INEO vs MNRO vs AIT Stock Comparison

INNEOVA Holdings, Monro and Applied Industrial Technologies Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
INEO INNEOVA Holdings Ltd
$0.53 -17.2% 1M -37.5% 1Y
Market cap
$8.76M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Industrial Distribution Industrials
MNRO Monro, Inc.
$14.16 +3.1% 1M -21.9% 1Y
Market cap
$425.08M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
7.91%
Auto Parts Retail Consumer Discretionary
1 win

Head to Head

6 decided of 12

Applied Industrial Technologies leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Applied Industrial Technologies 5, Monro 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionINEOMNROAITLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $8.76M $425.08M $10.86B AIT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — — 25.7x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 118.0x 23.2x AIT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — — +8.5% –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — — 8.4% –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 20.0% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 0.3x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 7.91% 0.67% MNRO
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -37.5% -21.9% +14.4% AIT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -25.5%/yr +24.7%/yr AIT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 100.7% 62.4% 27.8% AIT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — — 69/100 –

Percentile Scorecard

INEOMNROAIT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisINEOMNROAIT
Valuation – – 29 #33 of 46
Growth – – 58 #17 of 39
Profitability – – 92 #4 of 39
Financial Health 0 #47 of 47 37 #71 of 112 91 #5 of 47
Shareholder Returns – 96 #4 of 72 74 #9 of 32
Overall – – 69
  • INEO ranked among 49 companies in Distribution and Rental
  • MNRO ranked among 115 companies in Retail
  • AIT ranked among 49 companies in Distribution and Rental

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodINEOMNROAITSPY
1 month -17.2%+3.1%-10.7% -0.2%
3 months -17.2%-17.7%-14.5% +3.9%
6 months -30.3%-16.7%-1.2% +8.2%
Year to date +4.1%-29.3%+15.9% +12.9%
1 year -37.5%-21.9%+14.4% +12.3%
3 years —-45.6%+97.3% +87.4%
3 years, per year —-18.4%+25.5% +23.3%
5 years —-77.1%+201.2% +67.9%
5 years, per year —-25.5%+24.7% +10.9%
10 years —-74.3%+492.0% +261.1%
10 years, per year —-12.7%+19.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureINEOMNROAITSPY
Volatility, 1Y 100.7%62.4%27.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 99.1%70.3%31.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.501.940.79 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.37-0.350.52 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -92.8%-82.5%-26.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -37.5%-40.5%-17.9% -1.2%
52-week high $0.85$23.81$362.17 $779.14
52-week low $0.46$11.27$240.63 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleINEOMNROAIT
P/E now vs peer median —median 25.3x —median 16.7x 25.7xmedian 25.3x
P/S now vs peer median —median 1.0x —median 0.5x 2.1xmedian 1.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 13.4x —median 9.0x 17.5xmedian 13.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 21.9x —median 16.5x 25.7xmedian 21.9x
P/B now vs peer median 1.7xmedian 2.6x 0.7xmedian 1.7x 5.8xmedian 2.6x
PEG now vs peer median —median 2.38 —median 0.72 3.56median 2.38

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsINEOMNROAIT
Revenue – – $5.06B
Gross profit – – $1.54B
Operating income – – $564.03M
Net income – – $424.12M
Free cash flow – – $421.86M
EPS (diluted) – – $11.41
Cash & equivalents $644.00K $14.63M –
Total debt $73.68M $387.59M $282.30M
Shares (diluted) 14.40M 31.40M 37.18M
Enterprise value $3.69M $387.26M $10.75B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricINEOMNROAIT
P/E – – 25.7x
P/FCF – – 25.7x
P/Operating cash flow – – 24.1x
P/S – – 2.1x
P/B 1.7x 0.7x 5.8x
P/Tangible book 1.7x 0.7x 6.9x
EV/EBITDA – – 17.5x
EV/EBIT – – 19.6x
EV/Revenue – – 2.2x
EV/FCF – – 26.2x
EV/Operating cash flow – – 24.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – 3.56

Growth

14 metrics
MetricINEOMNROAIT
Revenue growth (1Y) – – 8.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – 4.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 8.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 5.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) – – 9.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – 5.0%
Net income growth (1Y) – – 5.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – 5.3%
EPS growth (1Y) – – 8.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – 7.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – -6.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 5.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – -7.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 5.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricINEOMNROAIT
Gross margin – – 30.4%
EBITDA margin – – 12.4%
Operating margin – – 11.2%
Pretax margin – – 11.0%
Net margin – – 8.4%
FCF margin – – 8.3%
Operating cash flow margin – – 8.9%
Return on equity – – 22.6%
Return on assets – – 14.2%
Return on invested capital – – 20.0%
Return on capital employed – – 22.9%
Asset turnover – – 1.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue – – 0.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricINEOMNROAIT
Debt / assets 39.4% 6.2% 9.5%
Debt / equity 3.6x 0.2x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 0.3x
Debt / FCF – – 0.7x
Liabilities / assets 89.1% 62.3% 36.8%
Equity / assets 10.9% 37.7% 63.2%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 1.0x 0.5x 2.9x
Quick ratio 0.3x 0.1x 1.7x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.0x 0.2x
Altman Z-score – – 10.02

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricINEOMNROAIT
Dividend yield – 7.9% 0.7%
Net buyback yield – – 3.2%
Shareholder yield – 7.9% 3.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 17.4%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 17.5%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 10.6%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 11.1%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusINEOMNROAIT
Forward P/E – 118.0xFY2026 23.2xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year – $0.12FY2026 $12.83FY2027
EPS growth, next FY – -71.4%FY2026 +17.2%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after – +275.0% +7.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $1.18BFY2026 $4.91BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY – +1.9%FY2026 -1.1%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after – -2.6% +5.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersINEOMNROAIT
Held by institutions – 100.0% 94.4%
Institutions holding – 182 617
Change in shares held, QoQ – -7.2% +1.3%
Institutions buying – 96 326
Institutions selling – 65 207
Buyers to sellers – 1.48 1.57

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

INEOMNROAIT
INEO 1.00 0.00 -0.03
MNRO 0.00 1.00 0.23
AIT -0.03 0.23 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, INEO, MNRO and AIT?

Applied Industrial Technologies (AIT) is the largest by market capitalisation: INNEOVA Holdings (INEO) $8.76M, Monro (MNRO) $425.08M, Applied Industrial Technologies (AIT) $10.86B.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Applied Industrial Technologies (AIT) returned the most: INNEOVA Holdings (INEO) -37.5%, Monro (MNRO) -21.9%, Applied Industrial Technologies (AIT) +14.4%. Over five years, Applied Industrial Technologies (AIT) compounded fastest (Monro (MNRO) -25.5%/yr, Applied Industrial Technologies (AIT) +24.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Monro (MNRO) has the highest dividend yield: Monro (MNRO) 7.91%, Applied Industrial Technologies (AIT) 0.67%. INNEOVA Holdings (INEO) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Applied Industrial Technologies (AIT) has been the steadiest (INNEOVA Holdings (INEO) 100.7%, Monro (MNRO) 62.4%, Applied Industrial Technologies (AIT) 27.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, INEO, MNRO and AIT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Applied Industrial Technologies (AIT) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.