IHT vs PK vs XHR Stock Comparison

Innsuites Hospitality Trust, Park Hotels & Resorts and Xenia Hotels & Resorts Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Xenia Hotels & Resorts leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Xenia Hotels & Resorts 7, Park Hotels & Resorts 1, Innsuites Hospitality Trust 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionIHTPKXHRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $10.56M $3.35B $1.91B PK
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -9.1x -20.6x -263.9x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 33.9x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +1.7% -1.4% +1.6% IHT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -15.3% -6.4% -0.7% XHR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 0.7% 2.9% XHR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 37.2x 10.9x 6.0x XHR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -31.3% +50.4% +61.0% XHR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -21.6%/yr -2.1%/yr +3.1%/yr XHR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 56.4% 30.6% 27.4% XHR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 19/100 41/100 46/100 XHR

Percentile Scorecard

IHTPKXHR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisIHTPKXHR
Valuation 15 #24 of 28 68 #47 of 145 72 #42 of 145
Growth 17 #21 of 25 3 #138 of 142 19 #115 of 142
Profitability 13 #22 of 25 24 #103 of 135 34 #90 of 135
Financial Health 41 #18 of 30 27 #99 of 136 41 #81 of 136
Shareholder Returns 11 #17 of 19 82 #24 of 131 66 #45 of 131
Overall 19 41 46
  • IHT ranked among 31 companies in Travel and Lodging
  • PK ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • XHR ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodIHTPKXHRSPY
1 month -20.3%+5.8%+12.3% +0.9%
3 months -36.8%+8.6%-5.2% +5.9%
6 months -2.7%+46.6%+28.7% +8.5%
Year to date -17.9%+59.0%+46.3% +13.3%
1 year -31.3%+50.4%+61.0% +12.4%
3 years -12.0%+49.6%+83.9% +88.1%
3 years, per year -4.2%+14.4%+22.5% +23.5%
5 years -70.4%-10.3%+16.2% +68.2%
5 years, per year -21.6%-2.1%+3.1% +11.0%
10 years -47.6%—+33.7% +263.4%
10 years, per year -6.3%—+2.9% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureIHTPKXHRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 56.4%30.6%27.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 56.9%27.6%28.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.460.770.54 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.551.652.23 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -75.9%-58.1%-54.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -40.5%-2.1%-5.2% -0.9%
52-week high $1.85$16.99$21.82 $779.14
52-week low $1.00$9.84$12.30 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleIHTPKXHR
P/E now vs peer median -8.8xmedian 18.2x -20.4xmedian 25.8x -264.3xmedian 25.8x
P/S now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 1.5x 1.3xmedian 4.0x 1.7xmedian 4.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 81.5xmedian 14.1x 20.8xmedian 14.2x 15.3xmedian 14.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median -14.0xmedian 16.4x 41.3xmedian 23.0x 16.5xmedian 23.0x
P/B now vs peer median 3.8xmedian 2.5x 1.1xmedian 1.3x 1.6xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.14median 0.30 0.38median 1.91 9.03median 1.91

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsIHTPKXHR
Revenue $7.59M $2.54B $1.09B
Gross profit – $756.00M $337.00M
Operating income -$551.16K $52.00M $73.11M
Net income -$1.25M -$159.00M -$7.69M
Free cash flow -$733.21K $81.00M $115.51M
EPS (diluted) $-0.12 $-0.82 $-0.08
Cash & equivalents $246.56K $264.00M $112.36M
Total debt $38.13M $3.92B $1.36B
Shares (diluted) 9.35M 200.00M 92.25M
Enterprise value $9.91M $2.42B $1.36B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricIHTPKXHR
P/E -8.8x -20.4x -264.3x
P/FCF -14.0x 41.3x 16.5x
P/Operating cash flow -36.1x 8.3x 10.5x
P/S 1.4x 1.3x 1.7x
P/B 3.8x 1.1x 1.6x
P/Tangible book 3.8x 1.1x 1.6x
EV/EBITDA 81.5x 20.8x 15.3x
EV/EBIT -34.3x 134.6x 43.2x
EV/Revenue 2.5x 2.8x 2.9x
EV/FCF -25.8x 86.4x 27.3x
EV/Operating cash flow -66.4x 17.3x 17.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.14 0.38 9.03

