%
6 months -20.7%-43.0%+22.6% +7.1%
Year to date —-55.8%-19.6% +12.8%
1 year —-66.3%-61.2% +11.9%
3 years —+1,706.3%+73.0% +85.2%
3 years, per year —+162.6%+20.1% +22.8%
5 years —+17.7%-96.8% +67.6%
5 years, per year —+3.3%-49.7% +10.9%

Risk

MeasureINFQQBTSARQQSPY
Volatility, 1Y 105.8%100.2%110.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 95.1%93.3%102.1% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 4.284.154.09 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y —-0.66-0.55 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -57.0%-96.7%-99.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -52.5%-68.8%-61.2% -1.2%
52-week high $19.87$37.06$45.37 $779.14
52-week low $8.55$11.54$11.78 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleINFQQBTSARQQ
P/E now vs peer median -21.0xmedian 39.0x -17.2xmedian 39.0x —median 39.0x
P/S now vs peer median 51.6xmedian 4.6x 346.1xmedian 4.6x —median 4.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -21.4xmedian 32.7x -23.5xmedian 32.7x —median 32.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median -95.9xmedian 27.4x -36.1xmedian 27.4x —median 27.4x
P/B now vs peer median 3.7xmedian 3.2x 4.0xmedian 3.2x 9.4xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.23 11.59median 1.23 —median 1.23

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsINFQQBTSARQQ
Revenue $41.08M $12.43M –
Gross profit $11.86M $7.98M –
Operating income -$81.99M -$170.58M –
Net income -$98.83M -$248.70M –
Free cash flow -$22.09M -$119.08M –
R&D $33.10M $81.78M –
EPS (diluted) $-0.45 $-0.67 –
Cash & equivalents $59.29M $296.64M $28.86M
Total debt – $35.03M –
Shares (diluted) 219.74M 370.84M 13.79M
Enterprise value $1.93B $1.07B $109.50M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricINFQQBTSARQQ
P/E -21.0x -17.2x –
P/FCF -95.9x -36.1x –
P/Operating cash flow -103.9x -38.8x –
P/S 51.6x 346.1x –
P/B 3.7x 4.0x 9.4x
P/Tangible book 3.7x 4.9x 10.2x
EV/EBITDA -21.4x -23.5x –
EV/EBIT -20.0x -22.2x –
EV/Revenue 40.0x 305.0x –
EV/FCF -74.3x -31.8x –
EV/Operating cash flow -80.5x -34.2x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 11.59 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricINFQQBTSARQQ
Revenue growth (1Y) – -44.2% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 19.0% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -56.6% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 31.6% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -13.4% -116.9% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -27.8% –
Net income growth (1Y) -39.5% 11.7% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -45.9% –
EPS growth (1Y) 80.1% 28.0% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -1.5% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -109.0% -119.0% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -28.1% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -103.5% -124.4% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -30.9% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricINFQQBTSARQQ
Gross margin 28.9% 64.2% –
EBITDA margin -186.7% -1,297% –
Operating margin -199.6% -1,373% –
Pretax margin -174.4% -1,267% –
Net margin -240.6% -2,002% –
FCF margin -53.8% -958.4% –
Operating cash flow margin -49.6% -892.4% –
Return on equity -12.4% -11.7% –
Return on assets -11.4% -10.9% –
Return on invested capital – -12.3% –
Return on capital employed -14.3% -14.8% –
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.0x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.2x 0.4x –
Stock comp / revenue 54.2% 250.5% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricINFQQBTSARQQ
Debt / assets – 3.0% –
Debt / equity – 0.0x –
Net debt / EBITDA – 3.2x –
Debt / FCF – -0.3x –
Liabilities / assets 10.5% 6.5% 21.3%
Equity / assets 89.5% 93.5% 78.7%
Interest coverage – -180.3x –
Current ratio 9.3x 20.5x 4.9x
Quick ratio 9.1x 20.1x 4.9x
Cash ratio 8.9x 20.0x 4.4x
Altman Z-score 18.80 33.07 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricINFQQBTSARQQ
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -19.9% -1.4% –
Shareholder yield -19.9% -1.4% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusINFQQBTSARQQ
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.24FY2026 $-0.31FY2026 $-1.46FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year $46.67MFY2026 $40.06MFY2026 $2.41MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +43.6%FY2026 +62.9%FY2026 +355.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +26.6% +112.2% +208.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersINFQQBTSARQQ
Held by institutions 41.9% 53.1% 89.2%
Institutions holding 261 550 66
Change in shares held, QoQ +148.6% +12.5% +205.7%
Institutions buying 231 370 42
Institutions selling 23 100 11
Buyers to sellers 10.04 3.70 3.82

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

INFQQBTSARQQ
INFQ 1.00 0.76 0.58
QBTS 0.76 1.00 0.67
ARQQ 0.58 0.67 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, INFQ, QBTS and ARQQ?

D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Infleqtion (INFQ) $1.93B, D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) $3.92B, Arqit Quantum (ARQQ) $218.82M.

Which company is more profitable?

Infleqtion (INFQ) has the highest net margin (Infleqtion (INFQ) -240.6%, D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) -2,001.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Arqit Quantum (ARQQ) returned the most: D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) -66.3%, Arqit Quantum (ARQQ) -61.2%. Over five years, D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) compounded fastest (D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) +3.3%/yr, Arqit Quantum (ARQQ) -49.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) has been the steadiest (Infleqtion (INFQ) 105.8%, D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) 100.2%, Arqit Quantum (ARQQ) 110.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, INFQ, QBTS and ARQQ?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.