ILAL vs HHH vs MRP Stock Comparison

International Land Alliance, Howard Hughes Holdings and Millrose Properties Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MRP Millrose Properties, Inc.
$24.32 -10.6% 1M -26.1% 1Y
Market cap
$4.13B
P/E
8.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$792.29M
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Development Real Estate
3 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Millrose Properties leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Millrose Properties 3, International Land Alliance 3, Howard Hughes Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionILALHHHMRPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.24M $4.34B $4.13B HHH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 14.8x 8.3x MRP
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 1.2x 15.9x 7.5x ILAL
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +34.0% — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 12.3% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 4.0% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 4.0x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +746.7% -10.8% -26.1% ILAL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +9.7%/yr -3.0%/yr — ILAL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 425.4% 33.7% 31.7% MRP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 65/100 69/100 MRP

Percentile Scorecard

ILALHHHMRP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisILALHHHMRP
Valuation – 84 #7 of 39 74 #11 of 39
Growth – 77 #8 of 32 –
Profitability – 75 #8 of 29 –
Financial Health – 24 #29 of 38 32 #26 of 38
Shareholder Returns – – 100 #1 of 14
Overall – 65 69
  • ILAL ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • HHH ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • MRP ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodILALHHHMRPSPY
1 month -68.2%+7.0%-10.6% -0.2%
3 months -69.8%+9.1%-15.0% +3.9%
6 months -81.9%+14.5%-20.8% +8.2%
Year to date +452.2%-8.2%-18.6% +12.9%
1 year +746.7%-10.8%-26.1% +12.3%
3 years +746.7%+17.1%— +87.4%
3 years, per year +103.9%+5.4%— +23.3%
5 years +58.7%-13.9%— +67.9%
5 years, per year +9.7%-3.0%— +10.9%
10 years —-28.2%— +261.1%
10 years, per year —-3.3%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureILALHHHMRPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 425.4%33.7%31.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 182.5%31.4%33.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.240.790.73 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.76-0.32-0.82 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -96.7%-49.0%-40.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -88.5%-18.5%-26.1% -1.2%
52-week high $11.00$89.85$32.90 $779.14
52-week low $0.14$60.20$21.21 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleILALHHHMRP
P/E now vs peer median —median 7.9x 12.9xmedian 7.9x 8.1xmedian 7.9x
P/S now vs peer median —median 4.7x 1.6xmedian 4.7x 4.7xmedian 4.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 11.2x 9.4xmedian 11.2x —median 11.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 6.2x 6.1xmedian 6.2x 1.1xmedian 6.2x
P/B now vs peer median —median 0.6x 0.9xmedian 0.6x 0.6xmedian 0.6x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.32 0.47median 0.32 —median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsILALHHHMRP
Revenue – $2.37B $792.29M
Gross profit – $1.79B –
Operating income – $505.99M $674.91M
Net income – $290.16M –
Free cash flow – $628.36M –
EPS (diluted) – $4.94 $3.02
Cash & equivalents – $2.65B $64.54M
Total debt $34.32M $5.46B $3.13B
Shares (diluted) 3.75M 59.15M 166.06M
Enterprise value $5.24M -$3.10B $4.13B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricILALHHHMRP
P/E – 12.9x 8.1x
P/FCF – 6.1x 1.1x
P/Operating cash flow – 4.8x –
P/S – 1.6x 4.7x
P/B – 0.9x 0.6x
P/Tangible book – 1.1x 0.6x
EV/EBITDA – 9.4x –
EV/EBIT – 13.0x –
EV/Revenue – 2.8x 8.7x
EV/FCF – 10.5x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 8.4x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.47 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricILALHHHMRP
Revenue growth (1Y) – 34.0% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 20.1% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 67.9% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 31.7% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – -11.9% 160.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 8.1% –
Net income growth (1Y) – 27.3% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 34.5% –
EPS growth (1Y) – 20.1% 131.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 27.2% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 33.7% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 120.5% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricILALHHHMRP
Gross margin – 75.6% –
EBITDA margin – 29.4% –
Operating margin – 21.3% –
Pretax margin – 16.0% –
Net margin – 12.3% –
FCF margin – 26.5% –
Operating cash flow margin – 33.2% –
Return on equity – 7.4% –
Return on assets – 2.1% –
Return on invested capital – 4.0% –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover – 0.2x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 2.7x –
Stock comp / revenue – 0.7% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricILALHHHMRP
Debt / assets – 34.3% –
Debt / equity – 1.4x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA – 4.0x –
Debt / FCF – 8.7x –
Liabilities / assets – 74.6% 44.6%
Equity / assets – 25.4% 55.4%
Interest coverage – 2.9x –
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricILALHHHMRP
Dividend yield – – 12.6%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – 0.0% 12.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusILALHHHMRP
Forward P/E 1.2xFY2023 15.9xFY2026 7.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.02FY2023 $4.01FY2026 $3.26FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +81.4%FY2026 +33.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +827.5% -14.2% -7.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $8.48MFY2023 $2.70BFY2026 $840.33MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +83.4%FY2026 +39.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +250.0% -3.0% +11.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersILALHHHMRP
Held by institutions – 90.7% 89.6%
Institutions holding – 303 523
Change in shares held, QoQ – +1.8% +1.8%
Institutions buying – 170 280
Institutions selling – 87 136
Buyers to sellers – 1.95 2.06

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ILALHHHMRP
ILAL 1.00 0.07 0.11
HHH 0.07 1.00 0.31
MRP 0.11 0.31 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ILAL, HHH and MRP?

Howard Hughes Holdings (HHH) is the largest by market capitalisation: International Land Alliance (ILAL) $5.24M, Howard Hughes Holdings (HHH) $4.34B, Millrose Properties (MRP) $4.13B.

Which stock is cheaper, ILAL, HHH and MRP?

Millrose Properties (MRP) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Howard Hughes Holdings (HHH) 14.8x, Millrose Properties (MRP) 8.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, International Land Alliance (ILAL) is cheapest (International Land Alliance (ILAL) 1.2x, Howard Hughes Holdings (HHH) 15.9x, Millrose Properties (MRP) 7.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year International Land Alliance (ILAL) returned the most: International Land Alliance (ILAL) +746.7%, Howard Hughes Holdings (HHH) -10.8%, Millrose Properties (MRP) -26.1%. Over five years, International Land Alliance (ILAL) compounded fastest (International Land Alliance (ILAL) +9.7%/yr, Howard Hughes Holdings (HHH) -3.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Millrose Properties (MRP) has been the steadiest (International Land Alliance (ILAL) 425.4%, Howard Hughes Holdings (HHH) 33.7%, Millrose Properties (MRP) 31.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ILAL, HHH and MRP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Millrose Properties (MRP) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.