Growth

14 metrics
MetricIHTPKXHR
Revenue growth (1Y) 1.7% -1.4% 1.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.6% -1.9% 1.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 1.5% 3.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -0.2% 0.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) 13.3% -79.2% -30.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -11.0% -31.0% -13.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 11.6% -333.8% -111.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -58.3% -61.1% -28.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 19.8% -379.6% -112.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -62.0% -54.0% -29.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 33.4% -2.4% 5.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -30.2% -4.8% -1.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 30.6% -56.9% 356.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -41.2% -29.2% 2.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricIHTPKXHR
Gross margin – 29.8% 30.8%
EBITDA margin 3.1% 13.2% 18.9%
Operating margin -7.3% 2.0% 6.7%
Pretax margin -12.8% -5.7% -0.6%
Net margin -15.3% -6.4% -0.7%
FCF margin -9.7% 3.2% 10.6%
Operating cash flow margin -3.8% 15.9% 16.6%
Return on equity -140.6% -5.1% -0.7%
Return on assets -9.1% -2.0% -0.3%
Return on invested capital – 0.7% 2.9%
Return on capital employed -4.5% – –
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.3x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.2x -2.5x -23.7x
Stock comp / revenue 0.2% 0.8% 1.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricIHTPKXHR
Debt / assets 64.8% 50.8% 50.0%
Debt / equity 3.3x 1.3x 1.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 37.2x 10.9x 6.0x
Debt / FCF -12.1x 48.3x 11.8x
Liabilities / assets 80.3% 59.9% 57.2%
Equity / assets 19.7% 40.1% 42.8%
Interest coverage -1.1x 0.3x 0.9x
Current ratio 1.3x – –
Quick ratio 1.2x – –
Cash ratio 0.2x – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricIHTPKXHR
Dividend yield 0.9% 6.0% 2.7%
Net buyback yield – – 2.6%
Shareholder yield 0.9% 6.0% 5.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – -9.9%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 0.7%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 32.3%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – -68.0%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusIHTPKXHR
Forward P/E – 33.9xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year – $0.49FY2026 $-0.02FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – -103.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +12.2% –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $2.42BFY2026 $1.08BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – -4.6%FY2026 -0.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +2.6% +10.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersIHTPKXHR
Held by institutions 3.3% 100.0% 95.2%
Institutions holding 13 397 298
Change in shares held, QoQ +37.0% +9.7% -2.2%
Institutions buying 4 218 161
Institutions selling 3 114 90
Buyers to sellers 1.33 1.91 1.79

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

IHTPKXHR
IHT 1.00 0.04 0.06
PK 0.04 1.00 0.73
XHR 0.06 0.73 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, IHT, PK and XHR?

Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) is the largest by market capitalisation: Innsuites Hospitality Trust (IHT) $10.56M, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) $3.35B, Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) $1.91B.

Which company is growing faster?

Innsuites Hospitality Trust (IHT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Innsuites Hospitality Trust (IHT) +1.7%, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) -1.4%, Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) +1.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) has the highest net margin (Innsuites Hospitality Trust (IHT) -15.3%, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) -6.4%, Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) -0.7%). On return on invested capital, Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) leads (Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) 0.7%, Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) 2.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) returned the most: Innsuites Hospitality Trust (IHT) -31.3%, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) +50.4%, Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) +61.0%. Over five years, Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) compounded fastest (Innsuites Hospitality Trust (IHT) -21.6%/yr, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) -2.1%/yr, Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) +3.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Innsuites Hospitality Trust (IHT) 0.00%, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) 0.00%, Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) 0.00%. Innsuites Hospitality Trust (IHT) and Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) has been the steadiest (Innsuites Hospitality Trust (IHT) 56.4%, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) 30.6%, Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) 27.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, IHT, PK and XHR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.