IIIV vs FIS vs KHOBF Stock Comparison

i3 Verticals, Fidelity National Information Services and Kheoba Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
IIIV i3 Verticals, Inc.
$19.02 +27.1% 1M -36.7% 1Y
Market cap
$373.35M
P/E
43.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$218.16M
Div. yield
–
ERP Software Technology
3 wins
KHOBF KHEOBA Ltd
$2.50 0.0% 1M 0.0% 1Y
Market cap
$20.23M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
ERP Software Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Fidelity National Information Services leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Fidelity National Information Services 6, i3 Verticals 3, Kheoba 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionIIIVFISKHOBFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $373.35M $15.21B $20.23M FIS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 43.8x 4.5x — FIS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 19.0x 4.7x — FIS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +4.1% +18.3% — FIS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 3.9% 27.6% — FIS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.8% 3.9% — FIS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.1x 4.9x — IIIV
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.06% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -36.7% -52.9% 0.0% KHOBF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -3.3%/yr -23.5%/yr — IIIV
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 46.3% 43.9% 0.0% KHOBF
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 69/100 68/100 — IIIV

Percentile Scorecard

IIIVFISKHOBF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisIIIVFISKHOBF
Valuation 85 #16 of 99 95 #6 of 99 –
Growth 52 #48 of 98 81 #19 of 98 –
Profitability 59 #40 of 96 64 #35 of 96 –
Financial Health 50 #56 of 111 19 #90 of 111 80 #23 of 111
Shareholder Returns 100 #1 of 67 80 #14 of 67 –
Overall 69 68 –
  • IIIV ranked among 113 companies in Business Applications
  • FIS ranked among 113 companies in Business Applications
  • KHOBF ranked among 113 companies in Business Applications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodIIIVFISKHOBFSPY
1 month +27.1%-11.3%0.0% -1.0%
3 months -15.2%-30.5%0.0% -0.4%
6 months -13.5%-35.2%0.0% +4.5%
Year to date -24.5%-55.2%0.0% +12.4%
1 year -36.7%-52.9%0.0% +13.6%
3 years -6.9%-42.7%— +76.4%
3 years, per year -2.4%-17.0%— +20.8%
5 years -15.4%-73.8%— +63.7%
5 years, per year -3.3%-23.5%— +10.4%
10 years —-60.5%— +267.7%
10 years, per year —-8.9%— +13.9%

Risk

MeasureIIIVFISKHOBFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 46.3%43.9%0.0% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 54.8%52.0%— 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.25-0.040.00 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.79-1.21— 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -58.3%-75.5%-37.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -36.8%-55.9%0.0% -1.6%
52-week high $30.11$67.54$2.50 $779.14
52-week low $13.82$29.77$2.50 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleIIIVFISKHOBF
P/E now vs peer median 43.4xmedian 25.3x 4.6xmedian 25.3x —median 25.3x
P/S now vs peer median 2.3xmedian 2.8x 1.3xmedian 2.8x —median 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 17.3xmedian 16.5x 8.5xmedian 16.5x —median 16.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 10.1xmedian 16.1x 5.4xmedian 16.1x —median 16.1x
P/B now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 2.8x 1.0xmedian 2.8x 122.0xmedian 2.8x
PEG now vs peer median 0.93median 0.84 0.16median 0.84 —median 0.84

