IESC vs APG Stock Comparison

IES Holdings and APi Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
IESC IES Holdings, Inc.
$216.94 -33.1% 1M -50.4% 1Y
Market cap
$9.03B
P/E
19.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.99B
Div. yield
–
Utility Construction Industrials
5 wins
APG APi Group Corp
$40.27 +4.7% 1M +15.8% 1Y
Market cap
$17.66B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$8.44B
Div. yield
–
Facility Services Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

IES Holdings leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (IES Holdings 5, APi 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionIESCAPGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $9.03B $17.66B APG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 19.8x -71.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 20.0x 23.8x IESC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +22.7% +14.1% IESC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 11.4% -2.9% IESC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 6.7% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.8x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -50.4% +15.8% APG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +34.4%/yr +23.1%/yr IESC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 105.4% 30.1% APG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 67/100 44/100 IESC

Percentile Scorecard

IESCAPG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisIESCAPG
Valuation 47 #28 of 52 28 #81 of 112
Growth 83 #7 of 37 76 #24 of 96
Profitability 92 #4 of 37 54 #42 of 91
Financial Health 89 #7 of 57 46 #68 of 125
Shareholder Returns 23 #21 of 27 17 #56 of 67
Overall 67 44
  • IESC ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services
  • APG ranked among 130 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodIESCAPGSPY
1 month -33.1%+4.7% -0.8%
3 months -64.0%+0.9% +3.5%
6 months -64.3%-18.5% +7.0%
Year to date -44.2%+5.3% +12.2%
1 year -50.4%+15.8% +13.0%
3 years +254.8%+137.3% +86.3%
3 years, per year +52.6%+33.4% +23.1%
5 years +338.3%+182.2% +68.6%
5 years, per year +34.4%+23.1% +11.0%
10 years +1,396.1%— +258.0%
10 years, per year +31.1%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureIESCAPGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 105.4%30.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 130.3%31.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.971.28 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.480.53 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -73.1%-49.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -72.7%-18.5% -1.8%
52-week high $793.96$49.40 $779.14
52-week low $213.54$34.31 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleIESCAPG
P/E now vs peer median 19.0xmedian 25.7x -70.3xmedian 21.9x
P/S now vs peer median 2.2xmedian 0.8x 2.1xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 15.0xmedian 12.9x 21.3xmedian 12.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 37.8xmedian 22.5x 25.7xmedian 14.3x
P/B now vs peer median 7.0xmedian 2.3x 4.9xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.25median 0.56 1.01median 1.02

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsIESCAPG
Revenue $3.99B $8.44B
Gross profit $1.05B $2.65B
Operating income $492.85M $605.00M
Net income $457.91M $346.00M
Free cash flow $228.40M $676.00M
EPS (diluted) $11.29 $-0.57
Cash & equivalents $77.28M $851.00M
Total debt – $3.52B
Shares (diluted) 40.40M 437.00M
Enterprise value $7.89B $14.69B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricIESCAPG
P/E 19.0x -70.3x
P/FCF 37.8x 25.7x
P/Operating cash flow 23.3x 22.3x
P/S 2.2x 2.1x
P/B 7.0x 4.9x
P/Tangible book 7.4x 9.8x
EV/EBITDA 15.0x 21.3x
EV/EBIT 16.8x 33.2x
EV/Revenue 2.1x 2.4x
EV/FCF 36.2x 29.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 22.2x 25.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.25 1.01

Growth

14 metrics
MetricIESCAPG
Revenue growth (1Y) 22.7% 14.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 19.3% 7.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 29.0% 15.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 37.7% 13.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) 39.1% 24.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 55.3% 27.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 66.5% 39.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 67.8% 40.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 69.8% -272.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 74.5% -69.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 50.4% 20.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 41.6% 24.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 23.2% 18.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 25.1% 28.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricIESCAPG
Gross margin 26.3% 31.4%
EBITDA margin 13.8% 11.2%
Operating margin 12.4% 7.2%
Pretax margin 14.5% 5.5%
Net margin 11.4% -2.9%
FCF margin 5.7% 8.0%
Operating cash flow margin 9.3% 9.3%
Return on equity 39.8% 9.9%
Return on assets 21.4% 3.7%
Return on invested capital – 6.7%
Return on capital employed 41.3% 8.7%
Asset turnover 1.9x 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.8x 2.3x
Stock comp / revenue 0.4% 0.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricIESCAPG
Debt / assets – 35.4%
Debt / equity – 1.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.8x
Debt / FCF – 5.2x
Liabilities / assets 46.0% 64.7%
Equity / assets 54.0% 35.3%
Interest coverage 140.8x 4.3x
Current ratio 1.6x 1.4x
Quick ratio 1.2x 1.3x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.3x
Altman Z-score 8.45 2.89

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricIESCAPG
Dividend yield – –
Net buyback yield 0.2% 0.4%
Shareholder yield 0.2% 0.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusIESCAPG
Forward P/E 20.0xFY2026 23.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $10.85FY2026 $1.69FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +58.9%FY2026 +14.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +18.0% +16.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.10BFY2026 $9.25BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +21.7%FY2026 +16.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +60.7% +8.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersIESCAPG
Held by institutions 96.8% 84.5%
Institutions holding 412 581
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.6% +5.1%
Institutions buying 224 306
Institutions selling 144 205
Buyers to sellers 1.56 1.49

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

IESCAPG
IESC 1.00 0.40
APG 0.40 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, IESC and APG?

APi (APG) is the largest by market capitalisation: IES Holdings (IESC) $9.03B, APi (APG) $17.66B.

Which company is growing faster?

IES Holdings (IESC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: IES Holdings (IESC) +22.7%, APi (APG) +14.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

IES Holdings (IESC) has the highest net margin (IES Holdings (IESC) 11.4%, APi (APG) -2.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year APi (APG) returned the most: IES Holdings (IESC) -50.4%, APi (APG) +15.8%. Over five years, IES Holdings (IESC) compounded fastest (IES Holdings (IESC) +34.4%/yr, APi (APG) +23.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, APi (APG) has been the steadiest (IES Holdings (IESC) 105.4%, APi (APG) 30.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do IESC and APG move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.40, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, IESC and APG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, IES Holdings (IESC) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.