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsIIIVFISKHOBF
Revenue $218.16M $12.20B –
Gross profit – $4.39B –
Operating income $5.94M $1.92B –
Net income $11.89M $3.38B –
Free cash flow $49.93M $2.82B –
EPS (diluted) $0.44 $6.52 –
Cash & equivalents $2.65M $744.00M $318.16K
Total debt $114.28M $21.17B –
Shares (diluted) 19.54M 517.00M 8.09M
Enterprise value $259.36M $12.54B $19.91M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricIIIVFISKHOBF
P/E 43.4x 4.6x –
P/FCF 10.1x 5.4x –
P/Operating cash flow 9.7x 5.2x –
P/S 2.3x 1.3x –
P/B 1.3x 1.0x 122.0x
P/Tangible book 1.3x 1.3x 125.8x
EV/EBITDA 17.3x 8.5x –
EV/EBIT 104.1x 18.7x –
EV/Revenue 2.8x 2.9x –
EV/FCF 12.4x 12.7x –
EV/Operating cash flow 11.8x 12.0x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.93 0.16 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricIIIVFISKHOBF
Revenue growth (1Y) 4.1% 18.3% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 4.3% 7.7% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 15.9% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 7.2% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 3.9% 10.2% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 32.5% 10.6% –
Net income growth (1Y) -91.5% 2,836% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 47.6% 28.9% –
EPS growth (1Y) -88.9% 2,957% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 46.5% 29.3% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 662.8% 31.6% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 15.2% 85.1% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 935.6% 32.4% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 18.1% 100.7% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricIIIVFISKHOBF
Gross margin – 35.9% –
EBITDA margin 16.4% 34.3% –
Operating margin 2.7% 15.7% –
Pretax margin 6.9% 11.1% –
Net margin 3.9% 27.6% –
FCF margin 22.9% 23.1% –
Operating cash flow margin 24.0% 24.4% –
Return on equity 3.1% 21.1% –
Return on assets 2.1% 7.7% –
Return on invested capital 0.8% 3.9% –
Return on capital employed 1.0% 5.6% –
Asset turnover 0.3x 0.3x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 4.4x 0.9x –
Stock comp / revenue 8.3% 1.5% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricIIIVFISKHOBF
Debt / assets 18.2% 48.0% –
Debt / equity 0.3x 1.3x –
Net debt / EBITDA 3.1x 4.9x –
Debt / FCF 2.3x 7.5x –
Liabilities / assets 36.1% 63.6% 49.8%
Equity / assets 63.9% 36.4% 50.2%
Interest coverage – 3.2x –
Current ratio 1.2x 0.5x 2.0x
Quick ratio 1.0x 0.4x 2.0x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.1x 1.9x
Altman Z-score 2.02 -0.03 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricIIIVFISKHOBF
Dividend yield – 5.8% –
Net buyback yield 27.0% 4.7% –
Shareholder yield 27.0% 10.5% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – 25.9% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 31.0% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 6.3% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusIIIVFISKHOBF
Forward P/E 19.0xFY2026 4.7xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $1.00FY2026 $6.37FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY -4.8%FY2026 +10.8%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +17.0% +6.8% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $211.26MFY2026 $12.98BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY -0.9%FY2026 +21.5%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +11.9% +4.6% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersIIIVFISKHOBF
Held by institutions 80.1% 98.7% –
Institutions holding 134 858 –
Change in shares held, QoQ -12.0% +3.5% –
Institutions buying 57 415 –
Institutions selling 60 333 –
Buyers to sellers 0.95 1.25 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

IIIVFISKHOBF
IIIV 1.00 0.27 –
FIS 0.27 1.00 –
KHOBF – – –

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, IIIV, FIS and KHOBF?

Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) is the largest by market capitalisation: i3 Verticals (IIIV) $373.35M, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) $15.21B, Kheoba (KHOBF) $20.23M.

Which stock is cheaper, IIIV, FIS and KHOBF?

Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (i3 Verticals (IIIV) 43.8x, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) 4.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) is cheapest (i3 Verticals (IIIV) 19.0x, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) 4.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: i3 Verticals (IIIV) +4.1%, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) +18.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) has the highest net margin (i3 Verticals (IIIV) 3.9%, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) 27.6%). On return on invested capital, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) leads (i3 Verticals (IIIV) 0.8%, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) 3.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Kheoba (KHOBF) returned the most: i3 Verticals (IIIV) -36.7%, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) -52.9%, Kheoba (KHOBF) 0.0%. Over five years, i3 Verticals (IIIV) compounded fastest (i3 Verticals (IIIV) -3.3%/yr, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) -23.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: i3 Verticals (IIIV) 0.00%, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) 0.06%. i3 Verticals (IIIV) and Kheoba (KHOBF) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Kheoba (KHOBF) has been the steadiest (i3 Verticals (IIIV) 46.3%, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) 43.9%, Kheoba (KHOBF) 0.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, IIIV, FIS and KHOBF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.